Child sexual abuse online: effective measures, no mass surveillance | Nieuws | Europees Parlement

 

Child sexual abuse online: effective measures, no mass surveillance 

Persbericht 
 
 
  • Balance between need to fight child sexual abuse online and to avoid generalised monitoring of the internet 
  • Platforms need to assess risks concerning their service 
  • If mitigation measures not enough, court-validated detection orders to be used to track down illegal material 
  • Parliament wants to exclude end-to-end encrypted material from detection 

On Tuesday, the Civil Liberties Committee adopted its position on new measures to protect children online by preventing and stopping child sexual abuse.

The draft Parliament position was adopted by the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs with 51 votes in favour, 2 against, and 1 abstaining. Inter-institutional negotiations were authorised with 48 in favour, 2 against, and 4 abstaining.

To protect children online, the new rules would mandate internet providers to assess whether there is a significant risk of their services being misused for online child sexual abuse and to solicit children, and to take measures to mitigate these risks. MEPs want mitigation measures to be targeted, proportionate and effective, and providers should be able to decide which ones to use. They also want to ensure that pornographic sites have adequate age verification systems, flagging mechanisms for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and human content moderation to process these reports.

To stop minors being solicited online, MEPs propose that services targeting children should require by default user consent for unsolicited messages, have blocking and muting options, and boost parental controls.


Detection orders


To avoid mass surveillance or generalised monitoring of the internet, the draft law would allow judicial authorities to authorise time-limited orders, as a last resort, to detect any CSAM and take it down or disable access to it, when mitigation measures are not effective in taking it down.

In addition, MEPs emphasise the need to target detection orders to individuals or groups (including subscribers to a channel) linked to child sexual abuse using “reasonable grounds of suspicion”.

In the adopted text, MEPs excluded end-to-end encryption from the scope of the detection orders to guarantee that all users’ communications are secure and confidential. Providers would be able to choose which technologies to use as long as they comply with the strong safeguards foreseen in the law, and subject to an independent, public audit of these technologies.


EU Centre for Child Protection


The law would set up an EU Centre for Child Protection to help implement the new rules and support internet providers in detecting CSAM. It would collect, filter and distribute CSAM reports to competent national authorities and Europol. The Centre would develop detection technologies for providers and maintain a database of hashes and other technical indicators of CSAM identified by national authorities.

The Centre would also support national authorities as they enforce the new child sexual abuse rulebook, conduct investigations and levy fines of up to 6% of worldwide turnover for non-compliance.

MEPs finally propose to create a new Victim’s Rights and Survivors Consultative Forum to make sure that victims’ voices are heard.


Quote


Rapporteur Javier Zarzalejos (EPP, Spain) said: “To meet this compelling challenge effectively, we have found a legally sound compromise supported by all political groups. It will create uniform rules to fight the sexual abuse of children online, meaning that all providers will have to assess if there is a risk of abuse in their services and mitigate those with tailor-made measures. As a last resort, detection orders can be used to take down abusive material still circulating on the internet. This agreement strikes a balance between protecting children and protecting privacy.”


Next steps


The draft Parliament position still needs to be endorsed by the plenary. On 20 November, the start of negotiations will be announced, and MEPs have until the end of the following day to object. If a sufficient number choose to do so, there will be a vote during the same session.

 
  • Direct naar de inhoud van de pagina (druk op "Enter")
  • Direct naar de inhoud van de pagina (druk op "Enter")Direct naar de inhoud van de pagina (druk op "Enter")
  • Rechtstreeks naar talenmenu (druk op "Enter")
  • Rechtstreeks naar talenmenu (druk op "Enter")Rechtstreeks naar talenmenu (druk op "Enter")
  • Rechtstreeks naar zoekmenu (druk op "Enter")
  • Rechtstreeks naar zoekmenu (druk op "Enter")Rechtstreeks naar zoekmenu (druk op "Enter")
  • BG - български
  • BG - български BG - българскиBG - български
  • ES - español
  • ES - español ES - españolES - español
  • CS - čeština
  • CS - čeština CS - češtinaCS - čeština
  • DA - dansk
  • DA - dansk DA - danskDA - dansk
  • DE - Deutsch
  • DE - Deutsch DE - DeutschDE - Deutsch
  • ET - eesti keel
  • ET - eesti keel ET - eesti keelET - eesti keel
  • EL - ελληνικά
  • EL - ελληνικά EL - ελληνικάEL - ελληνικά
  • EN - English
  • EN - English EN - EnglishEN - English
  • FR - français
  • FR - français FR - françaisFR - français
  • GA - Gaeilge
  • GA - Gaeilge GA - GaeilgeGA - Gaeilge
  • HR - hrvatski
  • HR - hrvatski HR - hrvatskiHR - hrvatski
  • IT - italiano
  • IT - italiano IT - italianoIT - italiano
  • LV - latviešu valoda
  • LV - latviešu valoda LV - latviešu valodaLV - latviešu valoda
  • LT - lietuvių kalba
  • LT - lietuvių kalba LT - lietuvių kalbaLT - lietuvių kalba
  • HU - magyar
  • HU - magyar HU - magyarHU - magyar
  • MT - Malti
  • MT - Malti MT - MaltiMT - Malti
  • NL - Nederlands
  • NL - Nederlands NL - NederlandsNL - Nederlands
  • PL - polski
  • PL - polski PL - polskiPL - polski
  • PT - português
  • PT - português PT - portuguêsPT - português
  • RO - română
  • RO - română RO - românăRO - română
  • SK - slovenčina
  • SK - slovenčina SK - slovenčinaSK - slovenčina
  • SL - slovenščina
  • SL - slovenščina SL - slovenščinaSL - slovenščina
  • FI - suomi
  • FI - suomi FI - suomiFI - suomi
  • SV - svenska
  • SV - svenska SV - svenskaSV - svenska
  • Naar pagina gaan Nieuws
  • Naar pagina gaan Nieuws Naar pagina gaan Nieuws Naar pagina gaanNieuws
  • Naar pagina gaan Leden
  • Naar pagina gaan Leden Naar pagina gaan Leden Naar pagina gaanLeden
  • Naar pagina gaan Over het Parlement
  • Naar pagina gaan Over het Parlement Naar pagina gaan Over het Parlement Naar pagina gaanOver het Parlement
  • Naar pagina gaan Plenaire vergadering
  • Naar pagina gaan Plenaire vergadering Naar pagina gaan Plenaire vergadering Naar pagina gaanPlenaire vergadering
  • Naar pagina gaan Commissies
  • Naar pagina gaan Commissies Naar pagina gaan Commissies Naar pagina gaanCommissies
  • Naar pagina gaan Delegaties
  • Naar pagina gaan Delegaties Naar pagina gaan Delegaties Naar pagina gaanDelegaties
  • Submenu bekijken: Andere websites Submenu bekijken:Andere websites
  • Naar pagina gaan Multimedia Centre
  • Naar pagina gaan Multimedia Centre Naar pagina gaan Multimedia Centre Naar pagina gaanMultimedia Centre
  • Naar pagina gaan Webpagina van de Voorzitter
  • Naar pagina gaan Webpagina van de Voorzitter Naar pagina gaan Webpagina van de Voorzitter Naar pagina gaanWebpagina van de Voorzitter
  • Naar pagina gaan Secretariaat-generaal
  • Naar pagina gaan Secretariaat-generaal Naar pagina gaan Secretariaat-generaal Naar pagina gaanSecretariaat-generaal
  • Naar pagina gaan Think tank
  • Naar pagina gaan Think tank Naar pagina gaan Think tank Naar pagina gaanThink tank
  • Naar pagina gaan EP Newshub
  • Naar pagina gaan EP Newshub Naar pagina gaan EP Newshub Naar pagina gaanEP Newshub
  • Naar pagina gaan Tot uw dienst
  • Naar pagina gaan Tot uw dienst Naar pagina gaan Tot uw dienst Naar pagina gaanTot uw dienst
  • Naar pagina gaan Bezoeken
  • Naar pagina gaan Bezoeken Naar pagina gaan Bezoeken Naar pagina gaanBezoeken
  • Naar pagina gaan Legislative train
  • Naar pagina gaan Legislative train Naar pagina gaan Legislative train Naar pagina gaanLegislative train
  • Naar pagina gaan Contracten en subsidies
  • Naar pagina gaan Contracten en subsidies Naar pagina gaan Contracten en subsidies Naar pagina gaanContracten en subsidies
  • Naar pagina gaan Registreren
  • Naar pagina gaan Registreren Naar pagina gaan Registreren Naar pagina gaanRegistreren
  • Naar pagina gaan Opendataportaal
  • Naar pagina gaan Opendataportaal Naar pagina gaan Opendataportaal Naar pagina gaanOpendataportaal
  • Naar pagina gaan Liaisonbureaus
  • Naar pagina gaan Liaisonbureaus Naar pagina gaan Liaisonbureaus Naar pagina gaanLiaisonbureaus
    Nieuws Europees Parlement NieuwsNieuws Europees Parlement Europees Parlement Menu Menu
  • Nieuws
  • Nieuws Nieuws Nieuws
  • Naar pagina gaan Startpagina
  • Naar pagina gaan Startpagina Naar pagina gaan Startpagina Naar pagina gaanStartpagina
  • Naar pagina gaan Europese zaken
  • Naar pagina gaan Europese zaken Naar pagina gaan Europese zaken Naar pagina gaanEuropese zaken
  • Naar pagina gaan Wereld
  • Naar pagina gaan Wereld Naar pagina gaan Wereld Naar pagina gaanWereld
  • Naar pagina gaan Economie
  • Naar pagina gaan Economie Naar pagina gaan Economie Naar pagina gaanEconomie
  • Naar pagina gaan Maatschappij
  • Naar pagina gaan Maatschappij Naar pagina gaan Maatschappij Naar pagina gaanMaatschappij
  • Naar pagina gaan Veiligheid
  • Naar pagina gaan Veiligheid Naar pagina gaan Veiligheid Naar pagina gaanVeiligheid
  • Pers
  • Pers Pers Pers
  • Naar pagina gaan Startpagina
  • Naar pagina gaan Startpagina Naar pagina gaan Startpagina Naar pagina gaanStartpagina
  • Naar pagina gaan Accreditatie
  • Naar pagina gaan Accreditatie Naar pagina gaan Accreditatie Naar pagina gaanAccreditatie
  • Naar pagina gaan Online persdossier
  • Naar pagina gaan Online persdossier Naar pagina gaan Online persdossier Naar pagina gaanOnline persdossier
  • Naar pagina gaan Contact
  • Naar pagina gaan Contact Naar pagina gaan Contact Naar pagina gaanContact
  • Agenda
  • Agenda Agenda Agenda
  • Naar pagina gaan Hoogtepunten
  • Naar pagina gaan Hoogtepunten Naar pagina gaan Hoogtepunten Naar pagina gaanHoogtepunten
  • Naar pagina gaan Wekelijkse agenda
  • Naar pagina gaan Wekelijkse agenda Naar pagina gaan Wekelijkse agenda Naar pagina gaanWekelijkse agenda
  • Naar pagina gaan Briefing
  • Naar pagina gaan Briefing Naar pagina gaan Briefing Naar pagina gaanBriefing
  • Veelgestelde vragen
  • Veelgestelde vragen Veelgestelde vragen Veelgestelde vragen
  • Naar pagina gaan Mediakit verkiezingen
  • Naar pagina gaan Mediakit verkiezingen Naar pagina gaan Mediakit verkiezingen Naar pagina gaanMediakit verkiezingenNaar het zoekveld
    Zoekopdracht starten Europees Parlement
    Terug naar pagina : Pers Pers   Huidige pagina: Child sexual abuse online: effective measures, no mass surveillance  
    Terug naar pagina : Pers Pers   Terug naar pagina : Pers Pers  Terug naar pagina : PersPers  Huidige pagina: Child sexual abuse online: effective measures, no mass surveillance   Huidige pagina: Child sexual abuse online: effective measures, no mass surveillance   Huidige pagina:Child sexual abuse online: effective measures, no mass surveillance  Terug naar pagina : Pers Pers  Terug naar pagina : PersPers 
     

    Child sexual abuse online: effective measures, no mass surveillance 

    Persbericht 
     
     
    • Balance between need to fight child sexual abuse online and to avoid generalised monitoring of the internet 
    • Platforms need to assess risks concerning their service 
    • If mitigation measures not enough, court-validated detection orders to be used to track down illegal material 
    • Parliament wants to exclude end-to-end encrypted material from detection 

    On Tuesday, the Civil Liberties Committee adopted its position on new measures to protect children online by preventing and stopping child sexual abuse.

    The draft Parliament position was adopted by the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs with 51 votes in favour, 2 against, and 1 abstaining. Inter-institutional negotiations were authorised with 48 in favour, 2 against, and 4 abstaining.

    To protect children online, the new rules would mandate internet providers to assess whether there is a significant risk of their services being misused for online child sexual abuse and to solicit children, and to take measures to mitigate these risks. MEPs want mitigation measures to be targeted, proportionate and effective, and providers should be able to decide which ones to use. They also want to ensure that pornographic sites have adequate age verification systems, flagging mechanisms for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and human content moderation to process these reports.

    To stop minors being solicited online, MEPs propose that services targeting children should require by default user consent for unsolicited messages, have blocking and muting options, and boost parental controls.


    Detection orders


    To avoid mass surveillance or generalised monitoring of the internet, the draft law would allow judicial authorities to authorise time-limited orders, as a last resort, to detect any CSAM and take it down or disable access to it, when mitigation measures are not effective in taking it down.

    In addition, MEPs emphasise the need to target detection orders to individuals or groups (including subscribers to a channel) linked to child sexual abuse using “reasonable grounds of suspicion”.

    In the adopted text, MEPs excluded end-to-end encryption from the scope of the detection orders to guarantee that all users’ communications are secure and confidential. Providers would be able to choose which technologies to use as long as they comply with the strong safeguards foreseen in the law, and subject to an independent, public audit of these technologies.


    EU Centre for Child Protection


    The law would set up an EU Centre for Child Protection to help implement the new rules and support internet providers in detecting CSAM. It would collect, filter and distribute CSAM reports to competent national authorities and Europol. The Centre would develop detection technologies for providers and maintain a database of hashes and other technical indicators of CSAM identified by national authorities.

    The Centre would also support national authorities as they enforce the new child sexual abuse rulebook, conduct investigations and levy fines of up to 6% of worldwide turnover for non-compliance.

    MEPs finally propose to create a new Victim’s Rights and Survivors Consultative Forum to make sure that victims’ voices are heard.


    Quote


    Rapporteur Javier Zarzalejos (EPP, Spain) said: “To meet this compelling challenge effectively, we have found a legally sound compromise supported by all political groups. It will create uniform rules to fight the sexual abuse of children online, meaning that all providers will have to assess if there is a risk of abuse in their services and mitigate those with tailor-made measures. As a last resort, detection orders can be used to take down abusive material still circulating on the internet. This agreement strikes a balance between protecting children and protecting privacy.”


    Next steps


    The draft Parliament position still needs to be endorsed by the plenary. On 20 November, the start of negotiations will be announced, and MEPs have until the end of the following day to object. If a sufficient number choose to do so, there will be a vote during the same session.

     
     

    Child sexual abuse online: effective measures, no mass surveillance 

    Persbericht 
     
     

    Child sexual abuse online: effective measures, no mass surveillance 

    Persbericht 
     
     
     

    Child sexual abuse online: effective measures, no mass surveillance 

    Persbericht 
     

    Child sexual abuse online: effective measures, no mass surveillance 

    Persbericht 
     

    Child sexual abuse online: effective measures, no mass surveillance 

    Persbericht 
     

    Child sexual abuse online: effective measures, no mass surveillance 

    Child sexual abuse online: effective measures, no mass surveillance 
    Child sexual abuse online: effective measures, no mass surveillance 
    Persbericht 
     
    Persbericht 
    Persbericht  LIBE  LIBELIBE 
     
     
     
    • Balance between need to fight child sexual abuse online and to avoid generalised monitoring of the internet 
    • Platforms need to assess risks concerning their service 
    • If mitigation measures not enough, court-validated detection orders to be used to track down illegal material 
    • Parliament wants to exclude end-to-end encrypted material from detection 

    On Tuesday, the Civil Liberties Committee adopted its position on new measures to protect children online by preventing and stopping child sexual abuse.

    The draft Parliament position was adopted by the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs with 51 votes in favour, 2 against, and 1 abstaining. Inter-institutional negotiations were authorised with 48 in favour, 2 against, and 4 abstaining.

    To protect children online, the new rules would mandate internet providers to assess whether there is a significant risk of their services being misused for online child sexual abuse and to solicit children, and to take measures to mitigate these risks. MEPs want mitigation measures to be targeted, proportionate and effective, and providers should be able to decide which ones to use. They also want to ensure that pornographic sites have adequate age verification systems, flagging mechanisms for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and human content moderation to process these reports.

    To stop minors being solicited online, MEPs propose that services targeting children should require by default user consent for unsolicited messages, have blocking and muting options, and boost parental controls.


    Detection orders


    To avoid mass surveillance or generalised monitoring of the internet, the draft law would allow judicial authorities to authorise time-limited orders, as a last resort, to detect any CSAM and take it down or disable access to it, when mitigation measures are not effective in taking it down.

    In addition, MEPs emphasise the need to target detection orders to individuals or groups (including subscribers to a channel) linked to child sexual abuse using “reasonable grounds of suspicion”.

    In the adopted text, MEPs excluded end-to-end encryption from the scope of the detection orders to guarantee that all users’ communications are secure and confidential. Providers would be able to choose which technologies to use as long as they comply with the strong safeguards foreseen in the law, and subject to an independent, public audit of these technologies.


    EU Centre for Child Protection


    The law would set up an EU Centre for Child Protection to help implement the new rules and support internet providers in detecting CSAM. It would collect, filter and distribute CSAM reports to competent national authorities and Europol. The Centre would develop detection technologies for providers and maintain a database of hashes and other technical indicators of CSAM identified by national authorities.

    The Centre would also support national authorities as they enforce the new child sexual abuse rulebook, conduct investigations and levy fines of up to 6% of worldwide turnover for non-compliance.

    MEPs finally propose to create a new Victim’s Rights and Survivors Consultative Forum to make sure that victims’ voices are heard.


    Quote


    Rapporteur Javier Zarzalejos (EPP, Spain) said: “To meet this compelling challenge effectively, we have found a legally sound compromise supported by all political groups. It will create uniform rules to fight the sexual abuse of children online, meaning that all providers will have to assess if there is a risk of abuse in their services and mitigate those with tailor-made measures. As a last resort, detection orders can be used to take down abusive material still circulating on the internet. This agreement strikes a balance between protecting children and protecting privacy.”


    Next steps


    The draft Parliament position still needs to be endorsed by the plenary. On 20 November, the start of negotiations will be announced, and MEPs have until the end of the following day to object. If a sufficient number choose to do so, there will be a vote during the same session.

     
     
    • Balance between need to fight child sexual abuse online and to avoid generalised monitoring of the internet 
    • Platforms need to assess risks concerning their service 
    • If mitigation measures not enough, court-validated detection orders to be used to track down illegal material 
    • Parliament wants to exclude end-to-end encrypted material from detection 

    On Tuesday, the Civil Liberties Committee adopted its position on new measures to protect children online by preventing and stopping child sexual abuse.

    The draft Parliament position was adopted by the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs with 51 votes in favour, 2 against, and 1 abstaining. Inter-institutional negotiations were authorised with 48 in favour, 2 against, and 4 abstaining.

    To protect children online, the new rules would mandate internet providers to assess whether there is a significant risk of their services being misused for online child sexual abuse and to solicit children, and to take measures to mitigate these risks. MEPs want mitigation measures to be targeted, proportionate and effective, and providers should be able to decide which ones to use. They also want to ensure that pornographic sites have adequate age verification systems, flagging mechanisms for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and human content moderation to process these reports.

    To stop minors being solicited online, MEPs propose that services targeting children should require by default user consent for unsolicited messages, have blocking and muting options, and boost parental controls.


    Detection orders


    To avoid mass surveillance or generalised monitoring of the internet, the draft law would allow judicial authorities to authorise time-limited orders, as a last resort, to detect any CSAM and take it down or disable access to it, when mitigation measures are not effective in taking it down.

    In addition, MEPs emphasise the need to target detection orders to individuals or groups (including subscribers to a channel) linked to child sexual abuse using “reasonable grounds of suspicion”.

    In the adopted text, MEPs excluded end-to-end encryption from the scope of the detection orders to guarantee that all users’ communications are secure and confidential. Providers would be able to choose which technologies to use as long as they comply with the strong safeguards foreseen in the law, and subject to an independent, public audit of these technologies.


    EU Centre for Child Protection


    The law would set up an EU Centre for Child Protection to help implement the new rules and support internet providers in detecting CSAM. It would collect, filter and distribute CSAM reports to competent national authorities and Europol. The Centre would develop detection technologies for providers and maintain a database of hashes and other technical indicators of CSAM identified by national authorities.

    The Centre would also support national authorities as they enforce the new child sexual abuse rulebook, conduct investigations and levy fines of up to 6% of worldwide turnover for non-compliance.

    MEPs finally propose to create a new Victim’s Rights and Survivors Consultative Forum to make sure that victims’ voices are heard.


    Quote


    Rapporteur Javier Zarzalejos (EPP, Spain) said: “To meet this compelling challenge effectively, we have found a legally sound compromise supported by all political groups. It will create uniform rules to fight the sexual abuse of children online, meaning that all providers will have to assess if there is a risk of abuse in their services and mitigate those with tailor-made measures. As a last resort, detection orders can be used to take down abusive material still circulating on the internet. This agreement strikes a balance between protecting children and protecting privacy.”


    Next steps


    The draft Parliament position still needs to be endorsed by the plenary. On 20 November, the start of negotiations will be announced, and MEPs have until the end of the following day to object. If a sufficient number choose to do so, there will be a vote during the same session.

     
     
     

    Deel deze pagina: 

    Deel deze pagina: 
    Deel deze pagina: 
  • Facebook Facebook 
  • Twitter Twitter 
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn 
  • WhatsApp WhatsApp 
    • Balance between need to fight child sexual abuse online and to avoid generalised monitoring of the internet 
    • Platforms need to assess risks concerning their service 
    • If mitigation measures not enough, court-validated detection orders to be used to track down illegal material 
    • Parliament wants to exclude end-to-end encrypted material from detection 

    On Tuesday, the Civil Liberties Committee adopted its position on new measures to protect children online by preventing and stopping child sexual abuse.

    The draft Parliament position was adopted by the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs with 51 votes in favour, 2 against, and 1 abstaining. Inter-institutional negotiations were authorised with 48 in favour, 2 against, and 4 abstaining.

    To protect children online, the new rules would mandate internet providers to assess whether there is a significant risk of their services being misused for online child sexual abuse and to solicit children, and to take measures to mitigate these risks. MEPs want mitigation measures to be targeted, proportionate and effective, and providers should be able to decide which ones to use. They also want to ensure that pornographic sites have adequate age verification systems, flagging mechanisms for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and human content moderation to process these reports.

    To stop minors being solicited online, MEPs propose that services targeting children should require by default user consent for unsolicited messages, have blocking and muting options, and boost parental controls.


    Detection orders


    To avoid mass surveillance or generalised monitoring of the internet, the draft law would allow judicial authorities to authorise time-limited orders, as a last resort, to detect any CSAM and take it down or disable access to it, when mitigation measures are not effective in taking it down.

    In addition, MEPs emphasise the need to target detection orders to individuals or groups (including subscribers to a channel) linked to child sexual abuse using “reasonable grounds of suspicion”.

    In the adopted text, MEPs excluded end-to-end encryption from the scope of the detection orders to guarantee that all users’ communications are secure and confidential. Providers would be able to choose which technologies to use as long as they comply with the strong safeguards foreseen in the law, and subject to an independent, public audit of these technologies.


    EU Centre for Child Protection


    The law would set up an EU Centre for Child Protection to help implement the new rules and support internet providers in detecting CSAM. It would collect, filter and distribute CSAM reports to competent national authorities and Europol. The Centre would develop detection technologies for providers and maintain a database of hashes and other technical indicators of CSAM identified by national authorities.

    The Centre would also support national authorities as they enforce the new child sexual abuse rulebook, conduct investigations and levy fines of up to 6% of worldwide turnover for non-compliance.

    MEPs finally propose to create a new Victim’s Rights and Survivors Consultative Forum to make sure that victims’ voices are heard.


    Quote


    Rapporteur Javier Zarzalejos (EPP, Spain) said: “To meet this compelling challenge effectively, we have found a legally sound compromise supported by all political groups. It will create uniform rules to fight the sexual abuse of children online, meaning that all providers will have to assess if there is a risk of abuse in their services and mitigate those with tailor-made measures. As a last resort, detection orders can be used to take down abusive material still circulating on the internet. This agreement strikes a balance between protecting children and protecting privacy.”


    Next steps


    The draft Parliament position still needs to be endorsed by the plenary. On 20 November, the start of negotiations will be announced, and MEPs have until the end of the following day to object. If a sufficient number choose to do so, there will be a vote during the same session.

    • Balance between need to fight child sexual abuse online and to avoid generalised monitoring of the internet 
    • Platforms need to assess risks concerning their service 
    • If mitigation measures not enough, court-validated detection orders to be used to track down illegal material 
    • Parliament wants to exclude end-to-end encrypted material from detection 

    On Tuesday, the Civil Liberties Committee adopted its position on new measures to protect children online by preventing and stopping child sexual abuse.

    The draft Parliament position was adopted by the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs with 51 votes in favour, 2 against, and 1 abstaining. Inter-institutional negotiations were authorised with 48 in favour, 2 against, and 4 abstaining.

    To protect children online, the new rules would mandate internet providers to assess whether there is a significant risk of their services being misused for online child sexual abuse and to solicit children, and to take measures to mitigate these risks. MEPs want mitigation measures to be targeted, proportionate and effective, and providers should be able to decide which ones to use. They also want to ensure that pornographic sites have adequate age verification systems, flagging mechanisms for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and human content moderation to process these reports.

    To stop minors being solicited online, MEPs propose that services targeting children should require by default user consent for unsolicited messages, have blocking and muting options, and boost parental controls.


    Detection orders


    To avoid mass surveillance or generalised monitoring of the internet, the draft law would allow judicial authorities to authorise time-limited orders, as a last resort, to detect any CSAM and take it down or disable access to it, when mitigation measures are not effective in taking it down.

    In addition, MEPs emphasise the need to target detection orders to individuals or groups (including subscribers to a channel) linked to child sexual abuse using “reasonable grounds of suspicion”.

    In the adopted text, MEPs excluded end-to-end encryption from the scope of the detection orders to guarantee that all users’ communications are secure and confidential. Providers would be able to choose which technologies to use as long as they comply with the strong safeguards foreseen in the law, and subject to an independent, public audit of these technologies.


    EU Centre for Child Protection


    The law would set up an EU Centre for Child Protection to help implement the new rules and support internet providers in detecting CSAM. It would collect, filter and distribute CSAM reports to competent national authorities and Europol. The Centre would develop detection technologies for providers and maintain a database of hashes and other technical indicators of CSAM identified by national authorities.

    The Centre would also support national authorities as they enforce the new child sexual abuse rulebook, conduct investigations and levy fines of up to 6% of worldwide turnover for non-compliance.

    MEPs finally propose to create a new Victim’s Rights and Survivors Consultative Forum to make sure that victims’ voices are heard.


    Quote


    Rapporteur Javier Zarzalejos (EPP, Spain) said: “To meet this compelling challenge effectively, we have found a legally sound compromise supported by all political groups. It will create uniform rules to fight the sexual abuse of children online, meaning that all providers will have to assess if there is a risk of abuse in their services and mitigate those with tailor-made measures. As a last resort, detection orders can be used to take down abusive material still circulating on the internet. This agreement strikes a balance between protecting children and protecting privacy.”


    Next steps


    The draft Parliament position still needs to be endorsed by the plenary. On 20 November, the start of negotiations will be announced, and MEPs have until the end of the following day to object. If a sufficient number choose to do so, there will be a vote during the same session.

    • Balance between need to fight child sexual abuse online and to avoid generalised monitoring of the internet 
    • Platforms need to assess risks concerning their service 
    • If mitigation measures not enough, court-validated detection orders to be used to track down illegal material 
    • Parliament wants to exclude end-to-end encrypted material from detection 

    On Tuesday, the Civil Liberties Committee adopted its position on new measures to protect children online by preventing and stopping child sexual abuse.

    The draft Parliament position was adopted by the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs with 51 votes in favour, 2 against, and 1 abstaining. Inter-institutional negotiations were authorised with 48 in favour, 2 against, and 4 abstaining.

    To protect children online, the new rules would mandate internet providers to assess whether there is a significant risk of their services being misused for online child sexual abuse and to solicit children, and to take measures to mitigate these risks. MEPs want mitigation measures to be targeted, proportionate and effective, and providers should be able to decide which ones to use. They also want to ensure that pornographic sites have adequate age verification systems, flagging mechanisms for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and human content moderation to process these reports.

    To stop minors being solicited online, MEPs propose that services targeting children should require by default user consent for unsolicited messages, have blocking and muting options, and boost parental controls.


    Detection orders


    To avoid mass surveillance or generalised monitoring of the internet, the draft law would allow judicial authorities to authorise time-limited orders, as a last resort, to detect any CSAM and take it down or disable access to it, when mitigation measures are not effective in taking it down.

    In addition, MEPs emphasise the need to target detection orders to individuals or groups (including subscribers to a channel) linked to child sexual abuse using “reasonable grounds of suspicion”.

    In the adopted text, MEPs excluded end-to-end encryption from the scope of the detection orders to guarantee that all users’ communications are secure and confidential. Providers would be able to choose which technologies to use as long as they comply with the strong safeguards foreseen in the law, and subject to an independent, public audit of these technologies.


    EU Centre for Child Protection


    The law would set up an EU Centre for Child Protection to help implement the new rules and support internet providers in detecting CSAM. It would collect, filter and distribute CSAM reports to competent national authorities and Europol. The Centre would develop detection technologies for providers and maintain a database of hashes and other technical indicators of CSAM identified by national authorities.

    The Centre would also support national authorities as they enforce the new child sexual abuse rulebook, conduct investigations and levy fines of up to 6% of worldwide turnover for non-compliance.

    MEPs finally propose to create a new Victim’s Rights and Survivors Consultative Forum to make sure that victims’ voices are heard.


    Quote


    Rapporteur Javier Zarzalejos (EPP, Spain) said: “To meet this compelling challenge effectively, we have found a legally sound compromise supported by all political groups. It will create uniform rules to fight the sexual abuse of children online, meaning that all providers will have to assess if there is a risk of abuse in their services and mitigate those with tailor-made measures. As a last resort, detection orders can be used to take down abusive material still circulating on the internet. This agreement strikes a balance between protecting children and protecting privacy.”


    Next steps


    The draft Parliament position still needs to be endorsed by the plenary. On 20 November, the start of negotiations will be announced, and MEPs have until the end of the following day to object. If a sufficient number choose to do so, there will be a vote during the same session.

    • Balance between need to fight child sexual abuse online and to avoid generalised monitoring of the internet 
    • Platforms need to assess risks concerning their service 
    • If mitigation measures not enough, court-validated detection orders to be used to track down illegal material 
    • Parliament wants to exclude end-to-end encrypted material from detection 
    • Balance between need to fight child sexual abuse online and to avoid generalised monitoring of the internet 
    • Platforms need to assess risks concerning their service 
    • If mitigation measures not enough, court-validated detection orders to be used to track down illegal material 
    • Parliament wants to exclude end-to-end encrypted material from detection 
    • Balance between need to fight child sexual abuse online and to avoid generalised monitoring of the internet 
    • Platforms need to assess risks concerning their service 
    • If mitigation measures not enough, court-validated detection orders to be used to track down illegal material 
    • Parliament wants to exclude end-to-end encrypted material from detection 
    • Balance between need to fight child sexual abuse online and to avoid generalised monitoring of the internet 
    • Platforms need to assess risks concerning their service 
    • If mitigation measures not enough, court-validated detection orders to be used to track down illegal material 
    • Parliament wants to exclude end-to-end encrypted material from detection 
    • Balance between need to fight child sexual abuse online and to avoid generalised monitoring of the internet 
    • Platforms need to assess risks concerning their service 
    • If mitigation measures not enough, court-validated detection orders to be used to track down illegal material 
    • Parliament wants to exclude end-to-end encrypted material from detection 
  • Balance between need to fight child sexual abuse online and to avoid generalised monitoring of the internet 
  • Balance between need to fight child sexual abuse online and to avoid generalised monitoring of the internet 
    Balance between need to fight child sexual abuse online and to avoid generalised monitoring of the internet 
  • Platforms need to assess risks concerning their service 
  • Platforms need to assess risks concerning their service 
    Platforms need to assess risks concerning their service 
  • If mitigation measures not enough, court-validated detection orders to be used to track down illegal material 
  • If mitigation measures not enough, court-validated detection orders to be used to track down illegal material 
    If mitigation measures not enough, court-validated detection orders to be used to track down illegal material 
  • Parliament wants to exclude end-to-end encrypted material from detection 
  • Parliament wants to exclude end-to-end encrypted material from detection 
    Parliament wants to exclude end-to-end encrypted material from detection 

    On Tuesday, the Civil Liberties Committee adopted its position on new measures to protect children online by preventing and stopping child sexual abuse.

    On Tuesday, the Civil Liberties Committee adopted its position on new measures to protect children online by preventing and stopping child sexual abuse.

    On Tuesday, the Civil Liberties Committee adopted its position on new measures to protect children online by preventing and stopping child sexual abuse.

    On Tuesday, the Civil Liberties Committee adopted its position on new measures to protect children online by preventing and stopping child sexual abuse.

    The draft Parliament position was adopted by the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs with 51 votes in favour, 2 against, and 1 abstaining. Inter-institutional negotiations were authorised with 48 in favour, 2 against, and 4 abstaining.

    To protect children online, the new rules would mandate internet providers to assess whether there is a significant risk of their services being misused for online child sexual abuse and to solicit children, and to take measures to mitigate these risks. MEPs want mitigation measures to be targeted, proportionate and effective, and providers should be able to decide which ones to use. They also want to ensure that pornographic sites have adequate age verification systems, flagging mechanisms for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and human content moderation to process these reports.

    To stop minors being solicited online, MEPs propose that services targeting children should require by default user consent for unsolicited messages, have blocking and muting options, and boost parental controls.


    Detection orders


    To avoid mass surveillance or generalised monitoring of the internet, the draft law would allow judicial authorities to authorise time-limited orders, as a last resort, to detect any CSAM and take it down or disable access to it, when mitigation measures are not effective in taking it down.

    In addition, MEPs emphasise the need to target detection orders to individuals or groups (including subscribers to a channel) linked to child sexual abuse using “reasonable grounds of suspicion”.

    In the adopted text, MEPs excluded end-to-end encryption from the scope of the detection orders to guarantee that all users’ communications are secure and confidential. Providers would be able to choose which technologies to use as long as they comply with the strong safeguards foreseen in the law, and subject to an independent, public audit of these technologies.


    EU Centre for Child Protection


    The law would set up an EU Centre for Child Protection to help implement the new rules and support internet providers in detecting CSAM. It would collect, filter and distribute CSAM reports to competent national authorities and Europol. The Centre would develop detection technologies for providers and maintain a database of hashes and other technical indicators of CSAM identified by national authorities.

    The Centre would also support national authorities as they enforce the new child sexual abuse rulebook, conduct investigations and levy fines of up to 6% of worldwide turnover for non-compliance.

    MEPs finally propose to create a new Victim’s Rights and Survivors Consultative Forum to make sure that victims’ voices are heard.


    Quote


    Rapporteur Javier Zarzalejos (EPP, Spain) said: “To meet this compelling challenge effectively, we have found a legally sound compromise supported by all political groups. It will create uniform rules to fight the sexual abuse of children online, meaning that all providers will have to assess if there is a risk of abuse in their services and mitigate those with tailor-made measures. As a last resort, detection orders can be used to take down abusive material still circulating on the internet. This agreement strikes a balance between protecting children and protecting privacy.”


    Next steps


    The draft Parliament position still needs to be endorsed by the plenary. On 20 November, the start of negotiations will be announced, and MEPs have until the end of the following day to object. If a sufficient number choose to do so, there will be a vote during the same session.

    The draft Parliament position was adopted by the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs with 51 votes in favour, 2 against, and 1 abstaining. Inter-institutional negotiations were authorised with 48 in favour, 2 against, and 4 abstaining.

    To protect children online, the new rules would mandate internet providers to assess whether there is a significant risk of their services being misused for online child sexual abuse and to solicit children, and to take measures to mitigate these risks. MEPs want mitigation measures to be targeted, proportionate and effective, and providers should be able to decide which ones to use. They also want to ensure that pornographic sites have adequate age verification systems, flagging mechanisms for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and human content moderation to process these reports.

    To stop minors being solicited online, MEPs propose that services targeting children should require by default user consent for unsolicited messages, have blocking and muting options, and boost parental controls.


    Detection orders


    To avoid mass surveillance or generalised monitoring of the internet, the draft law would allow judicial authorities to authorise time-limited orders, as a last resort, to detect any CSAM and take it down or disable access to it, when mitigation measures are not effective in taking it down.

    In addition, MEPs emphasise the need to target detection orders to individuals or groups (including subscribers to a channel) linked to child sexual abuse using “reasonable grounds of suspicion”.

    In the adopted text, MEPs excluded end-to-end encryption from the scope of the detection orders to guarantee that all users’ communications are secure and confidential. Providers would be able to choose which technologies to use as long as they comply with the strong safeguards foreseen in the law, and subject to an independent, public audit of these technologies.


    EU Centre for Child Protection


    The law would set up an EU Centre for Child Protection to help implement the new rules and support internet providers in detecting CSAM. It would collect, filter and distribute CSAM reports to competent national authorities and Europol. The Centre would develop detection technologies for providers and maintain a database of hashes and other technical indicators of CSAM identified by national authorities.

    The Centre would also support national authorities as they enforce the new child sexual abuse rulebook, conduct investigations and levy fines of up to 6% of worldwide turnover for non-compliance.

    MEPs finally propose to create a new Victim’s Rights and Survivors Consultative Forum to make sure that victims’ voices are heard.


    Quote


    Rapporteur Javier Zarzalejos (EPP, Spain) said: “To meet this compelling challenge effectively, we have found a legally sound compromise supported by all political groups. It will create uniform rules to fight the sexual abuse of children online, meaning that all providers will have to assess if there is a risk of abuse in their services and mitigate those with tailor-made measures. As a last resort, detection orders can be used to take down abusive material still circulating on the internet. This agreement strikes a balance between protecting children and protecting privacy.”


    Next steps


    The draft Parliament position still needs to be endorsed by the plenary. On 20 November, the start of negotiations will be announced, and MEPs have until the end of the following day to object. If a sufficient number choose to do so, there will be a vote during the same session.

    The draft Parliament position was adopted by the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs with 51 votes in favour, 2 against, and 1 abstaining. Inter-institutional negotiations were authorised with 48 in favour, 2 against, and 4 abstaining.

    To protect children online, the new rules would mandate internet providers to assess whether there is a significant risk of their services being misused for online child sexual abuse and to solicit children, and to take measures to mitigate these risks. MEPs want mitigation measures to be targeted, proportionate and effective, and providers should be able to decide which ones to use. They also want to ensure that pornographic sites have adequate age verification systems, flagging mechanisms for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and human content moderation to process these reports.

    To stop minors being solicited online, MEPs propose that services targeting children should require by default user consent for unsolicited messages, have blocking and muting options, and boost parental controls.


    Detection orders


    To avoid mass surveillance or generalised monitoring of the internet, the draft law would allow judicial authorities to authorise time-limited orders, as a last resort, to detect any CSAM and take it down or disable access to it, when mitigation measures are not effective in taking it down.

    In addition, MEPs emphasise the need to target detection orders to individuals or groups (including subscribers to a channel) linked to child sexual abuse using “reasonable grounds of suspicion”.

    In the adopted text, MEPs excluded end-to-end encryption from the scope of the detection orders to guarantee that all users’ communications are secure and confidential. Providers would be able to choose which technologies to use as long as they comply with the strong safeguards foreseen in the law, and subject to an independent, public audit of these technologies.


    EU Centre for Child Protection


    The law would set up an EU Centre for Child Protection to help implement the new rules and support internet providers in detecting CSAM. It would collect, filter and distribute CSAM reports to competent national authorities and Europol. The Centre would develop detection technologies for providers and maintain a database of hashes and other technical indicators of CSAM identified by national authorities.

    The Centre would also support national authorities as they enforce the new child sexual abuse rulebook, conduct investigations and levy fines of up to 6% of worldwide turnover for non-compliance.

    MEPs finally propose to create a new Victim’s Rights and Survivors Consultative Forum to make sure that victims’ voices are heard.


    Quote


    Rapporteur Javier Zarzalejos (EPP, Spain) said: “To meet this compelling challenge effectively, we have found a legally sound compromise supported by all political groups. It will create uniform rules to fight the sexual abuse of children online, meaning that all providers will have to assess if there is a risk of abuse in their services and mitigate those with tailor-made measures. As a last resort, detection orders can be used to take down abusive material still circulating on the internet. This agreement strikes a balance between protecting children and protecting privacy.”


    Next steps


    The draft Parliament position still needs to be endorsed by the plenary. On 20 November, the start of negotiations will be announced, and MEPs have until the end of the following day to object. If a sufficient number choose to do so, there will be a vote during the same session.

    The draft Parliament position was adopted by the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs with 51 votes in favour, 2 against, and 1 abstaining. Inter-institutional negotiations were authorised with 48 in favour, 2 against, and 4 abstaining.

    To protect children online, the new rules would mandate internet providers to assess whether there is a significant risk of their services being misused for online child sexual abuse and to solicit children, and to take measures to mitigate these risks. MEPs want mitigation measures to be targeted, proportionate and effective, and providers should be able to decide which ones to use. They also want to ensure that pornographic sites have adequate age verification systems, flagging mechanisms for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and human content moderation to process these reports.

    To stop minors being solicited online, MEPs propose that services targeting children should require by default user consent for unsolicited messages, have blocking and muting options, and boost parental controls.


    Detection orders


    Detection orders


    To avoid mass surveillance or generalised monitoring of the internet, the draft law would allow judicial authorities to authorise time-limited orders, as a last resort, to detect any CSAM and take it down or disable access to it, when mitigation measures are not effective in taking it down.


    In addition, MEPs emphasise the need to target detection orders to individuals or groups (including subscribers to a channel) linked to child sexual abuse using “reasonable grounds of suspicion”.

    In the adopted text, MEPs excluded end-to-end encryption from the scope of the detection orders to guarantee that all users’ communications are secure and confidential. Providers would be able to choose which technologies to use as long as they comply with the strong safeguards foreseen in the law, and subject to an independent, public audit of these technologies.


    EU Centre for Child Protection


    EU Centre for Child Protection


    The law would set up an EU Centre for Child Protection to help implement the new rules and support internet providers in detecting CSAM. It would collect, filter and distribute CSAM reports to competent national authorities and Europol. The Centre would develop detection technologies for providers and maintain a database of hashes and other technical indicators of CSAM identified by national authorities.


    The Centre would also support national authorities as they enforce the new child sexual abuse rulebook, conduct investigations and levy fines of up to 6% of worldwide turnover for non-compliance.

    MEPs finally propose to create a new Victim’s Rights and Survivors Consultative Forum to make sure that victims’ voices are heard.


    Quote


    Quote


    Rapporteur Javier Zarzalejos (EPP, Spain) said: “To meet this compelling challenge effectively, we have found a legally sound compromise supported by all political groups. It will create uniform rules to fight the sexual abuse of children online, meaning that all providers will have to assess if there is a risk of abuse in their services and mitigate those with tailor-made measures. As a last resort, detection orders can be used to take down abusive material still circulating on the internet. This agreement strikes a balance between protecting children and protecting privacy.”


    Javier Zarzalejos


    Next steps


    Next steps


    The draft Parliament position still needs to be endorsed by the plenary. On 20 November, the start of negotiations will be announced, and MEPs have until the end of the following day to object. If a sufficient number choose to do so, there will be a vote during the same session.


    MEPs have until the end of the following day to object

    Contact: 

    Contact: 
    Contact: 
  • Janne OJAMO 

    Janne OJAMO Janne OJAMO 
    Press Officer 
    Press Officer Press Officer 
    Contactgegevens: 
    Contactgegevens: 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+32) 2 284 12 50 (BXL) 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+32) 2 284 12 50 (BXL) Telefoonnummer: (+32) 2 284 12 50 (BXL)Telefoonnummer: (BXL) 
  • Mobiel telefoonnummer: (+32) 470 89 21 92 
  • Mobiel telefoonnummer: (+32) 470 89 21 92 Mobiel telefoonnummer: (+32) 470 89 21 92Mobiel telefoonnummer:  
  • E-mail: janne.ojamo@europarl.europa.eu 
  • E-mail: janne.ojamo@europarl.europa.eu E-mail: janne.ojamo@europarl.europa.euE-mail:  
  • E-mail: libe-press@europarl.europa.eu 
  • E-mail: libe-press@europarl.europa.eu E-mail: libe-press@europarl.europa.euE-mail:  
  • Twitteraccount: @EP_Justice 
  • Twitteraccount: @EP_Justice Twitteraccount: @EP_JusticeTwitteraccount:  
     
     

    Further information 

    Further information 
    Further information 
  • Documents, including compromise amendments  Documents, including compromise amendments 
  • Procedure file  Procedure file 
  • EP Study: Combating child sexual abuse online (12 June 2023)  EP Study: Combating child sexual abuse online (12 June 2023) 
  • Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs  Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 
     
     
     
     
     

    Productinformatie 

    REF.:  20231110IPR10118 

    Productinformatie 

    Productinformatie 
    Productinformatie 
    Productinformatie 
    REF.:  20231110IPR10118 
    REF.:  20231110IPR10118 
    REF.: REF.:REF.: 20231110IPR10118 20231110IPR10118 

    Deel deze pagina: 

    Deel deze pagina: 
    Deel deze pagina: 
  • Facebook Facebook 
  • Twitter Twitter 
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn 
  • WhatsApp WhatsApp Aanmelden voor e-mailupdatesAanmelden voor e-mailupdatesPdf-versie Pdf-versie Nieuws  Bekijk het menu: nieuws  Bekijk het menu: nieuws Het Parlement in uw land 
  • Open als nieuwe pagina Brussels
  • Open als nieuwe pagina Brussels Open als nieuwe paginaBrussels
  • Open als nieuwe pagina Den Haag
  • Open als nieuwe pagina Den Haag Open als nieuwe paginaDen HaagTools 
  • Open als nieuwe pagina Wetgevingsobservatorium
  • Open als nieuwe pagina Wetgevingsobservatorium Open als nieuwe paginaWetgevingsobservatorium
  • Naar pagina gaan Multimedia Centre
  • Naar pagina gaan Multimedia Centre Naar pagina gaanMultimedia Centre
  • Open als nieuwe pagina EbS
  • Open als nieuwe pagina EbS Open als nieuwe paginaEbSDe Voorzitter van het Europees Parlement 
  • Open als nieuwe pagina Webpagina van de Voorzitter van het Parlement
  • Open als nieuwe pagina Webpagina van de Voorzitter van het Parlement Open als nieuwe paginaWebpagina van de Voorzitter van het Parlement Menu verbergen: Nieuws   Menu verbergen: Nieuws Europees Parlement  Menu bekijken: Europees Parlement   Menu bekijken: Europees Parlement 
  • Naar pagina gaan Nieuws 
  • Naar pagina gaan Nieuws  Naar pagina gaanNieuws 
  • Naar pagina gaan Leden 
  • Naar pagina gaan Leden  Naar pagina gaanLeden 
  • Naar pagina gaan Over het Parlement 
  • Naar pagina gaan Over het Parlement  Naar pagina gaanOver het Parlement 
  • Naar pagina gaan Plenaire vergadering 
  • Naar pagina gaan Plenaire vergadering  Naar pagina gaanPlenaire vergadering 
  • Naar pagina gaan Commissies 
  • Naar pagina gaan Commissies  Naar pagina gaanCommissies 
  • Naar pagina gaan Delegaties 
  • Naar pagina gaan Delegaties  Naar pagina gaanDelegaties Menu verbergen: Europees Parlement Menu verbergen: Europees Parlement  

    Het Parlement in de sociale media  

    Het Parlement in de sociale media 
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Facebook  
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Facebook   Bekijk het Parlement op Facebook 
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Twitter  
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Twitter   Bekijk het Parlement op Twitter 
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Flickr  
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Flickr   Bekijk het Parlement op Flickr 
  • Bekijk het Parlement op LinkedIn  
  • Bekijk het Parlement op LinkedIn   Bekijk het Parlement op LinkedIn 
  • Bekijk het Parlement op YouTube  
  • Bekijk het Parlement op YouTube   Bekijk het Parlement op YouTube 
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Instagram  
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Instagram   Bekijk het Parlement op Instagram 
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Pinterest  
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Pinterest   Bekijk het Parlement op Pinterest 
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Snapchat  
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Snapchat   Bekijk het Parlement op Snapchat 
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Reddit  
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Reddit   Bekijk het Parlement op Reddit Informatieve links 
  • Naar pagina gaanContact 
  • Naar pagina gaanContact Naar pagina gaanContact 
  • Naar pagina gaanRSS 
  • Naar pagina gaanRSS Naar pagina gaanRSS 
  • Naar pagina gaanSitemap 
  • Naar pagina gaanSitemap Naar pagina gaanSitemap 
  • Naar pagina gaanJuridische mededeling 
  • Naar pagina gaanJuridische mededeling Naar pagina gaanJuridische mededeling 
  • Naar pagina gaanPrivacybeleid 
  • Naar pagina gaanPrivacybeleid Naar pagina gaanPrivacybeleid 
  • Naar pagina gaanToegankelijkheid 
  • Naar pagina gaanToegankelijkheid Naar pagina gaanToegankelijkheid