Rule of Law in Poland: concerns continue to grow among MEPs | Nieuws | Europees Parlement

Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
 
  • Continuing and systematic attacks against judicial independence, democratic institutions and minority rights 
  • Calls for the expansion of ongoing Article 7 proceedings to address additional concerns 
  • Need for immediate action by Council and Commission, including budgetary measures, to protect EU core values 

The attacks on the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights in Poland need to be addressed urgently, say a majority of MEPs in the Civil Liberties Committee.

In a committee debate on Monday, Juan Fernando López Aguilar (S&D, ES) presented his draft interim report on the December 2017 European Commission proposal to act in view of the perceived threats to the independence of the judiciary in Poland. He pointed to the recent worrying developments in the country related to the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights.


Judicial independence, democratic institutions and fundamental rights under threat


Afterwards, the President of the European Association of Judges, José Igreja Matos, and a representative of the Polish judges association IUSTITIA, Joanna Hetnarowicz-Sikora, presented a series of concerns linked primarily to judicial independence and the rule of law. They also mentioned other worries around democracy and elections, as well as fundamental rights (especially those of minorities), such as the freedom of speech and assembly, and their curtailment in light of the pandemic.


Most MEPs shared the concern over the state of EU core values in the country. They referred to a systematic and continuing attack against judicial independence and democratic institutions, which poses a threat to the very structure of the EU, and called for decisive action by the Council and the Commission, including budgetary measures, in order to protect EU core values.


Some speakers mentioned that further input from the Polish authorities is necessary to have a balanced debate, while several references were made to the need for an independent, permanent EU mechanism to ensure that monitoring processes in the area of rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights remain impartial and objective.


Next steps

MEPs have until 28 May to table amendments to the draft interim report. The committee will vote on the text in July, with the plenary vote scheduled in September 2020.

Background


Parliament agrees with the Commission that rule of law is at risk in Poland, which faces multiple infringement proceedings for this reason (with the latest one initiated on 29 April), but the Council has so far not taken a formal step in that regard.


According to Article 7 of the Treaty of the EU, the Council may determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach of EU values. Before doing so, ministers shall hear the views of the national authorities. The Polish authorities have presented their positions in front of the Council on three occasions, between June and December 2018.


At a later stage, the European Council may determine, by unanimity and with the Parliament’s consent, that there is a serious and persistent breach of the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights. This could eventually lead to sanctions, including suspension of voting rights in the Council.


In its resolution of 17 April about the EU’s response against COVID-19, the European Parliament pointed to recent moves by the Polish authorities to change the electoral code in order to hold Presidential elections in the middle of a pandemic. MEPs warned this may “undermine the concept of free, equal, direct and secret elections as enshrined in the Polish Constitution”.

A recording of the debate is available by clicking here.


 
Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
  • Direct naar de inhoud van de pagina (druk op "Enter") 
  • Direct naar de inhoud van de pagina (druk op "Enter") Direct naar de inhoud van de pagina (druk op "Enter") 
  • Rechtstreeks naar talenmenu (druk op "Enter") 
  • Rechtstreeks naar talenmenu (druk op "Enter") Rechtstreeks naar talenmenu (druk op "Enter") 
  • Rechtstreeks naar zoekmenu (druk op "Enter") 
  • Rechtstreeks naar zoekmenu (druk op "Enter") Rechtstreeks naar zoekmenu (druk op "Enter")  Europees Parlement  Europees Parlement  Nieuws  Nieuws  
    Navigatiebalk (Menu)  
    Navigatiebalk (Menu)  
    Navigatiebalk (Menu)   Navigatiebalk (Menu) Navigatiebalk ()  Navigatiebalk (Menu)   Navigatiebalk (Menu) Navigatiebalk () 
    1. Nieuws  Nieuws 
    2. Pers  Pers 
    3. Agenda  Agenda 
  • Nieuws  Nieuws 
  • Nieuws  Nieuws 
    Nieuws Nieuws Nieuws Nieuws 
    Startpagina  Startpagina  Categorie:Europese zaken  Categorie:Europese zakenCategorie:  Categorie:Wereld  Categorie:WereldCategorie:  Categorie:Economie  Categorie:EconomieCategorie:  Categorie:Maatschappij  Categorie:MaatschappijCategorie:  Categorie:Veiligheid  Categorie:VeiligheidCategorie:  Menu sluiten  Menu sluiten 
  • Pers  Pers 
  • Pers  Pers 
    Pers Pers  Pers  Pers 
    Startpagina   Startpagina Accreditatie Accreditatie Contact Contact Close(Pers) Close(Pers)(Pers) 
  • Agenda  Agenda 
  • Agenda  Agenda 
    Agenda Agenda  Agenda  Agenda 
    Hoogtepunten Hoogtepunten Wekelijkse agenda Wekelijkse agenda Briefing Briefing Menu sluiten Menu sluiten  Veelgestelde vragen  Veelgestelde vragen  #EuropeanenTegenCovid19  #EuropeanenTegenCovid19  Sluit de navigatiebalk(Menu)  Sluit de navigatiebalk(Menu)Sluit de navigatiebalk()   
    Naar het zoekveld   Naar het zoekveld Search 
    Zoekopdracht starten  Sluit het zoekveld   Sluit het zoekveld 
    Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
    Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
    Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
    Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
    Taal kiezen 
    Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
    Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
    Huidige taal:NL - Nederlands Selecteer 
    Andere websites 
    Andere websites bekijken  Andere websites bekijken 
    Andere websites 
    Andere websites  Andere websites bekijken  Andere websites bekijken  Andere websites bekijken  Andere websites bekijken 
    1. Nieuws 
    2. Leden 
    3. Over het Parlement 
    4. Plenaire vergadering 
    5. Commissies 
    6. Delegaties 
    7. Andere websitesMeer 
      View Andere websitesMeer  Andere websitesMeer 
  • Nieuws 
  • Nieuws  Nieuws 
  • Leden 
  • Leden  Leden 
  • Over het Parlement 
  • Over het Parlement  Over het Parlement 
  • Plenaire vergadering 
  • Plenaire vergadering  Plenaire vergadering 
  • Commissies 
  • Commissies  Commissies 
  • Delegaties 
  • Delegaties  Delegaties 
  • Andere websitesMeer 
    View Andere websitesMeer  Andere websitesMeer 
  • Andere websitesMeer 
    View Andere websitesMeer  Andere websitesMeer 
    Andere websitesMeer 
    Andere websitesMeerAndere websitesMeer View Andere websitesMeer View Andere websitesMeerView Andere websitesMeer Andere websitesMeer Andere websitesMeerAndere websitesMeer 
    1. Multimedia Centre 
    2. Webpagina van de Voorzitter 
    3. Secretariaat-generaal 
    4. Think tank 
    5. EP Newshub 
    6. Tot uw dienst 
    7. Bezoeken 
    8. Legislative train 
    9. Contracten en subsidies 
    10. Registreren 
  • Multimedia Centre 
  • Multimedia Centre Multimedia Centre 
  • Webpagina van de Voorzitter 
  • Webpagina van de Voorzitter Webpagina van de Voorzitter 
  • Secretariaat-generaal 
  • Secretariaat-generaal Secretariaat-generaal 
  • Think tank 
  • Think tank Think tank 
  • EP Newshub 
  • EP Newshub EP Newshub 
  • Tot uw dienst 
  • Tot uw dienst Tot uw dienst 
  • Bezoeken 
  • Bezoeken Bezoeken 
  • Legislative train 
  • Legislative train Legislative train 
  • Contracten en subsidies 
  • Contracten en subsidies Contracten en subsidies 
  • Registreren 
  • Registreren Registreren Andere websites verbergenAndere websitesMeer Andere websites verbergenAndere websitesMeerAndere websites verbergenAndere websitesMeer  Andere websites verbergen  Andere websites verbergen 
    Pers   > Huidige pagina: Rule of Law in Poland: concerns continue to grow among MEPs  
    Pers   > Pers  Pers > Huidige pagina: Rule of Law in Poland: concerns continue to grow among MEPs   Huidige pagina: Rule of Law in Poland: concerns continue to grow among MEPs   Huidige pagina:Rule of Law in Poland: concerns continue to grow among MEPs  Pers  Pers >
     
    • Continuing and systematic attacks against judicial independence, democratic institutions and minority rights 
    • Calls for the expansion of ongoing Article 7 proceedings to address additional concerns 
    • Need for immediate action by Council and Commission, including budgetary measures, to protect EU core values 

    The attacks on the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights in Poland need to be addressed urgently, say a majority of MEPs in the Civil Liberties Committee.

    In a committee debate on Monday, Juan Fernando López Aguilar (S&D, ES) presented his draft interim report on the December 2017 European Commission proposal to act in view of the perceived threats to the independence of the judiciary in Poland. He pointed to the recent worrying developments in the country related to the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights.


    Judicial independence, democratic institutions and fundamental rights under threat


    Afterwards, the President of the European Association of Judges, José Igreja Matos, and a representative of the Polish judges association IUSTITIA, Joanna Hetnarowicz-Sikora, presented a series of concerns linked primarily to judicial independence and the rule of law. They also mentioned other worries around democracy and elections, as well as fundamental rights (especially those of minorities), such as the freedom of speech and assembly, and their curtailment in light of the pandemic.


    Most MEPs shared the concern over the state of EU core values in the country. They referred to a systematic and continuing attack against judicial independence and democratic institutions, which poses a threat to the very structure of the EU, and called for decisive action by the Council and the Commission, including budgetary measures, in order to protect EU core values.


    Some speakers mentioned that further input from the Polish authorities is necessary to have a balanced debate, while several references were made to the need for an independent, permanent EU mechanism to ensure that monitoring processes in the area of rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights remain impartial and objective.


    Next steps

    MEPs have until 28 May to table amendments to the draft interim report. The committee will vote on the text in July, with the plenary vote scheduled in September 2020.

    Background


    Parliament agrees with the Commission that rule of law is at risk in Poland, which faces multiple infringement proceedings for this reason (with the latest one initiated on 29 April), but the Council has so far not taken a formal step in that regard.


    According to Article 7 of the Treaty of the EU, the Council may determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach of EU values. Before doing so, ministers shall hear the views of the national authorities. The Polish authorities have presented their positions in front of the Council on three occasions, between June and December 2018.


    At a later stage, the European Council may determine, by unanimity and with the Parliament’s consent, that there is a serious and persistent breach of the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights. This could eventually lead to sanctions, including suspension of voting rights in the Council.


    In its resolution of 17 April about the EU’s response against COVID-19, the European Parliament pointed to recent moves by the Polish authorities to change the electoral code in order to hold Presidential elections in the middle of a pandemic. MEPs warned this may “undermine the concept of free, equal, direct and secret elections as enshrined in the Polish Constitution”.

    A recording of the debate is available by clicking here.


     
     

    Rule of Law in Poland: concerns continue to grow among MEPs 

    Persbericht 
    Bijgewerkt op: 
     
    Gecreëerd:   
     
     

    Rule of Law in Poland: concerns continue to grow among MEPs 

    Persbericht 
    Bijgewerkt op: 
     
    Gecreëerd:   

    Rule of Law in Poland: concerns continue to grow among MEPs 

    Persbericht 
    Bijgewerkt op: 
     
    Gecreëerd:   

    Rule of Law in Poland: concerns continue to grow among MEPs 

    Persbericht 
    Bijgewerkt op: 
     
    Gecreëerd:   

    Rule of Law in Poland: concerns continue to grow among MEPs 

    Rule of Law in Poland: concerns continue to grow among MEPs 
    Rule of Law in Poland: concerns continue to grow among MEPs 
    Persbericht 
    Bijgewerkt op: 
     
    Gecreëerd:   
    Persbericht 
    Persbericht  LIBE  LIBELIBE  Bijgewerkt op: 
     
    Bijgewerkt op: Bijgewerkt op: 
     
     
    Gecreëerd:   
    Gecreëerd: Gecreëerd:     
     
    • Continuing and systematic attacks against judicial independence, democratic institutions and minority rights 
    • Calls for the expansion of ongoing Article 7 proceedings to address additional concerns 
    • Need for immediate action by Council and Commission, including budgetary measures, to protect EU core values 

    The attacks on the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights in Poland need to be addressed urgently, say a majority of MEPs in the Civil Liberties Committee.

    In a committee debate on Monday, Juan Fernando López Aguilar (S&D, ES) presented his draft interim report on the December 2017 European Commission proposal to act in view of the perceived threats to the independence of the judiciary in Poland. He pointed to the recent worrying developments in the country related to the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights.


    Judicial independence, democratic institutions and fundamental rights under threat


    Afterwards, the President of the European Association of Judges, José Igreja Matos, and a representative of the Polish judges association IUSTITIA, Joanna Hetnarowicz-Sikora, presented a series of concerns linked primarily to judicial independence and the rule of law. They also mentioned other worries around democracy and elections, as well as fundamental rights (especially those of minorities), such as the freedom of speech and assembly, and their curtailment in light of the pandemic.


    Most MEPs shared the concern over the state of EU core values in the country. They referred to a systematic and continuing attack against judicial independence and democratic institutions, which poses a threat to the very structure of the EU, and called for decisive action by the Council and the Commission, including budgetary measures, in order to protect EU core values.


    Some speakers mentioned that further input from the Polish authorities is necessary to have a balanced debate, while several references were made to the need for an independent, permanent EU mechanism to ensure that monitoring processes in the area of rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights remain impartial and objective.


    Next steps

    MEPs have until 28 May to table amendments to the draft interim report. The committee will vote on the text in July, with the plenary vote scheduled in September 2020.

    Background


    Parliament agrees with the Commission that rule of law is at risk in Poland, which faces multiple infringement proceedings for this reason (with the latest one initiated on 29 April), but the Council has so far not taken a formal step in that regard.


    According to Article 7 of the Treaty of the EU, the Council may determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach of EU values. Before doing so, ministers shall hear the views of the national authorities. The Polish authorities have presented their positions in front of the Council on three occasions, between June and December 2018.


    At a later stage, the European Council may determine, by unanimity and with the Parliament’s consent, that there is a serious and persistent breach of the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights. This could eventually lead to sanctions, including suspension of voting rights in the Council.


    In its resolution of 17 April about the EU’s response against COVID-19, the European Parliament pointed to recent moves by the Polish authorities to change the electoral code in order to hold Presidential elections in the middle of a pandemic. MEPs warned this may “undermine the concept of free, equal, direct and secret elections as enshrined in the Polish Constitution”.

    A recording of the debate is available by clicking here.


     
     
    • Continuing and systematic attacks against judicial independence, democratic institutions and minority rights 
    • Calls for the expansion of ongoing Article 7 proceedings to address additional concerns 
    • Need for immediate action by Council and Commission, including budgetary measures, to protect EU core values 

    The attacks on the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights in Poland need to be addressed urgently, say a majority of MEPs in the Civil Liberties Committee.

    In a committee debate on Monday, Juan Fernando López Aguilar (S&D, ES) presented his draft interim report on the December 2017 European Commission proposal to act in view of the perceived threats to the independence of the judiciary in Poland. He pointed to the recent worrying developments in the country related to the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights.


    Judicial independence, democratic institutions and fundamental rights under threat


    Afterwards, the President of the European Association of Judges, José Igreja Matos, and a representative of the Polish judges association IUSTITIA, Joanna Hetnarowicz-Sikora, presented a series of concerns linked primarily to judicial independence and the rule of law. They also mentioned other worries around democracy and elections, as well as fundamental rights (especially those of minorities), such as the freedom of speech and assembly, and their curtailment in light of the pandemic.


    Most MEPs shared the concern over the state of EU core values in the country. They referred to a systematic and continuing attack against judicial independence and democratic institutions, which poses a threat to the very structure of the EU, and called for decisive action by the Council and the Commission, including budgetary measures, in order to protect EU core values.


    Some speakers mentioned that further input from the Polish authorities is necessary to have a balanced debate, while several references were made to the need for an independent, permanent EU mechanism to ensure that monitoring processes in the area of rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights remain impartial and objective.


    Next steps

    MEPs have until 28 May to table amendments to the draft interim report. The committee will vote on the text in July, with the plenary vote scheduled in September 2020.

    Background


    Parliament agrees with the Commission that rule of law is at risk in Poland, which faces multiple infringement proceedings for this reason (with the latest one initiated on 29 April), but the Council has so far not taken a formal step in that regard.


    According to Article 7 of the Treaty of the EU, the Council may determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach of EU values. Before doing so, ministers shall hear the views of the national authorities. The Polish authorities have presented their positions in front of the Council on three occasions, between June and December 2018.


    At a later stage, the European Council may determine, by unanimity and with the Parliament’s consent, that there is a serious and persistent breach of the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights. This could eventually lead to sanctions, including suspension of voting rights in the Council.


    In its resolution of 17 April about the EU’s response against COVID-19, the European Parliament pointed to recent moves by the Polish authorities to change the electoral code in order to hold Presidential elections in the middle of a pandemic. MEPs warned this may “undermine the concept of free, equal, direct and secret elections as enshrined in the Polish Constitution”.

    A recording of the debate is available by clicking here.


     
     
     

    Deel deze pagina: 

    Deel deze pagina: 
    Deel deze pagina: 
  • Facebook Facebook 
  • Twitter Twitter 
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn 
  • Whatsapp Whatsapp 
    • Continuing and systematic attacks against judicial independence, democratic institutions and minority rights 
    • Calls for the expansion of ongoing Article 7 proceedings to address additional concerns 
    • Need for immediate action by Council and Commission, including budgetary measures, to protect EU core values 

    The attacks on the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights in Poland need to be addressed urgently, say a majority of MEPs in the Civil Liberties Committee.

    In a committee debate on Monday, Juan Fernando López Aguilar (S&D, ES) presented his draft interim report on the December 2017 European Commission proposal to act in view of the perceived threats to the independence of the judiciary in Poland. He pointed to the recent worrying developments in the country related to the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights.


    Judicial independence, democratic institutions and fundamental rights under threat


    Afterwards, the President of the European Association of Judges, José Igreja Matos, and a representative of the Polish judges association IUSTITIA, Joanna Hetnarowicz-Sikora, presented a series of concerns linked primarily to judicial independence and the rule of law. They also mentioned other worries around democracy and elections, as well as fundamental rights (especially those of minorities), such as the freedom of speech and assembly, and their curtailment in light of the pandemic.


    Most MEPs shared the concern over the state of EU core values in the country. They referred to a systematic and continuing attack against judicial independence and democratic institutions, which poses a threat to the very structure of the EU, and called for decisive action by the Council and the Commission, including budgetary measures, in order to protect EU core values.


    Some speakers mentioned that further input from the Polish authorities is necessary to have a balanced debate, while several references were made to the need for an independent, permanent EU mechanism to ensure that monitoring processes in the area of rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights remain impartial and objective.


    Next steps

    MEPs have until 28 May to table amendments to the draft interim report. The committee will vote on the text in July, with the plenary vote scheduled in September 2020.

    Background


    Parliament agrees with the Commission that rule of law is at risk in Poland, which faces multiple infringement proceedings for this reason (with the latest one initiated on 29 April), but the Council has so far not taken a formal step in that regard.


    According to Article 7 of the Treaty of the EU, the Council may determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach of EU values. Before doing so, ministers shall hear the views of the national authorities. The Polish authorities have presented their positions in front of the Council on three occasions, between June and December 2018.


    At a later stage, the European Council may determine, by unanimity and with the Parliament’s consent, that there is a serious and persistent breach of the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights. This could eventually lead to sanctions, including suspension of voting rights in the Council.


    In its resolution of 17 April about the EU’s response against COVID-19, the European Parliament pointed to recent moves by the Polish authorities to change the electoral code in order to hold Presidential elections in the middle of a pandemic. MEPs warned this may “undermine the concept of free, equal, direct and secret elections as enshrined in the Polish Constitution”.

    A recording of the debate is available by clicking here.


    • Continuing and systematic attacks against judicial independence, democratic institutions and minority rights 
    • Calls for the expansion of ongoing Article 7 proceedings to address additional concerns 
    • Need for immediate action by Council and Commission, including budgetary measures, to protect EU core values 

    The attacks on the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights in Poland need to be addressed urgently, say a majority of MEPs in the Civil Liberties Committee.

    In a committee debate on Monday, Juan Fernando López Aguilar (S&D, ES) presented his draft interim report on the December 2017 European Commission proposal to act in view of the perceived threats to the independence of the judiciary in Poland. He pointed to the recent worrying developments in the country related to the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights.


    Judicial independence, democratic institutions and fundamental rights under threat


    Afterwards, the President of the European Association of Judges, José Igreja Matos, and a representative of the Polish judges association IUSTITIA, Joanna Hetnarowicz-Sikora, presented a series of concerns linked primarily to judicial independence and the rule of law. They also mentioned other worries around democracy and elections, as well as fundamental rights (especially those of minorities), such as the freedom of speech and assembly, and their curtailment in light of the pandemic.


    Most MEPs shared the concern over the state of EU core values in the country. They referred to a systematic and continuing attack against judicial independence and democratic institutions, which poses a threat to the very structure of the EU, and called for decisive action by the Council and the Commission, including budgetary measures, in order to protect EU core values.


    Some speakers mentioned that further input from the Polish authorities is necessary to have a balanced debate, while several references were made to the need for an independent, permanent EU mechanism to ensure that monitoring processes in the area of rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights remain impartial and objective.


    Next steps

    MEPs have until 28 May to table amendments to the draft interim report. The committee will vote on the text in July, with the plenary vote scheduled in September 2020.

    Background


    Parliament agrees with the Commission that rule of law is at risk in Poland, which faces multiple infringement proceedings for this reason (with the latest one initiated on 29 April), but the Council has so far not taken a formal step in that regard.


    According to Article 7 of the Treaty of the EU, the Council may determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach of EU values. Before doing so, ministers shall hear the views of the national authorities. The Polish authorities have presented their positions in front of the Council on three occasions, between June and December 2018.


    At a later stage, the European Council may determine, by unanimity and with the Parliament’s consent, that there is a serious and persistent breach of the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights. This could eventually lead to sanctions, including suspension of voting rights in the Council.


    In its resolution of 17 April about the EU’s response against COVID-19, the European Parliament pointed to recent moves by the Polish authorities to change the electoral code in order to hold Presidential elections in the middle of a pandemic. MEPs warned this may “undermine the concept of free, equal, direct and secret elections as enshrined in the Polish Constitution”.

    A recording of the debate is available by clicking here.


    • Continuing and systematic attacks against judicial independence, democratic institutions and minority rights 
    • Calls for the expansion of ongoing Article 7 proceedings to address additional concerns 
    • Need for immediate action by Council and Commission, including budgetary measures, to protect EU core values 

    The attacks on the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights in Poland need to be addressed urgently, say a majority of MEPs in the Civil Liberties Committee.

    In a committee debate on Monday, Juan Fernando López Aguilar (S&D, ES) presented his draft interim report on the December 2017 European Commission proposal to act in view of the perceived threats to the independence of the judiciary in Poland. He pointed to the recent worrying developments in the country related to the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights.


    Judicial independence, democratic institutions and fundamental rights under threat


    Afterwards, the President of the European Association of Judges, José Igreja Matos, and a representative of the Polish judges association IUSTITIA, Joanna Hetnarowicz-Sikora, presented a series of concerns linked primarily to judicial independence and the rule of law. They also mentioned other worries around democracy and elections, as well as fundamental rights (especially those of minorities), such as the freedom of speech and assembly, and their curtailment in light of the pandemic.


    Most MEPs shared the concern over the state of EU core values in the country. They referred to a systematic and continuing attack against judicial independence and democratic institutions, which poses a threat to the very structure of the EU, and called for decisive action by the Council and the Commission, including budgetary measures, in order to protect EU core values.


    Some speakers mentioned that further input from the Polish authorities is necessary to have a balanced debate, while several references were made to the need for an independent, permanent EU mechanism to ensure that monitoring processes in the area of rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights remain impartial and objective.


    Next steps

    MEPs have until 28 May to table amendments to the draft interim report. The committee will vote on the text in July, with the plenary vote scheduled in September 2020.

    Background


    Parliament agrees with the Commission that rule of law is at risk in Poland, which faces multiple infringement proceedings for this reason (with the latest one initiated on 29 April), but the Council has so far not taken a formal step in that regard.


    According to Article 7 of the Treaty of the EU, the Council may determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach of EU values. Before doing so, ministers shall hear the views of the national authorities. The Polish authorities have presented their positions in front of the Council on three occasions, between June and December 2018.


    At a later stage, the European Council may determine, by unanimity and with the Parliament’s consent, that there is a serious and persistent breach of the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights. This could eventually lead to sanctions, including suspension of voting rights in the Council.


    In its resolution of 17 April about the EU’s response against COVID-19, the European Parliament pointed to recent moves by the Polish authorities to change the electoral code in order to hold Presidential elections in the middle of a pandemic. MEPs warned this may “undermine the concept of free, equal, direct and secret elections as enshrined in the Polish Constitution”.

    A recording of the debate is available by clicking here.


    • Continuing and systematic attacks against judicial independence, democratic institutions and minority rights 
    • Calls for the expansion of ongoing Article 7 proceedings to address additional concerns 
    • Need for immediate action by Council and Commission, including budgetary measures, to protect EU core values 
    • Continuing and systematic attacks against judicial independence, democratic institutions and minority rights 
    • Calls for the expansion of ongoing Article 7 proceedings to address additional concerns 
    • Need for immediate action by Council and Commission, including budgetary measures, to protect EU core values 
    • Continuing and systematic attacks against judicial independence, democratic institutions and minority rights 
    • Calls for the expansion of ongoing Article 7 proceedings to address additional concerns 
    • Need for immediate action by Council and Commission, including budgetary measures, to protect EU core values 
    • Continuing and systematic attacks against judicial independence, democratic institutions and minority rights 
    • Calls for the expansion of ongoing Article 7 proceedings to address additional concerns 
    • Need for immediate action by Council and Commission, including budgetary measures, to protect EU core values 
    • Continuing and systematic attacks against judicial independence, democratic institutions and minority rights 
    • Calls for the expansion of ongoing Article 7 proceedings to address additional concerns 
    • Need for immediate action by Council and Commission, including budgetary measures, to protect EU core values 
  • Continuing and systematic attacks against judicial independence, democratic institutions and minority rights 
  • Continuing and systematic attacks against judicial independence, democratic institutions and minority rights 
    Continuing and systematic attacks against judicial independence, democratic institutions and minority rights 
  • Calls for the expansion of ongoing Article 7 proceedings to address additional concerns 
  • Calls for the expansion of ongoing Article 7 proceedings to address additional concerns 
    Calls for the expansion of ongoing Article 7 proceedings to address additional concerns 
  • Need for immediate action by Council and Commission, including budgetary measures, to protect EU core values 
  • Need for immediate action by Council and Commission, including budgetary measures, to protect EU core values 
    Need for immediate action by Council and Commission, including budgetary measures, to protect EU core values 

    The attacks on the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights in Poland need to be addressed urgently, say a majority of MEPs in the Civil Liberties Committee.

    The attacks on the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights in Poland need to be addressed urgently, say a majority of MEPs in the Civil Liberties Committee.

    The attacks on the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights in Poland need to be addressed urgently, say a majority of MEPs in the Civil Liberties Committee.

    The attacks on the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights in Poland need to be addressed urgently, say a majority of MEPs in the Civil Liberties Committee.

    In a committee debate on Monday, Juan Fernando López Aguilar (S&D, ES) presented his draft interim report on the December 2017 European Commission proposal to act in view of the perceived threats to the independence of the judiciary in Poland. He pointed to the recent worrying developments in the country related to the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights.


    Judicial independence, democratic institutions and fundamental rights under threat


    Afterwards, the President of the European Association of Judges, José Igreja Matos, and a representative of the Polish judges association IUSTITIA, Joanna Hetnarowicz-Sikora, presented a series of concerns linked primarily to judicial independence and the rule of law. They also mentioned other worries around democracy and elections, as well as fundamental rights (especially those of minorities), such as the freedom of speech and assembly, and their curtailment in light of the pandemic.


    Most MEPs shared the concern over the state of EU core values in the country. They referred to a systematic and continuing attack against judicial independence and democratic institutions, which poses a threat to the very structure of the EU, and called for decisive action by the Council and the Commission, including budgetary measures, in order to protect EU core values.


    Some speakers mentioned that further input from the Polish authorities is necessary to have a balanced debate, while several references were made to the need for an independent, permanent EU mechanism to ensure that monitoring processes in the area of rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights remain impartial and objective.


    Next steps

    MEPs have until 28 May to table amendments to the draft interim report. The committee will vote on the text in July, with the plenary vote scheduled in September 2020.

    Background


    Parliament agrees with the Commission that rule of law is at risk in Poland, which faces multiple infringement proceedings for this reason (with the latest one initiated on 29 April), but the Council has so far not taken a formal step in that regard.


    According to Article 7 of the Treaty of the EU, the Council may determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach of EU values. Before doing so, ministers shall hear the views of the national authorities. The Polish authorities have presented their positions in front of the Council on three occasions, between June and December 2018.


    At a later stage, the European Council may determine, by unanimity and with the Parliament’s consent, that there is a serious and persistent breach of the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights. This could eventually lead to sanctions, including suspension of voting rights in the Council.


    In its resolution of 17 April about the EU’s response against COVID-19, the European Parliament pointed to recent moves by the Polish authorities to change the electoral code in order to hold Presidential elections in the middle of a pandemic. MEPs warned this may “undermine the concept of free, equal, direct and secret elections as enshrined in the Polish Constitution”.

    A recording of the debate is available by clicking here.


    In a committee debate on Monday, Juan Fernando López Aguilar (S&D, ES) presented his draft interim report on the December 2017 European Commission proposal to act in view of the perceived threats to the independence of the judiciary in Poland. He pointed to the recent worrying developments in the country related to the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights.


    Judicial independence, democratic institutions and fundamental rights under threat


    Afterwards, the President of the European Association of Judges, José Igreja Matos, and a representative of the Polish judges association IUSTITIA, Joanna Hetnarowicz-Sikora, presented a series of concerns linked primarily to judicial independence and the rule of law. They also mentioned other worries around democracy and elections, as well as fundamental rights (especially those of minorities), such as the freedom of speech and assembly, and their curtailment in light of the pandemic.


    Most MEPs shared the concern over the state of EU core values in the country. They referred to a systematic and continuing attack against judicial independence and democratic institutions, which poses a threat to the very structure of the EU, and called for decisive action by the Council and the Commission, including budgetary measures, in order to protect EU core values.


    Some speakers mentioned that further input from the Polish authorities is necessary to have a balanced debate, while several references were made to the need for an independent, permanent EU mechanism to ensure that monitoring processes in the area of rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights remain impartial and objective.


    Next steps

    MEPs have until 28 May to table amendments to the draft interim report. The committee will vote on the text in July, with the plenary vote scheduled in September 2020.

    Background


    Parliament agrees with the Commission that rule of law is at risk in Poland, which faces multiple infringement proceedings for this reason (with the latest one initiated on 29 April), but the Council has so far not taken a formal step in that regard.


    According to Article 7 of the Treaty of the EU, the Council may determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach of EU values. Before doing so, ministers shall hear the views of the national authorities. The Polish authorities have presented their positions in front of the Council on three occasions, between June and December 2018.


    At a later stage, the European Council may determine, by unanimity and with the Parliament’s consent, that there is a serious and persistent breach of the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights. This could eventually lead to sanctions, including suspension of voting rights in the Council.


    In its resolution of 17 April about the EU’s response against COVID-19, the European Parliament pointed to recent moves by the Polish authorities to change the electoral code in order to hold Presidential elections in the middle of a pandemic. MEPs warned this may “undermine the concept of free, equal, direct and secret elections as enshrined in the Polish Constitution”.

    A recording of the debate is available by clicking here.


    In a committee debate on Monday, Juan Fernando López Aguilar (S&D, ES) presented his draft interim report on the December 2017 European Commission proposal to act in view of the perceived threats to the independence of the judiciary in Poland. He pointed to the recent worrying developments in the country related to the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights.


    Judicial independence, democratic institutions and fundamental rights under threat


    Afterwards, the President of the European Association of Judges, José Igreja Matos, and a representative of the Polish judges association IUSTITIA, Joanna Hetnarowicz-Sikora, presented a series of concerns linked primarily to judicial independence and the rule of law. They also mentioned other worries around democracy and elections, as well as fundamental rights (especially those of minorities), such as the freedom of speech and assembly, and their curtailment in light of the pandemic.


    Most MEPs shared the concern over the state of EU core values in the country. They referred to a systematic and continuing attack against judicial independence and democratic institutions, which poses a threat to the very structure of the EU, and called for decisive action by the Council and the Commission, including budgetary measures, in order to protect EU core values.


    Some speakers mentioned that further input from the Polish authorities is necessary to have a balanced debate, while several references were made to the need for an independent, permanent EU mechanism to ensure that monitoring processes in the area of rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights remain impartial and objective.


    Next steps

    MEPs have until 28 May to table amendments to the draft interim report. The committee will vote on the text in July, with the plenary vote scheduled in September 2020.

    Background


    Parliament agrees with the Commission that rule of law is at risk in Poland, which faces multiple infringement proceedings for this reason (with the latest one initiated on 29 April), but the Council has so far not taken a formal step in that regard.


    According to Article 7 of the Treaty of the EU, the Council may determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach of EU values. Before doing so, ministers shall hear the views of the national authorities. The Polish authorities have presented their positions in front of the Council on three occasions, between June and December 2018.


    At a later stage, the European Council may determine, by unanimity and with the Parliament’s consent, that there is a serious and persistent breach of the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights. This could eventually lead to sanctions, including suspension of voting rights in the Council.


    In its resolution of 17 April about the EU’s response against COVID-19, the European Parliament pointed to recent moves by the Polish authorities to change the electoral code in order to hold Presidential elections in the middle of a pandemic. MEPs warned this may “undermine the concept of free, equal, direct and secret elections as enshrined in the Polish Constitution”.

    A recording of the debate is available by clicking here.


    In a committee debate on Monday, Juan Fernando López Aguilar (S&D, ES) presented his draft interim report on the December 2017 European Commission proposal to act in view of the perceived threats to the independence of the judiciary in Poland. He pointed to the recent worrying developments in the country related to the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights.

    Juan Fernando López Aguilardraft interim reportEuropean Commission proposal

    Judicial independence, democratic institutions and fundamental rights under threat

    Judicial independence, democratic institutions and fundamental rights under threat

    Afterwards, the President of the European Association of Judges, José Igreja Matos, and a representative of the Polish judges association IUSTITIA, Joanna Hetnarowicz-Sikora, presented a series of concerns linked primarily to judicial independence and the rule of law. They also mentioned other worries around democracy and elections, as well as fundamental rights (especially those of minorities), such as the freedom of speech and assembly, and their curtailment in light of the pandemic.


    Most MEPs shared the concern over the state of EU core values in the country. They referred to a systematic and continuing attack against judicial independence and democratic institutions, which poses a threat to the very structure of the EU, and called for decisive action by the Council and the Commission, including budgetary measures, in order to protect EU core values.


    Some speakers mentioned that further input from the Polish authorities is necessary to have a balanced debate, while several references were made to the need for an independent, permanent EU mechanism to ensure that monitoring processes in the area of rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights remain impartial and objective.


    Next steps

    Next steps

    MEPs have until 28 May to table amendments to the draft interim report. The committee will vote on the text in July, with the plenary vote scheduled in September 2020.

    Background

    Background

    Parliament agrees with the Commission that rule of law is at risk in Poland, which faces multiple infringement proceedings for this reason (with the latest one initiated on 29 April), but the Council has so far not taken a formal step in that regard.

    Parliament agreesinitiated on 29 April

    According to Article 7 of the Treaty of the EU, the Council may determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach of EU values. Before doing so, ministers shall hear the views of the national authorities. The Polish authorities have presented their positions in front of the Council on three occasions, between June and December 2018.

    Article 7 of the Treaty of the EU

    At a later stage, the European Council may determine, by unanimity and with the Parliament’s consent, that there is a serious and persistent breach of the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights. This could eventually lead to sanctions, including suspension of voting rights in the Council.


    In its resolution of 17 April about the EU’s response against COVID-19, the European Parliament pointed to recent moves by the Polish authorities to change the electoral code in order to hold Presidential elections in the middle of a pandemic. MEPs warned this may “undermine the concept of free, equal, direct and secret elections as enshrined in the Polish Constitution”.

    about the EU’s response against COVID-19

    A recording of the debate is available by clicking here.

    clicking here

    Contact: 

    Contact: 
    Contact: 
  • Kyriakos KLOSIDIS 

    Kyriakos KLOSIDIS Kyriakos KLOSIDIS 
    Press Officer 
    Press Officer Press Officer 
    Contactgegevens: 
    Contactgegevens: 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+32) 2 28 32357 (BXL) 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+32) 2 28 32357 (BXL) Telefoonnummer: (+32) 2 28 32357 (BXL)Telefoonnummer: (BXL) 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+33) 3 881 74651 (STR) 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+33) 3 881 74651 (STR) Telefoonnummer: (+33) 3 881 74651 (STR)Telefoonnummer: (STR) 
  • Mobiel telefoonnummer: (+32) 470 96 47 35 
  • Mobiel telefoonnummer: (+32) 470 96 47 35 Mobiel telefoonnummer: (+32) 470 96 47 35Mobiel telefoonnummer:  
  • E-mail: kyriakos.klosidis@europarl.europa.eu 
  • E-mail: kyriakos.klosidis@europarl.europa.eu E-mail: kyriakos.klosidis@europarl.europa.euE-mail:  
  • E-mail: libe-press@europarl.europa.eu 
  • E-mail: libe-press@europarl.europa.eu E-mail: libe-press@europarl.europa.euE-mail:  
  • Twitteraccount: @EP_Justice 
  • Twitteraccount: @EP_Justice Twitteraccount: @EP_JusticeTwitteraccount:  
  • Estefanía NARRILLOS 

    Estefanía NARRILLOS Estefanía NARRILLOS 
    Press Officer 
    Press Officer Press Officer 
    Contactgegevens: 
    Contactgegevens: 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+32) 2 28 31324 (BXL) 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+32) 2 28 31324 (BXL) Telefoonnummer: (+32) 2 28 31324 (BXL)Telefoonnummer: (BXL) 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+33) 3 881 73661 (STR) 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+33) 3 881 73661 (STR) Telefoonnummer: (+33) 3 881 73661 (STR)Telefoonnummer: (STR) 
  • Mobiel telefoonnummer: (+32) 498 98 39 85 
  • Mobiel telefoonnummer: (+32) 498 98 39 85 Mobiel telefoonnummer: (+32) 498 98 39 85Mobiel telefoonnummer:  
  • E-mail: estefania.narrillos@europarl.europa.eu 
  • E-mail: estefania.narrillos@europarl.europa.eu E-mail: estefania.narrillos@europarl.europa.euE-mail:  
     
     

    Further information 

    Further information 
    Further information 
  • Draft interim report on the proposal for a Council decision on the determination of a clear risk of a serious breach by the Republic of Poland of the rule of law   Draft interim report on the proposal for a Council decision on the determination of a clear risk of a serious breach by the Republic of Poland of the rule of law  
  • The pandemic is no excuse to weaken democracy and the rule of law, MEPs say (EP press release, 23.04.2020)   The pandemic is no excuse to weaken democracy and the rule of law, MEPs say (EP press release, 23.04.2020)  
  • Rule of law in Poland and Hungary has worsened (EP press release, 16.01.2020)   Rule of law in Poland and Hungary has worsened (EP press release, 16.01.2020)  
  • Rule of law concerns in member states: how the EU can act (infographic)   Rule of law concerns in member states: how the EU can act (infographic)  
  • EPRS Briefing: Protecting the rule of law in the EU: Existing mechanisms and possible improvements   EPRS Briefing: Protecting the rule of law in the EU: Existing mechanisms and possible improvements  
  • EPRS Briefing: European added value of an EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights - Preliminary assessment (23.04.2020)   EPRS Briefing: European added value of an EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights - Preliminary assessment (23.04.2020)  
  • EPRS Briefing: The Impact of Covid-19 Measures on Democracy, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights in the EU   EPRS Briefing: The Impact of Covid-19 Measures on Democracy, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights in the EU  
  • EP Multimedia Centre: free photos, video and audio material   EP Multimedia Centre: free photos, video and audio material  
  • Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs  Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 
     
     
     
     
     

    Productinformatie 

    REF.:  20200520IPR79509 

    Productinformatie 

    Productinformatie 
    Productinformatie 
    Productinformatie 
    REF.:  20200520IPR79509 
    REF.:  20200520IPR79509 
    REF.: REF.:REF.: 20200520IPR79509 20200520IPR79509 

    Deel deze pagina: 

    Deel deze pagina: 
    Deel deze pagina: 
  • Facebook Facebook 
  • Twitter Twitter 
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn 
  • Whatsapp Whatsapp Aanmelden voor e-mailupdatesAanmelden voor e-mailupdatesPdf-versie Pdf-versie 

    Footer 

    Footer Nieuws  Bekijk het menu: nieuws  Bekijk het menu: nieuws 
    Het Parlement in uw land 
  • Brussels  
  • Brussels   Brussels 
  • Den Haag  
  • Den Haag   Den Haag Tools 
  • Wetgevingsobservatorium  
  • Wetgevingsobservatorium   Wetgevingsobservatorium 
  • Multimedia Centre  
  • Multimedia Centre   Multimedia Centre 
  • EbS  
  • EbS   EbS 
    De Voorzitter van het Europees Parlement 
  • Webpagina van de Voorzitter van het Parlement  
  • Webpagina van de Voorzitter van het Parlement   Webpagina van de Voorzitter van het Parlement  Menu verbergen: Nieuws   Menu verbergen: Nieuws Europees Parlement  Menu bekijken: Europees Parlement   Menu bekijken: Europees Parlement 
  • Nieuws 
  • Nieuws  Nieuws 
  • Leden 
  • Leden  Leden 
  • Over het Parlement 
  • Over het Parlement  Over het Parlement 
  • Plenaire vergadering 
  • Plenaire vergadering  Plenaire vergadering 
  • Commissies 
  • Commissies  Commissies 
  • Delegaties 
  • Delegaties  Delegaties Menu verbergen: Europees Parlement Menu verbergen: Europees Parlement  

    Het Parlement in de sociale media  

    Het Parlement in de sociale media 
  • Facebook  
  • Facebook   Facebook 
  • Twitter  
  • Twitter   Twitter 
  • Facebook  
  • Facebook   Facebook 
  • LinkedIn  
  • LinkedIn   LinkedIn 
  • YouTube  
  • YouTube   YouTube 
  • Instagram  
  • Instagram   Instagram 
  • Pinterest  
  • Pinterest   Pinterest 
  • Snapchat  
  • Snapchat   Snapchat 
  • Reddit  
  • Reddit   Reddit Informatieve links 
  • Contact 
  • Contact Contact 
  • RSS 
  • RSS RSS 
  • Sitemap 
  • Sitemap Sitemap 
  • Juridische mededeling - Privacybeleid 
  • Juridische mededeling - Privacybeleid Juridische mededeling - Privacybeleid 
  • Toegankelijkheid 
  • Toegankelijkheid Toegankelijkheid