Guidelines for military and non-military use of Artificial Intelligence | Nieuws | Europees Parlement

Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
 

Guidelines for military and non-military use of Artificial Intelligence 

 
  • AI can replace neither human decision-making nor human contact 
  • EU strategy prohibiting lethal autonomous weapon systems needed 
  • Call for a ban on “highly intrusive social scoring applications” by public authorities; concerns over “deepfakes” 

Artificial Intelligence must be subject to human control, allowing humans to correct or disable it in case of unforeseen behaviour, say MEPs.

 

The report, adopted on Wednesday with 364 votes in favour, 274 against, 52 abstentions, calls for an EU legal framework on AI with definitions and ethical principles, including its military use. It also calls on the EU and its member states to ensure AI and related technologies are human-centred (i.e. intended for the service of humanity and the common good).

Military use and human oversight

MEPs stress that human dignity and human rights must be respected in all EU defence-related activities. AI-enabled systems must allow humans to exert meaningful control, so they can assume responsibility and accountability for their use.

The use of lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS) raises fundamental ethical and legal questions on human control, say MEPs, reiterating their call for an EU strategy to prohibit them as well as a ban on so-called “killer robots”. The decision to select a target and take lethal action using an autonomous weapon system must always be made by a human exercising meaningful control and judgement, in line with the principles of proportionality and necessity.

The text calls on the EU to take a leading role in creating and promoting a global framework governing the military use of AI, alongside the UN and the international community.

AI in the public sector

The increased use of AI systems in public services, especially healthcare and justice, should not replace human contact or lead to discrimination, MEPs assert. People should always be informed if they are subject to a decision based on AI and be given the option to appeal it.

When AI is used in matters of public health, (e.g. robot-assisted surgery, smart prostheses, predictive medicine), patients’ personal data must be protected and the principle of equal treatment upheld. While the use of AI technologies in the justice sector can help speed up proceedings and take more rational decisions, final court decisions must be taken by humans, be strictly verified by a person and be subject to due process.

Mass surveillance and deepfakes

MEPs also warn of threats to fundamental human rights and state sovereignty arising from the use of AI technologies in mass civil and military surveillance. They call for public authorities to be banned from using “highly intrusive social scoring applications” (for monitoring and rating citizens). The report also raises concerns over “deepfake technologies” that have the potential to “destabilise countries, spread disinformation and influence elections”. Creators should be obliged to label such material as “not original” and more research should be done into technology to counter this phenomenon.


Quote

Rapporteur Gilles Lebreton (ID, FR) said: “Faced with the multiple challenges posed by the development of AI, we need legal responses. To prepare the Commission’s legislative proposal on this subject, this report aims to put in place a framework which essentially recalls that, in any area, especially in the military field and in those managed by the state such as justice and health, AI must always remain a tool used only to assist decision-making or help when taking action. It must never replace or relieve humans of their responsibility”.

 
Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
  • Direct naar de inhoud van de pagina (druk op "Enter") 
  • Direct naar de inhoud van de pagina (druk op "Enter") Direct naar de inhoud van de pagina (druk op "Enter") 
  • Rechtstreeks naar talenmenu (druk op "Enter") 
  • Rechtstreeks naar talenmenu (druk op "Enter") Rechtstreeks naar talenmenu (druk op "Enter") 
  • Rechtstreeks naar zoekmenu (druk op "Enter") 
  • Rechtstreeks naar zoekmenu (druk op "Enter") Rechtstreeks naar zoekmenu (druk op "Enter")  Europees Parlement  Europees Parlement  Nieuws  Nieuws  
    Navigatiebalk (Menu)  
    Navigatiebalk (Menu)  
    Navigatiebalk (Menu)   Navigatiebalk (Menu) Navigatiebalk ()  Navigatiebalk (Menu)   Navigatiebalk (Menu) Navigatiebalk () 
    1. Nieuws  Nieuws 
    2. Pers  Pers 
    3. Agenda  Agenda 
  • Nieuws  Nieuws 
  • Nieuws  Nieuws 
    Nieuws Nieuws Nieuws Nieuws 
    Startpagina  Startpagina  Categorie:Europese zaken  Categorie:Europese zakenCategorie:  Categorie:Wereld  Categorie:WereldCategorie:  Categorie:Economie  Categorie:EconomieCategorie:  Categorie:Maatschappij  Categorie:MaatschappijCategorie:  Categorie:Veiligheid  Categorie:VeiligheidCategorie:  Menu sluiten  Menu sluiten 
  • Pers  Pers 
  • Pers  Pers 
    Pers Pers  Pers  Pers 
    Startpagina   Startpagina Accreditatie Accreditatie Contact Contact Close(Pers) Close(Pers)(Pers) 
  • Agenda  Agenda 
  • Agenda  Agenda 
    Agenda Agenda  Agenda  Agenda 
    Hoogtepunten Hoogtepunten Wekelijkse agenda Wekelijkse agenda Briefing Briefing Menu sluiten Menu sluiten  Veelgestelde vragen  Veelgestelde vragen  #EuropeanenTegenCovid19  #EuropeanenTegenCovid19  Sluit de navigatiebalk(Menu)  Sluit de navigatiebalk(Menu)Sluit de navigatiebalk()   
    Naar het zoekveld   Naar het zoekveld Search 
    Zoekopdracht starten  Sluit het zoekveld   Sluit het zoekveld 
    Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
    Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
    Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
    Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
    Taal kiezen 
    Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
    Huidige taal: NL - Nederlands  
    Huidige taal:NL - Nederlands Selecteer 
    Andere websites 
    Andere websites bekijken  Andere websites bekijken 
    Andere websites 
    Andere websites  Andere websites bekijken  Andere websites bekijken  Andere websites bekijken  Andere websites bekijken 
    1. Nieuws 
    2. Leden 
    3. Over het Parlement 
    4. Plenaire vergadering 
    5. Commissies 
    6. Delegaties 
    7. Andere websitesMeer 
      BekijkenAndere websitesMeer  Andere websitesMeer 
  • Nieuws 
  • Nieuws  Nieuws 
  • Leden 
  • Leden  Leden 
  • Over het Parlement 
  • Over het Parlement  Over het Parlement 
  • Plenaire vergadering 
  • Plenaire vergadering  Plenaire vergadering 
  • Commissies 
  • Commissies  Commissies 
  • Delegaties 
  • Delegaties  Delegaties 
  • Andere websitesMeer 
    BekijkenAndere websitesMeer  Andere websitesMeer 
  • Andere websitesMeer 
    BekijkenAndere websitesMeer  Andere websitesMeer 
    Andere websitesMeer 
    Andere websitesMeerAndere websitesMeer BekijkenAndere websitesMeer BekijkenAndere websitesMeerBekijkenAndere websitesMeer Andere websitesMeer Andere websitesMeerAndere websitesMeer 
    1. Multimedia Centre 
    2. Webpagina van de Voorzitter 
    3. Secretariaat-generaal 
    4. Think tank 
    5. EP Newshub 
    6. Tot uw dienst 
    7. Bezoeken 
    8. Legislative train 
    9. Contracten en subsidies 
    10. Registreren 
  • Multimedia Centre 
  • Multimedia Centre Multimedia Centre 
  • Webpagina van de Voorzitter 
  • Webpagina van de Voorzitter Webpagina van de Voorzitter 
  • Secretariaat-generaal 
  • Secretariaat-generaal Secretariaat-generaal 
  • Think tank 
  • Think tank Think tank 
  • EP Newshub 
  • EP Newshub EP Newshub 
  • Tot uw dienst 
  • Tot uw dienst Tot uw dienst 
  • Bezoeken 
  • Bezoeken Bezoeken 
  • Legislative train 
  • Legislative train Legislative train 
  • Contracten en subsidies 
  • Contracten en subsidies Contracten en subsidies 
  • Registreren 
  • Registreren Registreren Andere websites verbergenAndere websitesMeer Andere websites verbergenAndere websitesMeerAndere websites verbergenAndere websitesMeer  Andere websites verbergen  Andere websites verbergen 
    Pers   > Huidige pagina: Guidelines for military and non-military use of Artificial Intelligence  
    Pers   > Pers  Pers > Huidige pagina: Guidelines for military and non-military use of Artificial Intelligence   Huidige pagina: Guidelines for military and non-military use of Artificial Intelligence   Huidige pagina:Guidelines for military and non-military use of Artificial Intelligence  Pers  Pers >
     

    Guidelines for military and non-military use of Artificial Intelligence 

     
    • AI can replace neither human decision-making nor human contact 
    • EU strategy prohibiting lethal autonomous weapon systems needed 
    • Call for a ban on “highly intrusive social scoring applications” by public authorities; concerns over “deepfakes” 

    Artificial Intelligence must be subject to human control, allowing humans to correct or disable it in case of unforeseen behaviour, say MEPs.

     

    The report, adopted on Wednesday with 364 votes in favour, 274 against, 52 abstentions, calls for an EU legal framework on AI with definitions and ethical principles, including its military use. It also calls on the EU and its member states to ensure AI and related technologies are human-centred (i.e. intended for the service of humanity and the common good).

    Military use and human oversight

    MEPs stress that human dignity and human rights must be respected in all EU defence-related activities. AI-enabled systems must allow humans to exert meaningful control, so they can assume responsibility and accountability for their use.

    The use of lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS) raises fundamental ethical and legal questions on human control, say MEPs, reiterating their call for an EU strategy to prohibit them as well as a ban on so-called “killer robots”. The decision to select a target and take lethal action using an autonomous weapon system must always be made by a human exercising meaningful control and judgement, in line with the principles of proportionality and necessity.

    The text calls on the EU to take a leading role in creating and promoting a global framework governing the military use of AI, alongside the UN and the international community.

    AI in the public sector

    The increased use of AI systems in public services, especially healthcare and justice, should not replace human contact or lead to discrimination, MEPs assert. People should always be informed if they are subject to a decision based on AI and be given the option to appeal it.

    When AI is used in matters of public health, (e.g. robot-assisted surgery, smart prostheses, predictive medicine), patients’ personal data must be protected and the principle of equal treatment upheld. While the use of AI technologies in the justice sector can help speed up proceedings and take more rational decisions, final court decisions must be taken by humans, be strictly verified by a person and be subject to due process.

    Mass surveillance and deepfakes

    MEPs also warn of threats to fundamental human rights and state sovereignty arising from the use of AI technologies in mass civil and military surveillance. They call for public authorities to be banned from using “highly intrusive social scoring applications” (for monitoring and rating citizens). The report also raises concerns over “deepfake technologies” that have the potential to “destabilise countries, spread disinformation and influence elections”. Creators should be obliged to label such material as “not original” and more research should be done into technology to counter this phenomenon.


    Quote

    Rapporteur Gilles Lebreton (ID, FR) said: “Faced with the multiple challenges posed by the development of AI, we need legal responses. To prepare the Commission’s legislative proposal on this subject, this report aims to put in place a framework which essentially recalls that, in any area, especially in the military field and in those managed by the state such as justice and health, AI must always remain a tool used only to assist decision-making or help when taking action. It must never replace or relieve humans of their responsibility”.

     
     

    Guidelines for military and non-military use of Artificial Intelligence 

     

    Guidelines for military and non-military use of Artificial Intelligence 

     
     

    Guidelines for military and non-military use of Artificial Intelligence 

    Guidelines for military and non-military use of Artificial Intelligence 

    Guidelines for military and non-military use of Artificial Intelligence 

    Guidelines for military and non-military use of Artificial Intelligence 

    Guidelines for military and non-military use of Artificial Intelligence 
    Guidelines for military and non-military use of Artificial Intelligence 
    Persbericht 
    Persbericht 
    Plenaire vergadering 
    Plenaire vergadering 
    Plenaire vergadering  JURI  JURIJURI 
     
     
     
    • AI can replace neither human decision-making nor human contact 
    • EU strategy prohibiting lethal autonomous weapon systems needed 
    • Call for a ban on “highly intrusive social scoring applications” by public authorities; concerns over “deepfakes” 

    Artificial Intelligence must be subject to human control, allowing humans to correct or disable it in case of unforeseen behaviour, say MEPs.

     

    The report, adopted on Wednesday with 364 votes in favour, 274 against, 52 abstentions, calls for an EU legal framework on AI with definitions and ethical principles, including its military use. It also calls on the EU and its member states to ensure AI and related technologies are human-centred (i.e. intended for the service of humanity and the common good).

    Military use and human oversight

    MEPs stress that human dignity and human rights must be respected in all EU defence-related activities. AI-enabled systems must allow humans to exert meaningful control, so they can assume responsibility and accountability for their use.

    The use of lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS) raises fundamental ethical and legal questions on human control, say MEPs, reiterating their call for an EU strategy to prohibit them as well as a ban on so-called “killer robots”. The decision to select a target and take lethal action using an autonomous weapon system must always be made by a human exercising meaningful control and judgement, in line with the principles of proportionality and necessity.

    The text calls on the EU to take a leading role in creating and promoting a global framework governing the military use of AI, alongside the UN and the international community.

    AI in the public sector

    The increased use of AI systems in public services, especially healthcare and justice, should not replace human contact or lead to discrimination, MEPs assert. People should always be informed if they are subject to a decision based on AI and be given the option to appeal it.

    When AI is used in matters of public health, (e.g. robot-assisted surgery, smart prostheses, predictive medicine), patients’ personal data must be protected and the principle of equal treatment upheld. While the use of AI technologies in the justice sector can help speed up proceedings and take more rational decisions, final court decisions must be taken by humans, be strictly verified by a person and be subject to due process.

    Mass surveillance and deepfakes

    MEPs also warn of threats to fundamental human rights and state sovereignty arising from the use of AI technologies in mass civil and military surveillance. They call for public authorities to be banned from using “highly intrusive social scoring applications” (for monitoring and rating citizens). The report also raises concerns over “deepfake technologies” that have the potential to “destabilise countries, spread disinformation and influence elections”. Creators should be obliged to label such material as “not original” and more research should be done into technology to counter this phenomenon.


    Quote

    Rapporteur Gilles Lebreton (ID, FR) said: “Faced with the multiple challenges posed by the development of AI, we need legal responses. To prepare the Commission’s legislative proposal on this subject, this report aims to put in place a framework which essentially recalls that, in any area, especially in the military field and in those managed by the state such as justice and health, AI must always remain a tool used only to assist decision-making or help when taking action. It must never replace or relieve humans of their responsibility”.

     
     
    • AI can replace neither human decision-making nor human contact 
    • EU strategy prohibiting lethal autonomous weapon systems needed 
    • Call for a ban on “highly intrusive social scoring applications” by public authorities; concerns over “deepfakes” 

    Artificial Intelligence must be subject to human control, allowing humans to correct or disable it in case of unforeseen behaviour, say MEPs.

     

    The report, adopted on Wednesday with 364 votes in favour, 274 against, 52 abstentions, calls for an EU legal framework on AI with definitions and ethical principles, including its military use. It also calls on the EU and its member states to ensure AI and related technologies are human-centred (i.e. intended for the service of humanity and the common good).

    Military use and human oversight

    MEPs stress that human dignity and human rights must be respected in all EU defence-related activities. AI-enabled systems must allow humans to exert meaningful control, so they can assume responsibility and accountability for their use.

    The use of lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS) raises fundamental ethical and legal questions on human control, say MEPs, reiterating their call for an EU strategy to prohibit them as well as a ban on so-called “killer robots”. The decision to select a target and take lethal action using an autonomous weapon system must always be made by a human exercising meaningful control and judgement, in line with the principles of proportionality and necessity.

    The text calls on the EU to take a leading role in creating and promoting a global framework governing the military use of AI, alongside the UN and the international community.

    AI in the public sector

    The increased use of AI systems in public services, especially healthcare and justice, should not replace human contact or lead to discrimination, MEPs assert. People should always be informed if they are subject to a decision based on AI and be given the option to appeal it.

    When AI is used in matters of public health, (e.g. robot-assisted surgery, smart prostheses, predictive medicine), patients’ personal data must be protected and the principle of equal treatment upheld. While the use of AI technologies in the justice sector can help speed up proceedings and take more rational decisions, final court decisions must be taken by humans, be strictly verified by a person and be subject to due process.

    Mass surveillance and deepfakes

    MEPs also warn of threats to fundamental human rights and state sovereignty arising from the use of AI technologies in mass civil and military surveillance. They call for public authorities to be banned from using “highly intrusive social scoring applications” (for monitoring and rating citizens). The report also raises concerns over “deepfake technologies” that have the potential to “destabilise countries, spread disinformation and influence elections”. Creators should be obliged to label such material as “not original” and more research should be done into technology to counter this phenomenon.


    Quote

    Rapporteur Gilles Lebreton (ID, FR) said: “Faced with the multiple challenges posed by the development of AI, we need legal responses. To prepare the Commission’s legislative proposal on this subject, this report aims to put in place a framework which essentially recalls that, in any area, especially in the military field and in those managed by the state such as justice and health, AI must always remain a tool used only to assist decision-making or help when taking action. It must never replace or relieve humans of their responsibility”.

     
     
     

    Deel deze pagina: 

    Deel deze pagina: 
    Deel deze pagina: 
  • Facebook Facebook 
  • Twitter Twitter 
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn 
  • Whatsapp Whatsapp 
    • AI can replace neither human decision-making nor human contact 
    • EU strategy prohibiting lethal autonomous weapon systems needed 
    • Call for a ban on “highly intrusive social scoring applications” by public authorities; concerns over “deepfakes” 

    Artificial Intelligence must be subject to human control, allowing humans to correct or disable it in case of unforeseen behaviour, say MEPs.

     

    The report, adopted on Wednesday with 364 votes in favour, 274 against, 52 abstentions, calls for an EU legal framework on AI with definitions and ethical principles, including its military use. It also calls on the EU and its member states to ensure AI and related technologies are human-centred (i.e. intended for the service of humanity and the common good).

    Military use and human oversight

    MEPs stress that human dignity and human rights must be respected in all EU defence-related activities. AI-enabled systems must allow humans to exert meaningful control, so they can assume responsibility and accountability for their use.

    The use of lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS) raises fundamental ethical and legal questions on human control, say MEPs, reiterating their call for an EU strategy to prohibit them as well as a ban on so-called “killer robots”. The decision to select a target and take lethal action using an autonomous weapon system must always be made by a human exercising meaningful control and judgement, in line with the principles of proportionality and necessity.

    The text calls on the EU to take a leading role in creating and promoting a global framework governing the military use of AI, alongside the UN and the international community.

    AI in the public sector

    The increased use of AI systems in public services, especially healthcare and justice, should not replace human contact or lead to discrimination, MEPs assert. People should always be informed if they are subject to a decision based on AI and be given the option to appeal it.

    When AI is used in matters of public health, (e.g. robot-assisted surgery, smart prostheses, predictive medicine), patients’ personal data must be protected and the principle of equal treatment upheld. While the use of AI technologies in the justice sector can help speed up proceedings and take more rational decisions, final court decisions must be taken by humans, be strictly verified by a person and be subject to due process.

    Mass surveillance and deepfakes

    MEPs also warn of threats to fundamental human rights and state sovereignty arising from the use of AI technologies in mass civil and military surveillance. They call for public authorities to be banned from using “highly intrusive social scoring applications” (for monitoring and rating citizens). The report also raises concerns over “deepfake technologies” that have the potential to “destabilise countries, spread disinformation and influence elections”. Creators should be obliged to label such material as “not original” and more research should be done into technology to counter this phenomenon.


    Quote

    Rapporteur Gilles Lebreton (ID, FR) said: “Faced with the multiple challenges posed by the development of AI, we need legal responses. To prepare the Commission’s legislative proposal on this subject, this report aims to put in place a framework which essentially recalls that, in any area, especially in the military field and in those managed by the state such as justice and health, AI must always remain a tool used only to assist decision-making or help when taking action. It must never replace or relieve humans of their responsibility”.

    • AI can replace neither human decision-making nor human contact 
    • EU strategy prohibiting lethal autonomous weapon systems needed 
    • Call for a ban on “highly intrusive social scoring applications” by public authorities; concerns over “deepfakes” 

    Artificial Intelligence must be subject to human control, allowing humans to correct or disable it in case of unforeseen behaviour, say MEPs.

     

    The report, adopted on Wednesday with 364 votes in favour, 274 against, 52 abstentions, calls for an EU legal framework on AI with definitions and ethical principles, including its military use. It also calls on the EU and its member states to ensure AI and related technologies are human-centred (i.e. intended for the service of humanity and the common good).

    Military use and human oversight

    MEPs stress that human dignity and human rights must be respected in all EU defence-related activities. AI-enabled systems must allow humans to exert meaningful control, so they can assume responsibility and accountability for their use.

    The use of lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS) raises fundamental ethical and legal questions on human control, say MEPs, reiterating their call for an EU strategy to prohibit them as well as a ban on so-called “killer robots”. The decision to select a target and take lethal action using an autonomous weapon system must always be made by a human exercising meaningful control and judgement, in line with the principles of proportionality and necessity.

    The text calls on the EU to take a leading role in creating and promoting a global framework governing the military use of AI, alongside the UN and the international community.

    AI in the public sector

    The increased use of AI systems in public services, especially healthcare and justice, should not replace human contact or lead to discrimination, MEPs assert. People should always be informed if they are subject to a decision based on AI and be given the option to appeal it.

    When AI is used in matters of public health, (e.g. robot-assisted surgery, smart prostheses, predictive medicine), patients’ personal data must be protected and the principle of equal treatment upheld. While the use of AI technologies in the justice sector can help speed up proceedings and take more rational decisions, final court decisions must be taken by humans, be strictly verified by a person and be subject to due process.

    Mass surveillance and deepfakes

    MEPs also warn of threats to fundamental human rights and state sovereignty arising from the use of AI technologies in mass civil and military surveillance. They call for public authorities to be banned from using “highly intrusive social scoring applications” (for monitoring and rating citizens). The report also raises concerns over “deepfake technologies” that have the potential to “destabilise countries, spread disinformation and influence elections”. Creators should be obliged to label such material as “not original” and more research should be done into technology to counter this phenomenon.


    Quote

    Rapporteur Gilles Lebreton (ID, FR) said: “Faced with the multiple challenges posed by the development of AI, we need legal responses. To prepare the Commission’s legislative proposal on this subject, this report aims to put in place a framework which essentially recalls that, in any area, especially in the military field and in those managed by the state such as justice and health, AI must always remain a tool used only to assist decision-making or help when taking action. It must never replace or relieve humans of their responsibility”.

    • AI can replace neither human decision-making nor human contact 
    • EU strategy prohibiting lethal autonomous weapon systems needed 
    • Call for a ban on “highly intrusive social scoring applications” by public authorities; concerns over “deepfakes” 

    Artificial Intelligence must be subject to human control, allowing humans to correct or disable it in case of unforeseen behaviour, say MEPs.

     

    The report, adopted on Wednesday with 364 votes in favour, 274 against, 52 abstentions, calls for an EU legal framework on AI with definitions and ethical principles, including its military use. It also calls on the EU and its member states to ensure AI and related technologies are human-centred (i.e. intended for the service of humanity and the common good).

    Military use and human oversight

    MEPs stress that human dignity and human rights must be respected in all EU defence-related activities. AI-enabled systems must allow humans to exert meaningful control, so they can assume responsibility and accountability for their use.

    The use of lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS) raises fundamental ethical and legal questions on human control, say MEPs, reiterating their call for an EU strategy to prohibit them as well as a ban on so-called “killer robots”. The decision to select a target and take lethal action using an autonomous weapon system must always be made by a human exercising meaningful control and judgement, in line with the principles of proportionality and necessity.

    The text calls on the EU to take a leading role in creating and promoting a global framework governing the military use of AI, alongside the UN and the international community.

    AI in the public sector

    The increased use of AI systems in public services, especially healthcare and justice, should not replace human contact or lead to discrimination, MEPs assert. People should always be informed if they are subject to a decision based on AI and be given the option to appeal it.

    When AI is used in matters of public health, (e.g. robot-assisted surgery, smart prostheses, predictive medicine), patients’ personal data must be protected and the principle of equal treatment upheld. While the use of AI technologies in the justice sector can help speed up proceedings and take more rational decisions, final court decisions must be taken by humans, be strictly verified by a person and be subject to due process.

    Mass surveillance and deepfakes

    MEPs also warn of threats to fundamental human rights and state sovereignty arising from the use of AI technologies in mass civil and military surveillance. They call for public authorities to be banned from using “highly intrusive social scoring applications” (for monitoring and rating citizens). The report also raises concerns over “deepfake technologies” that have the potential to “destabilise countries, spread disinformation and influence elections”. Creators should be obliged to label such material as “not original” and more research should be done into technology to counter this phenomenon.


    Quote

    Rapporteur Gilles Lebreton (ID, FR) said: “Faced with the multiple challenges posed by the development of AI, we need legal responses. To prepare the Commission’s legislative proposal on this subject, this report aims to put in place a framework which essentially recalls that, in any area, especially in the military field and in those managed by the state such as justice and health, AI must always remain a tool used only to assist decision-making or help when taking action. It must never replace or relieve humans of their responsibility”.

    • AI can replace neither human decision-making nor human contact 
    • EU strategy prohibiting lethal autonomous weapon systems needed 
    • Call for a ban on “highly intrusive social scoring applications” by public authorities; concerns over “deepfakes” 
    • AI can replace neither human decision-making nor human contact 
    • EU strategy prohibiting lethal autonomous weapon systems needed 
    • Call for a ban on “highly intrusive social scoring applications” by public authorities; concerns over “deepfakes” 
    • AI can replace neither human decision-making nor human contact 
    • EU strategy prohibiting lethal autonomous weapon systems needed 
    • Call for a ban on “highly intrusive social scoring applications” by public authorities; concerns over “deepfakes” 
    • AI can replace neither human decision-making nor human contact 
    • EU strategy prohibiting lethal autonomous weapon systems needed 
    • Call for a ban on “highly intrusive social scoring applications” by public authorities; concerns over “deepfakes” 
    • AI can replace neither human decision-making nor human contact 
    • EU strategy prohibiting lethal autonomous weapon systems needed 
    • Call for a ban on “highly intrusive social scoring applications” by public authorities; concerns over “deepfakes” 
  • AI can replace neither human decision-making nor human contact 
  • AI can replace neither human decision-making nor human contact 
    AI can replace neither human decision-making nor human contact 
  • EU strategy prohibiting lethal autonomous weapon systems needed 
  • EU strategy prohibiting lethal autonomous weapon systems needed 
    EU strategy prohibiting lethal autonomous weapon systems needed 
  • Call for a ban on “highly intrusive social scoring applications” by public authorities; concerns over “deepfakes” 
  • Call for a ban on “highly intrusive social scoring applications” by public authorities; concerns over “deepfakes” 
    Call for a ban on “highly intrusive social scoring applications” by public authorities; concerns over “deepfakes” 

    Artificial Intelligence must be subject to human control, allowing humans to correct or disable it in case of unforeseen behaviour, say MEPs.

    Artificial Intelligence must be subject to human control, allowing humans to correct or disable it in case of unforeseen behaviour, say MEPs.

    Artificial Intelligence must be subject to human control, allowing humans to correct or disable it in case of unforeseen behaviour, say MEPs.

    Artificial Intelligence must be subject to human control, allowing humans to correct or disable it in case of unforeseen behaviour, say MEPs.

     

    The report, adopted on Wednesday with 364 votes in favour, 274 against, 52 abstentions, calls for an EU legal framework on AI with definitions and ethical principles, including its military use. It also calls on the EU and its member states to ensure AI and related technologies are human-centred (i.e. intended for the service of humanity and the common good).

    Military use and human oversight

    MEPs stress that human dignity and human rights must be respected in all EU defence-related activities. AI-enabled systems must allow humans to exert meaningful control, so they can assume responsibility and accountability for their use.

    The use of lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS) raises fundamental ethical and legal questions on human control, say MEPs, reiterating their call for an EU strategy to prohibit them as well as a ban on so-called “killer robots”. The decision to select a target and take lethal action using an autonomous weapon system must always be made by a human exercising meaningful control and judgement, in line with the principles of proportionality and necessity.

    The text calls on the EU to take a leading role in creating and promoting a global framework governing the military use of AI, alongside the UN and the international community.

    AI in the public sector

    The increased use of AI systems in public services, especially healthcare and justice, should not replace human contact or lead to discrimination, MEPs assert. People should always be informed if they are subject to a decision based on AI and be given the option to appeal it.

    When AI is used in matters of public health, (e.g. robot-assisted surgery, smart prostheses, predictive medicine), patients’ personal data must be protected and the principle of equal treatment upheld. While the use of AI technologies in the justice sector can help speed up proceedings and take more rational decisions, final court decisions must be taken by humans, be strictly verified by a person and be subject to due process.

    Mass surveillance and deepfakes

    MEPs also warn of threats to fundamental human rights and state sovereignty arising from the use of AI technologies in mass civil and military surveillance. They call for public authorities to be banned from using “highly intrusive social scoring applications” (for monitoring and rating citizens). The report also raises concerns over “deepfake technologies” that have the potential to “destabilise countries, spread disinformation and influence elections”. Creators should be obliged to label such material as “not original” and more research should be done into technology to counter this phenomenon.


    Quote

    Rapporteur Gilles Lebreton (ID, FR) said: “Faced with the multiple challenges posed by the development of AI, we need legal responses. To prepare the Commission’s legislative proposal on this subject, this report aims to put in place a framework which essentially recalls that, in any area, especially in the military field and in those managed by the state such as justice and health, AI must always remain a tool used only to assist decision-making or help when taking action. It must never replace or relieve humans of their responsibility”.

     

    The report, adopted on Wednesday with 364 votes in favour, 274 against, 52 abstentions, calls for an EU legal framework on AI with definitions and ethical principles, including its military use. It also calls on the EU and its member states to ensure AI and related technologies are human-centred (i.e. intended for the service of humanity and the common good).

    Military use and human oversight

    MEPs stress that human dignity and human rights must be respected in all EU defence-related activities. AI-enabled systems must allow humans to exert meaningful control, so they can assume responsibility and accountability for their use.

    The use of lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS) raises fundamental ethical and legal questions on human control, say MEPs, reiterating their call for an EU strategy to prohibit them as well as a ban on so-called “killer robots”. The decision to select a target and take lethal action using an autonomous weapon system must always be made by a human exercising meaningful control and judgement, in line with the principles of proportionality and necessity.

    The text calls on the EU to take a leading role in creating and promoting a global framework governing the military use of AI, alongside the UN and the international community.

    AI in the public sector

    The increased use of AI systems in public services, especially healthcare and justice, should not replace human contact or lead to discrimination, MEPs assert. People should always be informed if they are subject to a decision based on AI and be given the option to appeal it.

    When AI is used in matters of public health, (e.g. robot-assisted surgery, smart prostheses, predictive medicine), patients’ personal data must be protected and the principle of equal treatment upheld. While the use of AI technologies in the justice sector can help speed up proceedings and take more rational decisions, final court decisions must be taken by humans, be strictly verified by a person and be subject to due process.

    Mass surveillance and deepfakes

    MEPs also warn of threats to fundamental human rights and state sovereignty arising from the use of AI technologies in mass civil and military surveillance. They call for public authorities to be banned from using “highly intrusive social scoring applications” (for monitoring and rating citizens). The report also raises concerns over “deepfake technologies” that have the potential to “destabilise countries, spread disinformation and influence elections”. Creators should be obliged to label such material as “not original” and more research should be done into technology to counter this phenomenon.


    Quote

    Rapporteur Gilles Lebreton (ID, FR) said: “Faced with the multiple challenges posed by the development of AI, we need legal responses. To prepare the Commission’s legislative proposal on this subject, this report aims to put in place a framework which essentially recalls that, in any area, especially in the military field and in those managed by the state such as justice and health, AI must always remain a tool used only to assist decision-making or help when taking action. It must never replace or relieve humans of their responsibility”.

     

    The report, adopted on Wednesday with 364 votes in favour, 274 against, 52 abstentions, calls for an EU legal framework on AI with definitions and ethical principles, including its military use. It also calls on the EU and its member states to ensure AI and related technologies are human-centred (i.e. intended for the service of humanity and the common good).

    Military use and human oversight

    MEPs stress that human dignity and human rights must be respected in all EU defence-related activities. AI-enabled systems must allow humans to exert meaningful control, so they can assume responsibility and accountability for their use.

    The use of lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS) raises fundamental ethical and legal questions on human control, say MEPs, reiterating their call for an EU strategy to prohibit them as well as a ban on so-called “killer robots”. The decision to select a target and take lethal action using an autonomous weapon system must always be made by a human exercising meaningful control and judgement, in line with the principles of proportionality and necessity.

    The text calls on the EU to take a leading role in creating and promoting a global framework governing the military use of AI, alongside the UN and the international community.

    AI in the public sector

    The increased use of AI systems in public services, especially healthcare and justice, should not replace human contact or lead to discrimination, MEPs assert. People should always be informed if they are subject to a decision based on AI and be given the option to appeal it.

    When AI is used in matters of public health, (e.g. robot-assisted surgery, smart prostheses, predictive medicine), patients’ personal data must be protected and the principle of equal treatment upheld. While the use of AI technologies in the justice sector can help speed up proceedings and take more rational decisions, final court decisions must be taken by humans, be strictly verified by a person and be subject to due process.

    Mass surveillance and deepfakes

    MEPs also warn of threats to fundamental human rights and state sovereignty arising from the use of AI technologies in mass civil and military surveillance. They call for public authorities to be banned from using “highly intrusive social scoring applications” (for monitoring and rating citizens). The report also raises concerns over “deepfake technologies” that have the potential to “destabilise countries, spread disinformation and influence elections”. Creators should be obliged to label such material as “not original” and more research should be done into technology to counter this phenomenon.


    Quote

    Rapporteur Gilles Lebreton (ID, FR) said: “Faced with the multiple challenges posed by the development of AI, we need legal responses. To prepare the Commission’s legislative proposal on this subject, this report aims to put in place a framework which essentially recalls that, in any area, especially in the military field and in those managed by the state such as justice and health, AI must always remain a tool used only to assist decision-making or help when taking action. It must never replace or relieve humans of their responsibility”.

     

     

    The report, adopted on Wednesday with 364 votes in favour, 274 against, 52 abstentions, calls for an EU legal framework on AI with definitions and ethical principles, including its military use. It also calls on the EU and its member states to ensure AI and related technologies are human-centred (i.e. intended for the service of humanity and the common good).

    Military use and human oversight

    Military use and human oversight

    MEPs stress that human dignity and human rights must be respected in all EU defence-related activities. AI-enabled systems must allow humans to exert meaningful control, so they can assume responsibility and accountability for their use.

    The use of lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS) raises fundamental ethical and legal questions on human control, say MEPs, reiterating their call for an EU strategy to prohibit them as well as a ban on so-called “killer robots”. The decision to select a target and take lethal action using an autonomous weapon system must always be made by a human exercising meaningful control and judgement, in line with the principles of proportionality and necessity.

    reiterating their call

    The text calls on the EU to take a leading role in creating and promoting a global framework governing the military use of AI, alongside the UN and the international community.

    AI in the public sector

    AI in the public sector

    The increased use of AI systems in public services, especially healthcare and justice, should not replace human contact or lead to discrimination, MEPs assert. People should always be informed if they are subject to a decision based on AI and be given the option to appeal it.

    When AI is used in matters of public health, (e.g. robot-assisted surgery, smart prostheses, predictive medicine), patients’ personal data must be protected and the principle of equal treatment upheld. While the use of AI technologies in the justice sector can help speed up proceedings and take more rational decisions, final court decisions must be taken by humans, be strictly verified by a person and be subject to due process.

    Mass surveillance and deepfakes

    Mass surveillance and deepfakes

    MEPs also warn of threats to fundamental human rights and state sovereignty arising from the use of AI technologies in mass civil and military surveillance. They call for public authorities to be banned from using “highly intrusive social scoring applications” (for monitoring and rating citizens). The report also raises concerns over “deepfake technologies” that have the potential to “destabilise countries, spread disinformation and influence elections”. Creators should be obliged to label such material as “not original” and more research should be done into technology to counter this phenomenon.


    Quote


    Quote

    Rapporteur Gilles Lebreton (ID, FR) said: “Faced with the multiple challenges posed by the development of AI, we need legal responses. To prepare the Commission’s legislative proposal on this subject, this report aims to put in place a framework which essentially recalls that, in any area, especially in the military field and in those managed by the state such as justice and health, AI must always remain a tool used only to assist decision-making or help when taking action. It must never replace or relieve humans of their responsibility”.

    Gilles Lebreton (ID, FR)

    Contact: 

    Contact: 
    Contact: 
  • Yasmina YAKIMOVA 

    Yasmina YAKIMOVA Yasmina YAKIMOVA 
    Press Officer 
    Press Officer Press Officer 
    Contactgegevens: 
    Contactgegevens: 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+32) 2 28 42626 (BXL) 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+32) 2 28 42626 (BXL) Telefoonnummer: (+32) 2 28 42626 (BXL)Telefoonnummer: (BXL) 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+33) 3 881 73774 (STR) 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+33) 3 881 73774 (STR) Telefoonnummer: (+33) 3 881 73774 (STR)Telefoonnummer: (STR) 
  • Mobiel telefoonnummer: (+32) 470 88 10 60 
  • Mobiel telefoonnummer: (+32) 470 88 10 60 Mobiel telefoonnummer: (+32) 470 88 10 60Mobiel telefoonnummer:  
  • E-mail: yasmina.yakimova@europarl.europa.eu 
  • E-mail: yasmina.yakimova@europarl.europa.eu E-mail: yasmina.yakimova@europarl.europa.euE-mail:  
  • E-mail: lega-press@europarl.europa.eu 
  • E-mail: lega-press@europarl.europa.eu E-mail: lega-press@europarl.europa.euE-mail:  
  • Twitteraccount: @EP_Legal 
  • Twitteraccount: @EP_Legal Twitteraccount: @EP_LegalTwitteraccount:  
     
     

    Further information 

    Further information 
    Further information 
  • Committee on Legal Affairs  Committee on Legal Affairs 
  • Procedure file   Procedure file  
  • Profile of the rapporteur - Gilles Lebreton (ID, FR)   Profile of the rapporteur - Gilles Lebreton (ID, FR)  
  • Adopted text (click 20.01.2021)   Adopted text (click 20.01.2021)  
  • AI rules: what the European Parliament wants   AI rules: what the European Parliament wants  
  • Multimedia package on Artificial Intelligence   Multimedia package on Artificial Intelligence  
  • Studies on Artificial Intelligence   Studies on Artificial Intelligence  
     
     
     
     
     

    Productinformatie 

    REF.:  20210114IPR95627 

    Productinformatie 

    Productinformatie 
    Productinformatie 
    Productinformatie 
    REF.:  20210114IPR95627 
    REF.:  20210114IPR95627 
    REF.: REF.:REF.: 20210114IPR95627 20210114IPR95627 

    Deel deze pagina: 

    Deel deze pagina: 
    Deel deze pagina: 
  • Facebook Facebook 
  • Twitter Twitter 
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn 
  • Whatsapp Whatsapp Aanmelden voor e-mailupdatesAanmelden voor e-mailupdatesPdf-versie Pdf-versie 

    Voettekst 

    Voettekst Nieuws  Bekijk het menu: nieuws  Bekijk het menu: nieuws 
    Het Parlement in uw land 
  • Brussels  
  • Brussels   Brussels 
  • Den Haag  
  • Den Haag   Den Haag Tools 
  • Wetgevingsobservatorium  
  • Wetgevingsobservatorium   Wetgevingsobservatorium 
  • Multimedia Centre  
  • Multimedia Centre   Multimedia Centre 
  • EbS  
  • EbS   EbS 
    De Voorzitter van het Europees Parlement 
  • Webpagina van de Voorzitter van het Parlement  
  • Webpagina van de Voorzitter van het Parlement   Webpagina van de Voorzitter van het Parlement  Menu verbergen: Nieuws   Menu verbergen: Nieuws Europees Parlement  Menu bekijken: Europees Parlement   Menu bekijken: Europees Parlement 
  • Nieuws 
  • Nieuws  Nieuws 
  • Leden 
  • Leden  Leden 
  • Over het Parlement 
  • Over het Parlement  Over het Parlement 
  • Plenaire vergadering 
  • Plenaire vergadering  Plenaire vergadering 
  • Commissies 
  • Commissies  Commissies 
  • Delegaties 
  • Delegaties  Delegaties Menu verbergen: Europees Parlement Menu verbergen: Europees Parlement  

    Het Parlement in de sociale media  

    Het Parlement in de sociale media 
  • Facebook  
  • Facebook   Facebook 
  • Twitter  
  • Twitter   Twitter 
  • Facebook  
  • Facebook   Facebook 
  • LinkedIn  
  • LinkedIn   LinkedIn 
  • YouTube  
  • YouTube   YouTube 
  • Instagram  
  • Instagram   Instagram 
  • Pinterest  
  • Pinterest   Pinterest 
  • Snapchat  
  • Snapchat   Snapchat 
  • Reddit  
  • Reddit   Reddit Informatieve links 
  • Contact 
  • Contact Contact 
  • RSS 
  • RSS RSS 
  • Sitemap 
  • Sitemap Sitemap 
  • Juridische mededeling 
  • Juridische mededeling Juridische mededeling 
  • Privacybeleid 
  • Privacybeleid Privacybeleid 
  • Toegankelijkheid 
  • Toegankelijkheid Toegankelijkheid