EP negotiators: recovery plan crucial, but do not trade long-term for short-term | Nieuws | Europees Parlement

Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
 
  • The €750 billion borrowing plan is an important proposal for an efficient recovery
  • Recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the MFF, MEPs said in reaction to the Commission’s long-term budget and recovery plan proposals
  • Danger of weakened EU budget after recovery phase, preventing EU from investing in common future
  • Parliament ready to reject any proposals that would not meet its standards

It is high time to start negotiations on the MFF with the Council without delay, said the EP’s negotiating team for the long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform.

The six members of the MFF/OR negotiating team commented on the Commission’s proposals for a revised Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and recovery plan presented on Wednesday in an extraordinary plenary session:

“We will carefully assess the package of proposals presented by the European Commission today. We positively acknowledge the reinforcement of the current MFF in 2020 and the significant borrowing which are much needed.

Today’s Commission proposals are an important step. We therefore regret that the Commission has reduced its original MFF proposal, thus moving further away from Parliament and closer to the European Council President’s February 2020 proposal. Once the recovery phase is behind us, this could leave us with a weakened budget that prevents the EU from investing in its common future - such as climate and digital transformation -, leaving it more vulnerable to further crises.

Parliament shares the view that the recovery plan will be channelled through the MFF and must be embedded in a reformed system of own resources. But it would be self-defeating to trade the long-term against the short-term: the recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the core MFF and its wider objectives, which the COVID-19 outbreak has made more relevant than ever. Furthermore, any new budgetary tool must ensure Parliament’s participation and the community method to boost democratic oversight, transparency and accountability.

We express, however, our concerns about future debt and the way it will be repaid in the future.

Parliament agrees with the general approach that the long-term repayment of the borrowing should be re-financed by new, genuine own resources in order to use European, rather than ever more national means to finance our needs and thus to avoid a new dividing line between net contributors and net recipients. We regret, however, that the Commission is only putting forward a menu of possible revenue sources rather than submitting concrete legislative initiatives for a basket of new own resources as requested by Parliament, which would also have immediate economic and policy benefits as of 2021. Parliament recalls its consent is conditional on the introduction of a basket of new own resources without further delay.

Parliament must give its consent to any new MFF, and stands ready to do so if the final agreement will include its main priorities and will genuinely provide for Parliament’s participation. We call on the Council to work constructively with Parliament on improving the Commission’s proposals.

Failing an agreement before the end of the year, 2020 ceilings would be automatically extended. That is why Parliament has formally requested that the Commission present an MFF contingency plan in order to eliminate any risk of discontinuity or disorderly extension. A contingency plan based on 2020 ceilings could indeed provide a better basis for the European Union’s recovery than a late and inadequate MFF.

Since November 2018, we have repeatedly expressed our readiness to engage with the Council on the MFF and the Own Resources, to no avail. Given how urgent this is, it is high time to start these negotiations without further delay.”



The EP's negotiating team for the next long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform


Johan Van Overtveldt (ECR, BE), Chair of the Committee on Budgets

Jan Olbrycht (EPP, PL), MFF co-rapporteur

Margarida Marques (S&D, PT), MFF co-rapporteur

José Manuel Fernandes (EPP, PT), Own Resources co-rapporteur

Valérie Hayer (RENEW, FR), Own Resources co-rapporteur

Rasmus Andresen (Greens/EFA, DE)

Follow them on Twitter: https://twitter.com/EP_Budgets/lists/mff-negotiation-team

 
Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
  • Direct naar de inhoud van de pagina (druk op "Enter") 
  • Direct naar de inhoud van de pagina (druk op "Enter") Direct naar de inhoud van de pagina (druk op "Enter") 
  • Rechtstreeks naar talenmenu (druk op "Enter") 
  • Rechtstreeks naar talenmenu (druk op "Enter") Rechtstreeks naar talenmenu (druk op "Enter") 
  • Rechtstreeks naar zoekmenu (druk op "Enter") 
  • Rechtstreeks naar zoekmenu (druk op "Enter") Rechtstreeks naar zoekmenu (druk op "Enter")  Europees Parlement  Europees Parlement  Nieuws  Nieuws  
    Navigatiebalk (Menu)  
    Navigatiebalk (Menu)  
    Navigatiebalk (Menu)   Navigatiebalk (Menu) Navigatiebalk ()  Navigatiebalk (Menu)   Navigatiebalk (Menu) Navigatiebalk () 
    1. Nieuws  Nieuws 
    2. Pers  Pers 
    3. Agenda  Agenda 
  • Nieuws  Nieuws 
  • Nieuws  Nieuws 
    Nieuws Nieuws Nieuws Nieuws 
    Startpagina  Startpagina  Categorie:Europese zaken  Categorie:Europese zakenCategorie:  Categorie:Wereld  Categorie:WereldCategorie:  Categorie:Economie  Categorie:EconomieCategorie:  Categorie:Maatschappij  Categorie:MaatschappijCategorie:  Categorie:Veiligheid  Categorie:VeiligheidCategorie:  Menu sluiten  Menu sluiten 
  • Pers  Pers 
  • Pers  Pers 
    Pers Pers  Pers  Pers 
    Startpagina   Startpagina Accreditatie Accreditatie Contact Contact Close(Pers) Close(Pers)(Pers) 
  • Agenda  Agenda 
  • Agenda  Agenda 
    Agenda Agenda  Agenda  Agenda 
    Hoogtepunten Hoogtepunten Wekelijkse agenda Wekelijkse agenda Briefing Briefing Menu sluiten Menu sluiten  Veelgestelde vragen  Veelgestelde vragen  #EuropeanenTegenCovid19  #EuropeanenTegenCovid19  Sluit de navigatiebalk(Menu)  Sluit de navigatiebalk(Menu)Sluit de navigatiebalk()   
    Naar het zoekveld   Naar het zoekveld Search 
    Zoekopdracht starten  Sluit het zoekveld   Sluit het zoekveld 
    Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
    Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
    Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
    Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
    Taal kiezen 
    Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
    Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
    Huidige taal:NL - Nederlands Selecteer 
    Andere websites 
    Andere websites bekijken  Andere websites bekijken 
    Andere websites 
    Andere websites  Andere websites bekijken  Andere websites bekijken  Andere websites bekijken  Andere websites bekijken 
    1. Nieuws 
    2. Leden 
    3. Over het Parlement 
    4. Plenaire vergadering 
    5. Commissies 
    6. Delegaties 
    7. Andere websitesMeer 
      View Andere websitesMeer  Andere websitesMeer 
  • Nieuws 
  • Nieuws  Nieuws 
  • Leden 
  • Leden  Leden 
  • Over het Parlement 
  • Over het Parlement  Over het Parlement 
  • Plenaire vergadering 
  • Plenaire vergadering  Plenaire vergadering 
  • Commissies 
  • Commissies  Commissies 
  • Delegaties 
  • Delegaties  Delegaties 
  • Andere websitesMeer 
    View Andere websitesMeer  Andere websitesMeer 
  • Andere websitesMeer 
    View Andere websitesMeer  Andere websitesMeer 
    Andere websitesMeer 
    Andere websitesMeerAndere websitesMeer View Andere websitesMeer View Andere websitesMeerView Andere websitesMeer Andere websitesMeer Andere websitesMeerAndere websitesMeer 
    1. Multimedia Centre 
    2. Webpagina van de Voorzitter 
    3. Secretariaat-generaal 
    4. Think tank 
    5. EP Newshub 
    6. Tot uw dienst 
    7. Bezoeken 
    8. Legislative train 
    9. Contracten en subsidies 
    10. Registreren 
  • Multimedia Centre 
  • Multimedia Centre Multimedia Centre 
  • Webpagina van de Voorzitter 
  • Webpagina van de Voorzitter Webpagina van de Voorzitter 
  • Secretariaat-generaal 
  • Secretariaat-generaal Secretariaat-generaal 
  • Think tank 
  • Think tank Think tank 
  • EP Newshub 
  • EP Newshub EP Newshub 
  • Tot uw dienst 
  • Tot uw dienst Tot uw dienst 
  • Bezoeken 
  • Bezoeken Bezoeken 
  • Legislative train 
  • Legislative train Legislative train 
  • Contracten en subsidies 
  • Contracten en subsidies Contracten en subsidies 
  • Registreren 
  • Registreren Registreren Andere websites verbergenAndere websitesMeer Andere websites verbergenAndere websitesMeerAndere websites verbergenAndere websitesMeer  Andere websites verbergen  Andere websites verbergen 
    Pers   > Huidige pagina: EP negotiators: recovery plan crucial, but do not trade long-term for short-term  
    Pers   > Pers  Pers > Huidige pagina: EP negotiators: recovery plan crucial, but do not trade long-term for short-term   Huidige pagina: EP negotiators: recovery plan crucial, but do not trade long-term for short-term   Huidige pagina:EP negotiators: recovery plan crucial, but do not trade long-term for short-term  Pers  Pers >
     
    • The €750 billion borrowing plan is an important proposal for an efficient recovery
    • Recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the MFF, MEPs said in reaction to the Commission’s long-term budget and recovery plan proposals
    • Danger of weakened EU budget after recovery phase, preventing EU from investing in common future
    • Parliament ready to reject any proposals that would not meet its standards

    It is high time to start negotiations on the MFF with the Council without delay, said the EP’s negotiating team for the long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform.

    The six members of the MFF/OR negotiating team commented on the Commission’s proposals for a revised Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and recovery plan presented on Wednesday in an extraordinary plenary session:

    “We will carefully assess the package of proposals presented by the European Commission today. We positively acknowledge the reinforcement of the current MFF in 2020 and the significant borrowing which are much needed.

    Today’s Commission proposals are an important step. We therefore regret that the Commission has reduced its original MFF proposal, thus moving further away from Parliament and closer to the European Council President’s February 2020 proposal. Once the recovery phase is behind us, this could leave us with a weakened budget that prevents the EU from investing in its common future - such as climate and digital transformation -, leaving it more vulnerable to further crises.

    Parliament shares the view that the recovery plan will be channelled through the MFF and must be embedded in a reformed system of own resources. But it would be self-defeating to trade the long-term against the short-term: the recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the core MFF and its wider objectives, which the COVID-19 outbreak has made more relevant than ever. Furthermore, any new budgetary tool must ensure Parliament’s participation and the community method to boost democratic oversight, transparency and accountability.

    We express, however, our concerns about future debt and the way it will be repaid in the future.

    Parliament agrees with the general approach that the long-term repayment of the borrowing should be re-financed by new, genuine own resources in order to use European, rather than ever more national means to finance our needs and thus to avoid a new dividing line between net contributors and net recipients. We regret, however, that the Commission is only putting forward a menu of possible revenue sources rather than submitting concrete legislative initiatives for a basket of new own resources as requested by Parliament, which would also have immediate economic and policy benefits as of 2021. Parliament recalls its consent is conditional on the introduction of a basket of new own resources without further delay.

    Parliament must give its consent to any new MFF, and stands ready to do so if the final agreement will include its main priorities and will genuinely provide for Parliament’s participation. We call on the Council to work constructively with Parliament on improving the Commission’s proposals.

    Failing an agreement before the end of the year, 2020 ceilings would be automatically extended. That is why Parliament has formally requested that the Commission present an MFF contingency plan in order to eliminate any risk of discontinuity or disorderly extension. A contingency plan based on 2020 ceilings could indeed provide a better basis for the European Union’s recovery than a late and inadequate MFF.

    Since November 2018, we have repeatedly expressed our readiness to engage with the Council on the MFF and the Own Resources, to no avail. Given how urgent this is, it is high time to start these negotiations without further delay.”



    The EP's negotiating team for the next long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform


    Johan Van Overtveldt (ECR, BE), Chair of the Committee on Budgets

    Jan Olbrycht (EPP, PL), MFF co-rapporteur

    Margarida Marques (S&D, PT), MFF co-rapporteur

    José Manuel Fernandes (EPP, PT), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Valérie Hayer (RENEW, FR), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Rasmus Andresen (Greens/EFA, DE)

    Follow them on Twitter: https://twitter.com/EP_Budgets/lists/mff-negotiation-team

     
     

    EP negotiators: recovery plan crucial, but do not trade long-term for short-term 

    Persbericht 
     
     
     

    EP negotiators: recovery plan crucial, but do not trade long-term for short-term 

    Persbericht 
     

    EP negotiators: recovery plan crucial, but do not trade long-term for short-term 

    Persbericht 
     

    EP negotiators: recovery plan crucial, but do not trade long-term for short-term 

    Persbericht 
     

    EP negotiators: recovery plan crucial, but do not trade long-term for short-term 

    EP negotiators: recovery plan crucial, but do not trade long-term for short-term 
    EP negotiators: recovery plan crucial, but do not trade long-term for short-term 
    Persbericht 
     
    Persbericht 
    Persbericht  BUDG  BUDGBUDG 
     
     
     
    • The €750 billion borrowing plan is an important proposal for an efficient recovery
    • Recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the MFF, MEPs said in reaction to the Commission’s long-term budget and recovery plan proposals
    • Danger of weakened EU budget after recovery phase, preventing EU from investing in common future
    • Parliament ready to reject any proposals that would not meet its standards

    It is high time to start negotiations on the MFF with the Council without delay, said the EP’s negotiating team for the long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform.

    The six members of the MFF/OR negotiating team commented on the Commission’s proposals for a revised Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and recovery plan presented on Wednesday in an extraordinary plenary session:

    “We will carefully assess the package of proposals presented by the European Commission today. We positively acknowledge the reinforcement of the current MFF in 2020 and the significant borrowing which are much needed.

    Today’s Commission proposals are an important step. We therefore regret that the Commission has reduced its original MFF proposal, thus moving further away from Parliament and closer to the European Council President’s February 2020 proposal. Once the recovery phase is behind us, this could leave us with a weakened budget that prevents the EU from investing in its common future - such as climate and digital transformation -, leaving it more vulnerable to further crises.

    Parliament shares the view that the recovery plan will be channelled through the MFF and must be embedded in a reformed system of own resources. But it would be self-defeating to trade the long-term against the short-term: the recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the core MFF and its wider objectives, which the COVID-19 outbreak has made more relevant than ever. Furthermore, any new budgetary tool must ensure Parliament’s participation and the community method to boost democratic oversight, transparency and accountability.

    We express, however, our concerns about future debt and the way it will be repaid in the future.

    Parliament agrees with the general approach that the long-term repayment of the borrowing should be re-financed by new, genuine own resources in order to use European, rather than ever more national means to finance our needs and thus to avoid a new dividing line between net contributors and net recipients. We regret, however, that the Commission is only putting forward a menu of possible revenue sources rather than submitting concrete legislative initiatives for a basket of new own resources as requested by Parliament, which would also have immediate economic and policy benefits as of 2021. Parliament recalls its consent is conditional on the introduction of a basket of new own resources without further delay.

    Parliament must give its consent to any new MFF, and stands ready to do so if the final agreement will include its main priorities and will genuinely provide for Parliament’s participation. We call on the Council to work constructively with Parliament on improving the Commission’s proposals.

    Failing an agreement before the end of the year, 2020 ceilings would be automatically extended. That is why Parliament has formally requested that the Commission present an MFF contingency plan in order to eliminate any risk of discontinuity or disorderly extension. A contingency plan based on 2020 ceilings could indeed provide a better basis for the European Union’s recovery than a late and inadequate MFF.

    Since November 2018, we have repeatedly expressed our readiness to engage with the Council on the MFF and the Own Resources, to no avail. Given how urgent this is, it is high time to start these negotiations without further delay.”



    The EP's negotiating team for the next long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform


    Johan Van Overtveldt (ECR, BE), Chair of the Committee on Budgets

    Jan Olbrycht (EPP, PL), MFF co-rapporteur

    Margarida Marques (S&D, PT), MFF co-rapporteur

    José Manuel Fernandes (EPP, PT), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Valérie Hayer (RENEW, FR), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Rasmus Andresen (Greens/EFA, DE)

    Follow them on Twitter: https://twitter.com/EP_Budgets/lists/mff-negotiation-team

     
     
    • The €750 billion borrowing plan is an important proposal for an efficient recovery
    • Recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the MFF, MEPs said in reaction to the Commission’s long-term budget and recovery plan proposals
    • Danger of weakened EU budget after recovery phase, preventing EU from investing in common future
    • Parliament ready to reject any proposals that would not meet its standards

    It is high time to start negotiations on the MFF with the Council without delay, said the EP’s negotiating team for the long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform.

    The six members of the MFF/OR negotiating team commented on the Commission’s proposals for a revised Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and recovery plan presented on Wednesday in an extraordinary plenary session:

    “We will carefully assess the package of proposals presented by the European Commission today. We positively acknowledge the reinforcement of the current MFF in 2020 and the significant borrowing which are much needed.

    Today’s Commission proposals are an important step. We therefore regret that the Commission has reduced its original MFF proposal, thus moving further away from Parliament and closer to the European Council President’s February 2020 proposal. Once the recovery phase is behind us, this could leave us with a weakened budget that prevents the EU from investing in its common future - such as climate and digital transformation -, leaving it more vulnerable to further crises.

    Parliament shares the view that the recovery plan will be channelled through the MFF and must be embedded in a reformed system of own resources. But it would be self-defeating to trade the long-term against the short-term: the recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the core MFF and its wider objectives, which the COVID-19 outbreak has made more relevant than ever. Furthermore, any new budgetary tool must ensure Parliament’s participation and the community method to boost democratic oversight, transparency and accountability.

    We express, however, our concerns about future debt and the way it will be repaid in the future.

    Parliament agrees with the general approach that the long-term repayment of the borrowing should be re-financed by new, genuine own resources in order to use European, rather than ever more national means to finance our needs and thus to avoid a new dividing line between net contributors and net recipients. We regret, however, that the Commission is only putting forward a menu of possible revenue sources rather than submitting concrete legislative initiatives for a basket of new own resources as requested by Parliament, which would also have immediate economic and policy benefits as of 2021. Parliament recalls its consent is conditional on the introduction of a basket of new own resources without further delay.

    Parliament must give its consent to any new MFF, and stands ready to do so if the final agreement will include its main priorities and will genuinely provide for Parliament’s participation. We call on the Council to work constructively with Parliament on improving the Commission’s proposals.

    Failing an agreement before the end of the year, 2020 ceilings would be automatically extended. That is why Parliament has formally requested that the Commission present an MFF contingency plan in order to eliminate any risk of discontinuity or disorderly extension. A contingency plan based on 2020 ceilings could indeed provide a better basis for the European Union’s recovery than a late and inadequate MFF.

    Since November 2018, we have repeatedly expressed our readiness to engage with the Council on the MFF and the Own Resources, to no avail. Given how urgent this is, it is high time to start these negotiations without further delay.”



    The EP's negotiating team for the next long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform


    Johan Van Overtveldt (ECR, BE), Chair of the Committee on Budgets

    Jan Olbrycht (EPP, PL), MFF co-rapporteur

    Margarida Marques (S&D, PT), MFF co-rapporteur

    José Manuel Fernandes (EPP, PT), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Valérie Hayer (RENEW, FR), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Rasmus Andresen (Greens/EFA, DE)

    Follow them on Twitter: https://twitter.com/EP_Budgets/lists/mff-negotiation-team

     
     
     

    Deel deze pagina: 

    Deel deze pagina: 
    Deel deze pagina: 
  • Facebook Facebook 
  • Twitter Twitter 
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn 
  • Whatsapp Whatsapp 
    • The €750 billion borrowing plan is an important proposal for an efficient recovery
    • Recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the MFF, MEPs said in reaction to the Commission’s long-term budget and recovery plan proposals
    • Danger of weakened EU budget after recovery phase, preventing EU from investing in common future
    • Parliament ready to reject any proposals that would not meet its standards

    It is high time to start negotiations on the MFF with the Council without delay, said the EP’s negotiating team for the long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform.

    The six members of the MFF/OR negotiating team commented on the Commission’s proposals for a revised Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and recovery plan presented on Wednesday in an extraordinary plenary session:

    “We will carefully assess the package of proposals presented by the European Commission today. We positively acknowledge the reinforcement of the current MFF in 2020 and the significant borrowing which are much needed.

    Today’s Commission proposals are an important step. We therefore regret that the Commission has reduced its original MFF proposal, thus moving further away from Parliament and closer to the European Council President’s February 2020 proposal. Once the recovery phase is behind us, this could leave us with a weakened budget that prevents the EU from investing in its common future - such as climate and digital transformation -, leaving it more vulnerable to further crises.

    Parliament shares the view that the recovery plan will be channelled through the MFF and must be embedded in a reformed system of own resources. But it would be self-defeating to trade the long-term against the short-term: the recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the core MFF and its wider objectives, which the COVID-19 outbreak has made more relevant than ever. Furthermore, any new budgetary tool must ensure Parliament’s participation and the community method to boost democratic oversight, transparency and accountability.

    We express, however, our concerns about future debt and the way it will be repaid in the future.

    Parliament agrees with the general approach that the long-term repayment of the borrowing should be re-financed by new, genuine own resources in order to use European, rather than ever more national means to finance our needs and thus to avoid a new dividing line between net contributors and net recipients. We regret, however, that the Commission is only putting forward a menu of possible revenue sources rather than submitting concrete legislative initiatives for a basket of new own resources as requested by Parliament, which would also have immediate economic and policy benefits as of 2021. Parliament recalls its consent is conditional on the introduction of a basket of new own resources without further delay.

    Parliament must give its consent to any new MFF, and stands ready to do so if the final agreement will include its main priorities and will genuinely provide for Parliament’s participation. We call on the Council to work constructively with Parliament on improving the Commission’s proposals.

    Failing an agreement before the end of the year, 2020 ceilings would be automatically extended. That is why Parliament has formally requested that the Commission present an MFF contingency plan in order to eliminate any risk of discontinuity or disorderly extension. A contingency plan based on 2020 ceilings could indeed provide a better basis for the European Union’s recovery than a late and inadequate MFF.

    Since November 2018, we have repeatedly expressed our readiness to engage with the Council on the MFF and the Own Resources, to no avail. Given how urgent this is, it is high time to start these negotiations without further delay.”



    The EP's negotiating team for the next long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform


    Johan Van Overtveldt (ECR, BE), Chair of the Committee on Budgets

    Jan Olbrycht (EPP, PL), MFF co-rapporteur

    Margarida Marques (S&D, PT), MFF co-rapporteur

    José Manuel Fernandes (EPP, PT), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Valérie Hayer (RENEW, FR), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Rasmus Andresen (Greens/EFA, DE)

    Follow them on Twitter: https://twitter.com/EP_Budgets/lists/mff-negotiation-team

    • The €750 billion borrowing plan is an important proposal for an efficient recovery
    • Recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the MFF, MEPs said in reaction to the Commission’s long-term budget and recovery plan proposals
    • Danger of weakened EU budget after recovery phase, preventing EU from investing in common future
    • Parliament ready to reject any proposals that would not meet its standards

    It is high time to start negotiations on the MFF with the Council without delay, said the EP’s negotiating team for the long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform.

    The six members of the MFF/OR negotiating team commented on the Commission’s proposals for a revised Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and recovery plan presented on Wednesday in an extraordinary plenary session:

    “We will carefully assess the package of proposals presented by the European Commission today. We positively acknowledge the reinforcement of the current MFF in 2020 and the significant borrowing which are much needed.

    Today’s Commission proposals are an important step. We therefore regret that the Commission has reduced its original MFF proposal, thus moving further away from Parliament and closer to the European Council President’s February 2020 proposal. Once the recovery phase is behind us, this could leave us with a weakened budget that prevents the EU from investing in its common future - such as climate and digital transformation -, leaving it more vulnerable to further crises.

    Parliament shares the view that the recovery plan will be channelled through the MFF and must be embedded in a reformed system of own resources. But it would be self-defeating to trade the long-term against the short-term: the recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the core MFF and its wider objectives, which the COVID-19 outbreak has made more relevant than ever. Furthermore, any new budgetary tool must ensure Parliament’s participation and the community method to boost democratic oversight, transparency and accountability.

    We express, however, our concerns about future debt and the way it will be repaid in the future.

    Parliament agrees with the general approach that the long-term repayment of the borrowing should be re-financed by new, genuine own resources in order to use European, rather than ever more national means to finance our needs and thus to avoid a new dividing line between net contributors and net recipients. We regret, however, that the Commission is only putting forward a menu of possible revenue sources rather than submitting concrete legislative initiatives for a basket of new own resources as requested by Parliament, which would also have immediate economic and policy benefits as of 2021. Parliament recalls its consent is conditional on the introduction of a basket of new own resources without further delay.

    Parliament must give its consent to any new MFF, and stands ready to do so if the final agreement will include its main priorities and will genuinely provide for Parliament’s participation. We call on the Council to work constructively with Parliament on improving the Commission’s proposals.

    Failing an agreement before the end of the year, 2020 ceilings would be automatically extended. That is why Parliament has formally requested that the Commission present an MFF contingency plan in order to eliminate any risk of discontinuity or disorderly extension. A contingency plan based on 2020 ceilings could indeed provide a better basis for the European Union’s recovery than a late and inadequate MFF.

    Since November 2018, we have repeatedly expressed our readiness to engage with the Council on the MFF and the Own Resources, to no avail. Given how urgent this is, it is high time to start these negotiations without further delay.”



    The EP's negotiating team for the next long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform


    Johan Van Overtveldt (ECR, BE), Chair of the Committee on Budgets

    Jan Olbrycht (EPP, PL), MFF co-rapporteur

    Margarida Marques (S&D, PT), MFF co-rapporteur

    José Manuel Fernandes (EPP, PT), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Valérie Hayer (RENEW, FR), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Rasmus Andresen (Greens/EFA, DE)

    Follow them on Twitter: https://twitter.com/EP_Budgets/lists/mff-negotiation-team

    • The €750 billion borrowing plan is an important proposal for an efficient recovery
    • Recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the MFF, MEPs said in reaction to the Commission’s long-term budget and recovery plan proposals
    • Danger of weakened EU budget after recovery phase, preventing EU from investing in common future
    • Parliament ready to reject any proposals that would not meet its standards

    It is high time to start negotiations on the MFF with the Council without delay, said the EP’s negotiating team for the long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform.

    The six members of the MFF/OR negotiating team commented on the Commission’s proposals for a revised Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and recovery plan presented on Wednesday in an extraordinary plenary session:

    “We will carefully assess the package of proposals presented by the European Commission today. We positively acknowledge the reinforcement of the current MFF in 2020 and the significant borrowing which are much needed.

    Today’s Commission proposals are an important step. We therefore regret that the Commission has reduced its original MFF proposal, thus moving further away from Parliament and closer to the European Council President’s February 2020 proposal. Once the recovery phase is behind us, this could leave us with a weakened budget that prevents the EU from investing in its common future - such as climate and digital transformation -, leaving it more vulnerable to further crises.

    Parliament shares the view that the recovery plan will be channelled through the MFF and must be embedded in a reformed system of own resources. But it would be self-defeating to trade the long-term against the short-term: the recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the core MFF and its wider objectives, which the COVID-19 outbreak has made more relevant than ever. Furthermore, any new budgetary tool must ensure Parliament’s participation and the community method to boost democratic oversight, transparency and accountability.

    We express, however, our concerns about future debt and the way it will be repaid in the future.

    Parliament agrees with the general approach that the long-term repayment of the borrowing should be re-financed by new, genuine own resources in order to use European, rather than ever more national means to finance our needs and thus to avoid a new dividing line between net contributors and net recipients. We regret, however, that the Commission is only putting forward a menu of possible revenue sources rather than submitting concrete legislative initiatives for a basket of new own resources as requested by Parliament, which would also have immediate economic and policy benefits as of 2021. Parliament recalls its consent is conditional on the introduction of a basket of new own resources without further delay.

    Parliament must give its consent to any new MFF, and stands ready to do so if the final agreement will include its main priorities and will genuinely provide for Parliament’s participation. We call on the Council to work constructively with Parliament on improving the Commission’s proposals.

    Failing an agreement before the end of the year, 2020 ceilings would be automatically extended. That is why Parliament has formally requested that the Commission present an MFF contingency plan in order to eliminate any risk of discontinuity or disorderly extension. A contingency plan based on 2020 ceilings could indeed provide a better basis for the European Union’s recovery than a late and inadequate MFF.

    Since November 2018, we have repeatedly expressed our readiness to engage with the Council on the MFF and the Own Resources, to no avail. Given how urgent this is, it is high time to start these negotiations without further delay.”



    The EP's negotiating team for the next long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform


    Johan Van Overtveldt (ECR, BE), Chair of the Committee on Budgets

    Jan Olbrycht (EPP, PL), MFF co-rapporteur

    Margarida Marques (S&D, PT), MFF co-rapporteur

    José Manuel Fernandes (EPP, PT), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Valérie Hayer (RENEW, FR), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Rasmus Andresen (Greens/EFA, DE)

    Follow them on Twitter: https://twitter.com/EP_Budgets/lists/mff-negotiation-team

    • The €750 billion borrowing plan is an important proposal for an efficient recovery
    • Recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the MFF, MEPs said in reaction to the Commission’s long-term budget and recovery plan proposals
    • Danger of weakened EU budget after recovery phase, preventing EU from investing in common future
    • Parliament ready to reject any proposals that would not meet its standards
    • The €750 billion borrowing plan is an important proposal for an efficient recovery
    • Recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the MFF, MEPs said in reaction to the Commission’s long-term budget and recovery plan proposals
    • Danger of weakened EU budget after recovery phase, preventing EU from investing in common future
    • Parliament ready to reject any proposals that would not meet its standards
    • The €750 billion borrowing plan is an important proposal for an efficient recovery
    • Recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the MFF, MEPs said in reaction to the Commission’s long-term budget and recovery plan proposals
    • Danger of weakened EU budget after recovery phase, preventing EU from investing in common future
    • Parliament ready to reject any proposals that would not meet its standards
    • The €750 billion borrowing plan is an important proposal for an efficient recovery
    • Recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the MFF, MEPs said in reaction to the Commission’s long-term budget and recovery plan proposals
    • Danger of weakened EU budget after recovery phase, preventing EU from investing in common future
    • Parliament ready to reject any proposals that would not meet its standards
  • The €750 billion borrowing plan is an important proposal for an efficient recovery
  • Recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the MFF, MEPs said in reaction to the Commission’s long-term budget and recovery plan proposals
  • Danger of weakened EU budget after recovery phase, preventing EU from investing in common future
  • Parliament ready to reject any proposals that would not meet its standards
  • It is high time to start negotiations on the MFF with the Council without delay, said the EP’s negotiating team for the long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform.

    It is high time to start negotiations on the MFF with the Council without delay, said the EP’s negotiating team for the long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform.

    It is high time to start negotiations on the MFF with the Council without delay, said the EP’s negotiating team for the long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform.

    It is high time to start negotiations on the MFF with the Council without delay, said the EP’s negotiating team for the long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform.

    The six members of the MFF/OR negotiating team commented on the Commission’s proposals for a revised Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and recovery plan presented on Wednesday in an extraordinary plenary session:

    “We will carefully assess the package of proposals presented by the European Commission today. We positively acknowledge the reinforcement of the current MFF in 2020 and the significant borrowing which are much needed.

    Today’s Commission proposals are an important step. We therefore regret that the Commission has reduced its original MFF proposal, thus moving further away from Parliament and closer to the European Council President’s February 2020 proposal. Once the recovery phase is behind us, this could leave us with a weakened budget that prevents the EU from investing in its common future - such as climate and digital transformation -, leaving it more vulnerable to further crises.

    Parliament shares the view that the recovery plan will be channelled through the MFF and must be embedded in a reformed system of own resources. But it would be self-defeating to trade the long-term against the short-term: the recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the core MFF and its wider objectives, which the COVID-19 outbreak has made more relevant than ever. Furthermore, any new budgetary tool must ensure Parliament’s participation and the community method to boost democratic oversight, transparency and accountability.

    We express, however, our concerns about future debt and the way it will be repaid in the future.

    Parliament agrees with the general approach that the long-term repayment of the borrowing should be re-financed by new, genuine own resources in order to use European, rather than ever more national means to finance our needs and thus to avoid a new dividing line between net contributors and net recipients. We regret, however, that the Commission is only putting forward a menu of possible revenue sources rather than submitting concrete legislative initiatives for a basket of new own resources as requested by Parliament, which would also have immediate economic and policy benefits as of 2021. Parliament recalls its consent is conditional on the introduction of a basket of new own resources without further delay.

    Parliament must give its consent to any new MFF, and stands ready to do so if the final agreement will include its main priorities and will genuinely provide for Parliament’s participation. We call on the Council to work constructively with Parliament on improving the Commission’s proposals.

    Failing an agreement before the end of the year, 2020 ceilings would be automatically extended. That is why Parliament has formally requested that the Commission present an MFF contingency plan in order to eliminate any risk of discontinuity or disorderly extension. A contingency plan based on 2020 ceilings could indeed provide a better basis for the European Union’s recovery than a late and inadequate MFF.

    Since November 2018, we have repeatedly expressed our readiness to engage with the Council on the MFF and the Own Resources, to no avail. Given how urgent this is, it is high time to start these negotiations without further delay.”



    The EP's negotiating team for the next long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform


    Johan Van Overtveldt (ECR, BE), Chair of the Committee on Budgets

    Jan Olbrycht (EPP, PL), MFF co-rapporteur

    Margarida Marques (S&D, PT), MFF co-rapporteur

    José Manuel Fernandes (EPP, PT), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Valérie Hayer (RENEW, FR), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Rasmus Andresen (Greens/EFA, DE)

    Follow them on Twitter: https://twitter.com/EP_Budgets/lists/mff-negotiation-team

    The six members of the MFF/OR negotiating team commented on the Commission’s proposals for a revised Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and recovery plan presented on Wednesday in an extraordinary plenary session:

    “We will carefully assess the package of proposals presented by the European Commission today. We positively acknowledge the reinforcement of the current MFF in 2020 and the significant borrowing which are much needed.

    Today’s Commission proposals are an important step. We therefore regret that the Commission has reduced its original MFF proposal, thus moving further away from Parliament and closer to the European Council President’s February 2020 proposal. Once the recovery phase is behind us, this could leave us with a weakened budget that prevents the EU from investing in its common future - such as climate and digital transformation -, leaving it more vulnerable to further crises.

    Parliament shares the view that the recovery plan will be channelled through the MFF and must be embedded in a reformed system of own resources. But it would be self-defeating to trade the long-term against the short-term: the recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the core MFF and its wider objectives, which the COVID-19 outbreak has made more relevant than ever. Furthermore, any new budgetary tool must ensure Parliament’s participation and the community method to boost democratic oversight, transparency and accountability.

    We express, however, our concerns about future debt and the way it will be repaid in the future.

    Parliament agrees with the general approach that the long-term repayment of the borrowing should be re-financed by new, genuine own resources in order to use European, rather than ever more national means to finance our needs and thus to avoid a new dividing line between net contributors and net recipients. We regret, however, that the Commission is only putting forward a menu of possible revenue sources rather than submitting concrete legislative initiatives for a basket of new own resources as requested by Parliament, which would also have immediate economic and policy benefits as of 2021. Parliament recalls its consent is conditional on the introduction of a basket of new own resources without further delay.

    Parliament must give its consent to any new MFF, and stands ready to do so if the final agreement will include its main priorities and will genuinely provide for Parliament’s participation. We call on the Council to work constructively with Parliament on improving the Commission’s proposals.

    Failing an agreement before the end of the year, 2020 ceilings would be automatically extended. That is why Parliament has formally requested that the Commission present an MFF contingency plan in order to eliminate any risk of discontinuity or disorderly extension. A contingency plan based on 2020 ceilings could indeed provide a better basis for the European Union’s recovery than a late and inadequate MFF.

    Since November 2018, we have repeatedly expressed our readiness to engage with the Council on the MFF and the Own Resources, to no avail. Given how urgent this is, it is high time to start these negotiations without further delay.”



    The EP's negotiating team for the next long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform


    Johan Van Overtveldt (ECR, BE), Chair of the Committee on Budgets

    Jan Olbrycht (EPP, PL), MFF co-rapporteur

    Margarida Marques (S&D, PT), MFF co-rapporteur

    José Manuel Fernandes (EPP, PT), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Valérie Hayer (RENEW, FR), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Rasmus Andresen (Greens/EFA, DE)

    Follow them on Twitter: https://twitter.com/EP_Budgets/lists/mff-negotiation-team

    The six members of the MFF/OR negotiating team commented on the Commission’s proposals for a revised Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and recovery plan presented on Wednesday in an extraordinary plenary session:

    “We will carefully assess the package of proposals presented by the European Commission today. We positively acknowledge the reinforcement of the current MFF in 2020 and the significant borrowing which are much needed.

    Today’s Commission proposals are an important step. We therefore regret that the Commission has reduced its original MFF proposal, thus moving further away from Parliament and closer to the European Council President’s February 2020 proposal. Once the recovery phase is behind us, this could leave us with a weakened budget that prevents the EU from investing in its common future - such as climate and digital transformation -, leaving it more vulnerable to further crises.

    Parliament shares the view that the recovery plan will be channelled through the MFF and must be embedded in a reformed system of own resources. But it would be self-defeating to trade the long-term against the short-term: the recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the core MFF and its wider objectives, which the COVID-19 outbreak has made more relevant than ever. Furthermore, any new budgetary tool must ensure Parliament’s participation and the community method to boost democratic oversight, transparency and accountability.

    We express, however, our concerns about future debt and the way it will be repaid in the future.

    Parliament agrees with the general approach that the long-term repayment of the borrowing should be re-financed by new, genuine own resources in order to use European, rather than ever more national means to finance our needs and thus to avoid a new dividing line between net contributors and net recipients. We regret, however, that the Commission is only putting forward a menu of possible revenue sources rather than submitting concrete legislative initiatives for a basket of new own resources as requested by Parliament, which would also have immediate economic and policy benefits as of 2021. Parliament recalls its consent is conditional on the introduction of a basket of new own resources without further delay.

    Parliament must give its consent to any new MFF, and stands ready to do so if the final agreement will include its main priorities and will genuinely provide for Parliament’s participation. We call on the Council to work constructively with Parliament on improving the Commission’s proposals.

    Failing an agreement before the end of the year, 2020 ceilings would be automatically extended. That is why Parliament has formally requested that the Commission present an MFF contingency plan in order to eliminate any risk of discontinuity or disorderly extension. A contingency plan based on 2020 ceilings could indeed provide a better basis for the European Union’s recovery than a late and inadequate MFF.

    Since November 2018, we have repeatedly expressed our readiness to engage with the Council on the MFF and the Own Resources, to no avail. Given how urgent this is, it is high time to start these negotiations without further delay.”



    The EP's negotiating team for the next long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform


    Johan Van Overtveldt (ECR, BE), Chair of the Committee on Budgets

    Jan Olbrycht (EPP, PL), MFF co-rapporteur

    Margarida Marques (S&D, PT), MFF co-rapporteur

    José Manuel Fernandes (EPP, PT), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Valérie Hayer (RENEW, FR), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Rasmus Andresen (Greens/EFA, DE)

    Follow them on Twitter: https://twitter.com/EP_Budgets/lists/mff-negotiation-team

    The six members of the MFF/OR negotiating team commented on the Commission’s proposals for a revised Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and recovery plan presented on Wednesday in an extraordinary plenary session:

    “We will carefully assess the package of proposals presented by the European Commission today. We positively acknowledge the reinforcement of the current MFF in 2020 and the significant borrowing which are much needed.

    Today’s Commission proposals are an important step. We therefore regret that the Commission has reduced its original MFF proposal, thus moving further away from Parliament and closer to the European Council President’s February 2020 proposal. Once the recovery phase is behind us, this could leave us with a weakened budget that prevents the EU from investing in its common future - such as climate and digital transformation -, leaving it more vulnerable to further crises.

    Parliament shares the view that the recovery plan will be channelled through the MFF and must be embedded in a reformed system of own resources. But it would be self-defeating to trade the long-term against the short-term: the recovery strategy should not be financed at the expense of the core MFF and its wider objectives, which the COVID-19 outbreak has made more relevant than ever. Furthermore, any new budgetary tool must ensure Parliament’s participation and the community method to boost democratic oversight, transparency and accountability.

    We express, however, our concerns about future debt and the way it will be repaid in the future.

    Parliament agrees with the general approach that the long-term repayment of the borrowing should be re-financed by new, genuine own resources in order to use European, rather than ever more national means to finance our needs and thus to avoid a new dividing line between net contributors and net recipients. We regret, however, that the Commission is only putting forward a menu of possible revenue sources rather than submitting concrete legislative initiatives for a basket of new own resources as requested by Parliament, which would also have immediate economic and policy benefits as of 2021. Parliament recalls its consent is conditional on the introduction of a basket of new own resources without further delay.

    Parliament must give its consent to any new MFF, and stands ready to do so if the final agreement will include its main priorities and will genuinely provide for Parliament’s participation. We call on the Council to work constructively with Parliament on improving the Commission’s proposals.

    Failing an agreement before the end of the year, 2020 ceilings would be automatically extended. That is why Parliament has formally requested that the Commission present an MFF contingency plan in order to eliminate any risk of discontinuity or disorderly extension. A contingency plan based on 2020 ceilings could indeed provide a better basis for the European Union’s recovery than a late and inadequate MFF.

    Since November 2018, we have repeatedly expressed our readiness to engage with the Council on the MFF and the Own Resources, to no avail. Given how urgent this is, it is high time to start these negotiations without further delay.”





    The EP's negotiating team for the next long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform

    The EP's negotiating team for the next long-term EU budget and Own Resources reform

    Johan Van Overtveldt (ECR, BE), Chair of the Committee on Budgets

    Johan Van Overtveldt

    Jan Olbrycht (EPP, PL), MFF co-rapporteur

    Jan Olbrycht

    Margarida Marques (S&D, PT), MFF co-rapporteur

    Margarida Marques

    José Manuel Fernandes (EPP, PT), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    José Manuel Fernandes

    Valérie Hayer (RENEW, FR), Own Resources co-rapporteur

    Valérie Hayer

    Rasmus Andresen (Greens/EFA, DE)

    Rasmus Andresen

    Follow them on Twitter: https://twitter.com/EP_Budgets/lists/mff-negotiation-team

    Follow them on Twitterhttps://twitter.com/EP_Budgets/lists/mff-negotiation-team

    Contact: 

    Contact: 
    Contact: 
  • Armin WISDORFF 

    Armin WISDORFF Armin WISDORFF 
    Press Officer 
    Press Officer Press Officer 
    Contactgegevens: 
    Contactgegevens: 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+32) 2 28 40924 (BXL) 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+32) 2 28 40924 (BXL) Telefoonnummer: (+32) 2 28 40924 (BXL)Telefoonnummer: (BXL) 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+33) 3 881 73780 (STR) 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+33) 3 881 73780 (STR) Telefoonnummer: (+33) 3 881 73780 (STR)Telefoonnummer: (STR) 
  • Mobiel telefoonnummer: (+32) 498 98 13 45 
  • Mobiel telefoonnummer: (+32) 498 98 13 45 Mobiel telefoonnummer: (+32) 498 98 13 45Mobiel telefoonnummer:  
  • E-mail: armin.wisdorff@europarl.europa.eu 
  • E-mail: armin.wisdorff@europarl.europa.eu E-mail: armin.wisdorff@europarl.europa.euE-mail:  
  • E-mail: budg-press@europarl.europa.eu 
  • E-mail: budg-press@europarl.europa.eu E-mail: budg-press@europarl.europa.euE-mail:  
  • Twitteraccount: @EP_Budgets 
  • Twitteraccount: @EP_Budgets Twitteraccount: @EP_BudgetsTwitteraccount:  
     
     

    Further information 

    Further information 
    Further information 
  • Committee on Budgets  Committee on Budgets 
  • “Parliament: EU27 need €2 trillion recovery package to tackle COVID-19 fallout” (EP press release from 15 May)  “Parliament: EU27 need €2 trillion recovery package to tackle COVID-19 fallout” (EP press release from 15 May) 
  • EP resolution of 15 May 2020 on the new multiannual financial framework, own resources and the recovery plan  EP resolution of 15 May 2020 on the new multiannual financial framework, own resources and the recovery plan 
  • Q&A on the EU's long-term budget (Multiannual Financial Framework, MFF)  Q&A on the EU's long-term budget (Multiannual Financial Framework, MFF) 
  • EP research background: “EU budgetary and financial response to the coronavirus crisis”  EP research background: “EU budgetary and financial response to the coronavirus crisis” 
  • More EP research background briefings on the MFF  More EP research background briefings on the MFF 
     
     
     
     
     

    Productinformatie 

    REF.:  20200526IPR79824 

    Productinformatie 

    Productinformatie 
    Productinformatie 
    Productinformatie 
    REF.:  20200526IPR79824 
    REF.:  20200526IPR79824 
    REF.: REF.:REF.: 20200526IPR79824 20200526IPR79824 

    Deel deze pagina: 

    Deel deze pagina: 
    Deel deze pagina: 
  • Facebook Facebook 
  • Twitter Twitter 
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn 
  • Whatsapp Whatsapp Aanmelden voor e-mailupdatesAanmelden voor e-mailupdatesPdf-versie Pdf-versie 

    Footer 

    Footer Nieuws  Bekijk het menu: nieuws  Bekijk het menu: nieuws 
    Het Parlement in uw land 
  • Brussels  
  • Brussels   Brussels 
  • Den Haag  
  • Den Haag   Den Haag Tools 
  • Wetgevingsobservatorium  
  • Wetgevingsobservatorium   Wetgevingsobservatorium 
  • Multimedia Centre  
  • Multimedia Centre   Multimedia Centre 
  • EbS  
  • EbS   EbS 
    De Voorzitter van het Europees Parlement 
  • Webpagina van de Voorzitter van het Parlement  
  • Webpagina van de Voorzitter van het Parlement   Webpagina van de Voorzitter van het Parlement  Menu verbergen: Nieuws   Menu verbergen: Nieuws Europees Parlement  Menu bekijken: Europees Parlement   Menu bekijken: Europees Parlement 
  • Nieuws 
  • Nieuws  Nieuws 
  • Leden 
  • Leden  Leden 
  • Over het Parlement 
  • Over het Parlement  Over het Parlement 
  • Plenaire vergadering 
  • Plenaire vergadering  Plenaire vergadering 
  • Commissies 
  • Commissies  Commissies 
  • Delegaties 
  • Delegaties  Delegaties Menu verbergen: Europees Parlement Menu verbergen: Europees Parlement  

    Het Parlement in de sociale media  

    Het Parlement in de sociale media 
  • Facebook  
  • Facebook   Facebook 
  • Twitter  
  • Twitter   Twitter 
  • Facebook  
  • Facebook   Facebook 
  • LinkedIn  
  • LinkedIn   LinkedIn 
  • YouTube  
  • YouTube   YouTube 
  • Instagram  
  • Instagram   Instagram 
  • Pinterest  
  • Pinterest   Pinterest 
  • Snapchat  
  • Snapchat   Snapchat 
  • Reddit  
  • Reddit   Reddit Informatieve links 
  • Contact 
  • Contact Contact 
  • RSS 
  • RSS RSS 
  • Sitemap 
  • Sitemap Sitemap 
  • Juridische mededeling - Privacybeleid 
  • Juridische mededeling - Privacybeleid Juridische mededeling - Privacybeleid 
  • Toegankelijkheid 
  • Toegankelijkheid Toegankelijkheid