Deal on the EU Media Freedom Act | Nieuws | Europees Parlement

 

Deal on the EU Media Freedom Act 

Persbericht 
 
 

Parliament and Council negotiators agreed on Friday on a new bill to protect EU journalists from growing threats to media freedom and the industry’s viability.

According to the provisional political agreement between the co-legislators, reached on 15 December 2023 on the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), member states will have to ensure that citizens have access to a plurality of editorially independent media content.

Particularly, EU countries will have to ensure the editorial and functional independence of public media by:

- appointing heads and board members through transparent and non-discriminatory procedures. Their term of office will have to be long enough to guarantee the media’s independence, and dismissing them before the end of their term will be prohibited, except when they no longer meet their performance criteria (judicial review possible);

- transparent and objective funding procedures, as well as sustainable and predictable funding to safeguard independence;

- independent monitoring of media’s political independence, with public reports.

Protection of journalists’ work

Member state authorities will be prohibited from interfering with editorial decisions.

MEPs secured a prohibition on journalists and editors having to disclose their sources, including by detainment, sanctions, office searches or by installing intrusive surveillance software on their devices.

By way of derogation, such interferences will only be permitted on a case-by-case basis ‘by an overriding reason of public interest’, subject to authorisation by a judicial authority. In order to use intrusive surveillance software against journalists, it will also need to be justified for investigations of serious crimes punishable by a custodial sentence in the respective member state. In this case, surveillance measures will have to be regularly reviewed by the judiciary.

Even in these cases, the right of subjects to be informed about ongoing surveillance as well as having to have judicial protection will apply.

Ownership transparency

To assess media independence, the EMFA will oblige media, including micro-enterprises, to publish information on their direct and indirect owners, including if they are directly or indirectly owned by the state or a public authority, in a national database.

Media will also have to report on funds received from state advertising and on state financial support. This includes funds from non-EU countries.

Provisions against big platforms making arbitrary decisions

MEPs successfully negotiated the creation of a system to ensure that decisions on content moderation by very large online platforms do not negatively affect media freedom.

Platforms will first have to distinguish independent media from non-independent sources. Media would be notified that the platform intends to delete or restrict their content and have 24 hours to respond (shorter timeframe in case of crisis).

If after the reply (or in absence of it) the platform still considers the media content does not comply with its conditions, it can proceed with deleting or restricting. However, if the media considers that the decision does not have sufficient grounds and undermines media freedom, they have the right to bring the case to an out-of-court dispute settlement body and request an opinion from the European Board for Media Services (a new EU board of national regulators to be set up by the EMFA).

Fair allocation of state advertising

To ensure media outlets do not become dependent on state advertising, public funds to media service providers or online platforms will be allocated via open and non-discriminatory procedures, based on public criteria. Member states will have to distribute state advertising expenditure to a wide plurality of media.

Public authorities will publish information every year about their state advertising expenditure, the total annual amount spent and the amounts spent per media service provider or online platform.

Quotes

“This is a huge win for media freedom,” rapporteur Sabine Verheyen (EPP, DE) said after the deal was agreed. “We have managed to secure all of Parliament's most important demands: editors will be more independent in their decisions, media ownership will be more transparent, and media freedom will not be restricted by big platforms. This is a significant legislative milestone to safeguard the diversity and freedom of our media and protect our democracies”.

“Today’s deal is nothing less than recognition. Recognition of the huge effort and hard work that all journalists do every day, risking their lives to preserve our democracies,” LIBE rapporteur Ramona Strugariu (Renew, RO) said. “It is a huge step towards protecting media freedom and securing a safe environment for journalists and media workers. They deserve it.”

Next steps

The deal has to be formally approved by the Committee on Culture and Education (January tbc) and by the Parliament as a whole (March plenary tbc), as well as by the Council.

 
  • Direct naar de inhoud van de pagina (druk op "Enter")
  • Direct naar de inhoud van de pagina (druk op "Enter")Direct naar de inhoud van de pagina (druk op "Enter")
  • Rechtstreeks naar talenmenu (druk op "Enter")
  • Rechtstreeks naar talenmenu (druk op "Enter")Rechtstreeks naar talenmenu (druk op "Enter")
  • Rechtstreeks naar zoekmenu (druk op "Enter")
  • Rechtstreeks naar zoekmenu (druk op "Enter")Rechtstreeks naar zoekmenu (druk op "Enter")
  • BG - български
  • BG - български BG - българскиBG - български
  • ES - español
  • ES - español ES - españolES - español
  • CS - čeština
  • CS - čeština CS - češtinaCS - čeština
  • DA - dansk
  • DA - dansk DA - danskDA - dansk
  • DE - Deutsch
  • DE - Deutsch DE - DeutschDE - Deutsch
  • ET - eesti keel
  • ET - eesti keel ET - eesti keelET - eesti keel
  • EL - ελληνικά
  • EL - ελληνικά EL - ελληνικάEL - ελληνικά
  • EN - English
  • EN - English EN - EnglishEN - English
  • FR - français
  • FR - français FR - françaisFR - français
  • GA - Gaeilge
  • GA - Gaeilge GA - GaeilgeGA - Gaeilge
  • HR - hrvatski
  • HR - hrvatski HR - hrvatskiHR - hrvatski
  • IT - italiano
  • IT - italiano IT - italianoIT - italiano
  • LV - latviešu valoda
  • LV - latviešu valoda LV - latviešu valodaLV - latviešu valoda
  • LT - lietuvių kalba
  • LT - lietuvių kalba LT - lietuvių kalbaLT - lietuvių kalba
  • HU - magyar
  • HU - magyar HU - magyarHU - magyar
  • MT - Malti
  • MT - Malti MT - MaltiMT - Malti
  • NL - Nederlands
  • NL - Nederlands NL - NederlandsNL - Nederlands
  • PL - polski
  • PL - polski PL - polskiPL - polski
  • PT - português
  • PT - português PT - portuguêsPT - português
  • RO - română
  • RO - română RO - românăRO - română
  • SK - slovenčina
  • SK - slovenčina SK - slovenčinaSK - slovenčina
  • SL - slovenščina
  • SL - slovenščina SL - slovenščinaSL - slovenščina
  • FI - suomi
  • FI - suomi FI - suomiFI - suomi
  • SV - svenska
  • SV - svenska SV - svenskaSV - svenska
  • Naar pagina gaan Nieuws
  • Naar pagina gaan Nieuws Naar pagina gaan Nieuws Naar pagina gaanNieuws
  • Naar pagina gaan Leden
  • Naar pagina gaan Leden Naar pagina gaan Leden Naar pagina gaanLeden
  • Naar pagina gaan Over het Parlement
  • Naar pagina gaan Over het Parlement Naar pagina gaan Over het Parlement Naar pagina gaanOver het Parlement
  • Naar pagina gaan Plenaire vergadering
  • Naar pagina gaan Plenaire vergadering Naar pagina gaan Plenaire vergadering Naar pagina gaanPlenaire vergadering
  • Naar pagina gaan Commissies
  • Naar pagina gaan Commissies Naar pagina gaan Commissies Naar pagina gaanCommissies
  • Naar pagina gaan Delegaties
  • Naar pagina gaan Delegaties Naar pagina gaan Delegaties Naar pagina gaanDelegaties
  • Submenu bekijken: Andere websites Submenu bekijken:Andere websites
  • Naar pagina gaan Multimedia Centre
  • Naar pagina gaan Multimedia Centre Naar pagina gaan Multimedia Centre Naar pagina gaanMultimedia Centre
  • Naar pagina gaan Webpagina van de Voorzitter
  • Naar pagina gaan Webpagina van de Voorzitter Naar pagina gaan Webpagina van de Voorzitter Naar pagina gaanWebpagina van de Voorzitter
  • Naar pagina gaan Secretariaat-generaal
  • Naar pagina gaan Secretariaat-generaal Naar pagina gaan Secretariaat-generaal Naar pagina gaanSecretariaat-generaal
  • Naar pagina gaan Think tank
  • Naar pagina gaan Think tank Naar pagina gaan Think tank Naar pagina gaanThink tank
  • Naar pagina gaan EP Newshub
  • Naar pagina gaan EP Newshub Naar pagina gaan EP Newshub Naar pagina gaanEP Newshub
  • Naar pagina gaan Tot uw dienst
  • Naar pagina gaan Tot uw dienst Naar pagina gaan Tot uw dienst Naar pagina gaanTot uw dienst
  • Naar pagina gaan Bezoeken
  • Naar pagina gaan Bezoeken Naar pagina gaan Bezoeken Naar pagina gaanBezoeken
  • Naar pagina gaan Legislative train
  • Naar pagina gaan Legislative train Naar pagina gaan Legislative train Naar pagina gaanLegislative train
  • Naar pagina gaan Contracten en subsidies
  • Naar pagina gaan Contracten en subsidies Naar pagina gaan Contracten en subsidies Naar pagina gaanContracten en subsidies
  • Naar pagina gaan Registreren
  • Naar pagina gaan Registreren Naar pagina gaan Registreren Naar pagina gaanRegistreren
  • Naar pagina gaan Opendataportaal
  • Naar pagina gaan Opendataportaal Naar pagina gaan Opendataportaal Naar pagina gaanOpendataportaal
  • Naar pagina gaan Liaisonbureaus
  • Naar pagina gaan Liaisonbureaus Naar pagina gaan Liaisonbureaus Naar pagina gaanLiaisonbureaus
    Nieuws Europees Parlement NieuwsNieuws Europees Parlement Europees Parlement Menu Menu
  • Nieuws
  • Nieuws Nieuws Nieuws
  • Naar pagina gaan Startpagina
  • Naar pagina gaan Startpagina Naar pagina gaan Startpagina Naar pagina gaanStartpagina
  • Naar pagina gaan Europese zaken
  • Naar pagina gaan Europese zaken Naar pagina gaan Europese zaken Naar pagina gaanEuropese zaken
  • Naar pagina gaan Wereld
  • Naar pagina gaan Wereld Naar pagina gaan Wereld Naar pagina gaanWereld
  • Naar pagina gaan Economie
  • Naar pagina gaan Economie Naar pagina gaan Economie Naar pagina gaanEconomie
  • Naar pagina gaan Maatschappij
  • Naar pagina gaan Maatschappij Naar pagina gaan Maatschappij Naar pagina gaanMaatschappij
  • Naar pagina gaan Veiligheid
  • Naar pagina gaan Veiligheid Naar pagina gaan Veiligheid Naar pagina gaanVeiligheid
  • Pers
  • Pers Pers Pers
  • Naar pagina gaan Startpagina
  • Naar pagina gaan Startpagina Naar pagina gaan Startpagina Naar pagina gaanStartpagina
  • Naar pagina gaan Accreditatie
  • Naar pagina gaan Accreditatie Naar pagina gaan Accreditatie Naar pagina gaanAccreditatie
  • Naar pagina gaan Online persdossier
  • Naar pagina gaan Online persdossier Naar pagina gaan Online persdossier Naar pagina gaanOnline persdossier
  • Naar pagina gaan Contact
  • Naar pagina gaan Contact Naar pagina gaan Contact Naar pagina gaanContact
  • Agenda
  • Agenda Agenda Agenda
  • Naar pagina gaan Hoogtepunten
  • Naar pagina gaan Hoogtepunten Naar pagina gaan Hoogtepunten Naar pagina gaanHoogtepunten
  • Naar pagina gaan Wekelijkse agenda
  • Naar pagina gaan Wekelijkse agenda Naar pagina gaan Wekelijkse agenda Naar pagina gaanWekelijkse agenda
  • Naar pagina gaan Briefing
  • Naar pagina gaan Briefing Naar pagina gaan Briefing Naar pagina gaanBriefing
  • Veelgestelde vragen
  • Veelgestelde vragen Veelgestelde vragen Veelgestelde vragen
  • Naar pagina gaan Mediakit verkiezingen
  • Naar pagina gaan Mediakit verkiezingen Naar pagina gaan Mediakit verkiezingen Naar pagina gaanMediakit verkiezingenNaar het zoekveld
    Zoekopdracht starten Europees Parlement
    Terug naar pagina : Pers Pers   Huidige pagina: Deal on the EU Media Freedom Act  
    Terug naar pagina : Pers Pers   Terug naar pagina : Pers Pers  Terug naar pagina : PersPers  Huidige pagina: Deal on the EU Media Freedom Act   Huidige pagina: Deal on the EU Media Freedom Act   Huidige pagina:Deal on the EU Media Freedom Act  Terug naar pagina : Pers Pers  Terug naar pagina : PersPers 
     

    Deal on the EU Media Freedom Act 

    Persbericht 
     
     

    Parliament and Council negotiators agreed on Friday on a new bill to protect EU journalists from growing threats to media freedom and the industry’s viability.

    According to the provisional political agreement between the co-legislators, reached on 15 December 2023 on the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), member states will have to ensure that citizens have access to a plurality of editorially independent media content.

    Particularly, EU countries will have to ensure the editorial and functional independence of public media by:

    - appointing heads and board members through transparent and non-discriminatory procedures. Their term of office will have to be long enough to guarantee the media’s independence, and dismissing them before the end of their term will be prohibited, except when they no longer meet their performance criteria (judicial review possible);

    - transparent and objective funding procedures, as well as sustainable and predictable funding to safeguard independence;

    - independent monitoring of media’s political independence, with public reports.

    Protection of journalists’ work

    Member state authorities will be prohibited from interfering with editorial decisions.

    MEPs secured a prohibition on journalists and editors having to disclose their sources, including by detainment, sanctions, office searches or by installing intrusive surveillance software on their devices.

    By way of derogation, such interferences will only be permitted on a case-by-case basis ‘by an overriding reason of public interest’, subject to authorisation by a judicial authority. In order to use intrusive surveillance software against journalists, it will also need to be justified for investigations of serious crimes punishable by a custodial sentence in the respective member state. In this case, surveillance measures will have to be regularly reviewed by the judiciary.

    Even in these cases, the right of subjects to be informed about ongoing surveillance as well as having to have judicial protection will apply.

    Ownership transparency

    To assess media independence, the EMFA will oblige media, including micro-enterprises, to publish information on their direct and indirect owners, including if they are directly or indirectly owned by the state or a public authority, in a national database.

    Media will also have to report on funds received from state advertising and on state financial support. This includes funds from non-EU countries.

    Provisions against big platforms making arbitrary decisions

    MEPs successfully negotiated the creation of a system to ensure that decisions on content moderation by very large online platforms do not negatively affect media freedom.

    Platforms will first have to distinguish independent media from non-independent sources. Media would be notified that the platform intends to delete or restrict their content and have 24 hours to respond (shorter timeframe in case of crisis).

    If after the reply (or in absence of it) the platform still considers the media content does not comply with its conditions, it can proceed with deleting or restricting. However, if the media considers that the decision does not have sufficient grounds and undermines media freedom, they have the right to bring the case to an out-of-court dispute settlement body and request an opinion from the European Board for Media Services (a new EU board of national regulators to be set up by the EMFA).

    Fair allocation of state advertising

    To ensure media outlets do not become dependent on state advertising, public funds to media service providers or online platforms will be allocated via open and non-discriminatory procedures, based on public criteria. Member states will have to distribute state advertising expenditure to a wide plurality of media.

    Public authorities will publish information every year about their state advertising expenditure, the total annual amount spent and the amounts spent per media service provider or online platform.

    Quotes

    “This is a huge win for media freedom,” rapporteur Sabine Verheyen (EPP, DE) said after the deal was agreed. “We have managed to secure all of Parliament's most important demands: editors will be more independent in their decisions, media ownership will be more transparent, and media freedom will not be restricted by big platforms. This is a significant legislative milestone to safeguard the diversity and freedom of our media and protect our democracies”.

    “Today’s deal is nothing less than recognition. Recognition of the huge effort and hard work that all journalists do every day, risking their lives to preserve our democracies,” LIBE rapporteur Ramona Strugariu (Renew, RO) said. “It is a huge step towards protecting media freedom and securing a safe environment for journalists and media workers. They deserve it.”

    Next steps

    The deal has to be formally approved by the Committee on Culture and Education (January tbc) and by the Parliament as a whole (March plenary tbc), as well as by the Council.

     
     

    Deal on the EU Media Freedom Act 

    Persbericht 
     
     

    Deal on the EU Media Freedom Act 

    Persbericht 
     
     
     

    Deal on the EU Media Freedom Act 

    Persbericht 
     

    Deal on the EU Media Freedom Act 

    Persbericht 
     

    Deal on the EU Media Freedom Act 

    Persbericht 
     

    Deal on the EU Media Freedom Act 

    Deal on the EU Media Freedom Act 
    Deal on the EU Media Freedom Act 
    Persbericht 
     
    Persbericht 
    Persbericht  CULT  CULTCULT 
     
     
     

    Parliament and Council negotiators agreed on Friday on a new bill to protect EU journalists from growing threats to media freedom and the industry’s viability.

    According to the provisional political agreement between the co-legislators, reached on 15 December 2023 on the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), member states will have to ensure that citizens have access to a plurality of editorially independent media content.

    Particularly, EU countries will have to ensure the editorial and functional independence of public media by:

    - appointing heads and board members through transparent and non-discriminatory procedures. Their term of office will have to be long enough to guarantee the media’s independence, and dismissing them before the end of their term will be prohibited, except when they no longer meet their performance criteria (judicial review possible);

    - transparent and objective funding procedures, as well as sustainable and predictable funding to safeguard independence;

    - independent monitoring of media’s political independence, with public reports.

    Protection of journalists’ work

    Member state authorities will be prohibited from interfering with editorial decisions.

    MEPs secured a prohibition on journalists and editors having to disclose their sources, including by detainment, sanctions, office searches or by installing intrusive surveillance software on their devices.

    By way of derogation, such interferences will only be permitted on a case-by-case basis ‘by an overriding reason of public interest’, subject to authorisation by a judicial authority. In order to use intrusive surveillance software against journalists, it will also need to be justified for investigations of serious crimes punishable by a custodial sentence in the respective member state. In this case, surveillance measures will have to be regularly reviewed by the judiciary.

    Even in these cases, the right of subjects to be informed about ongoing surveillance as well as having to have judicial protection will apply.

    Ownership transparency

    To assess media independence, the EMFA will oblige media, including micro-enterprises, to publish information on their direct and indirect owners, including if they are directly or indirectly owned by the state or a public authority, in a national database.

    Media will also have to report on funds received from state advertising and on state financial support. This includes funds from non-EU countries.

    Provisions against big platforms making arbitrary decisions

    MEPs successfully negotiated the creation of a system to ensure that decisions on content moderation by very large online platforms do not negatively affect media freedom.

    Platforms will first have to distinguish independent media from non-independent sources. Media would be notified that the platform intends to delete or restrict their content and have 24 hours to respond (shorter timeframe in case of crisis).

    If after the reply (or in absence of it) the platform still considers the media content does not comply with its conditions, it can proceed with deleting or restricting. However, if the media considers that the decision does not have sufficient grounds and undermines media freedom, they have the right to bring the case to an out-of-court dispute settlement body and request an opinion from the European Board for Media Services (a new EU board of national regulators to be set up by the EMFA).

    Fair allocation of state advertising

    To ensure media outlets do not become dependent on state advertising, public funds to media service providers or online platforms will be allocated via open and non-discriminatory procedures, based on public criteria. Member states will have to distribute state advertising expenditure to a wide plurality of media.

    Public authorities will publish information every year about their state advertising expenditure, the total annual amount spent and the amounts spent per media service provider or online platform.

    Quotes

    “This is a huge win for media freedom,” rapporteur Sabine Verheyen (EPP, DE) said after the deal was agreed. “We have managed to secure all of Parliament's most important demands: editors will be more independent in their decisions, media ownership will be more transparent, and media freedom will not be restricted by big platforms. This is a significant legislative milestone to safeguard the diversity and freedom of our media and protect our democracies”.

    “Today’s deal is nothing less than recognition. Recognition of the huge effort and hard work that all journalists do every day, risking their lives to preserve our democracies,” LIBE rapporteur Ramona Strugariu (Renew, RO) said. “It is a huge step towards protecting media freedom and securing a safe environment for journalists and media workers. They deserve it.”

    Next steps

    The deal has to be formally approved by the Committee on Culture and Education (January tbc) and by the Parliament as a whole (March plenary tbc), as well as by the Council.

     
     

    Parliament and Council negotiators agreed on Friday on a new bill to protect EU journalists from growing threats to media freedom and the industry’s viability.

    According to the provisional political agreement between the co-legislators, reached on 15 December 2023 on the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), member states will have to ensure that citizens have access to a plurality of editorially independent media content.

    Particularly, EU countries will have to ensure the editorial and functional independence of public media by:

    - appointing heads and board members through transparent and non-discriminatory procedures. Their term of office will have to be long enough to guarantee the media’s independence, and dismissing them before the end of their term will be prohibited, except when they no longer meet their performance criteria (judicial review possible);

    - transparent and objective funding procedures, as well as sustainable and predictable funding to safeguard independence;

    - independent monitoring of media’s political independence, with public reports.

    Protection of journalists’ work

    Member state authorities will be prohibited from interfering with editorial decisions.

    MEPs secured a prohibition on journalists and editors having to disclose their sources, including by detainment, sanctions, office searches or by installing intrusive surveillance software on their devices.

    By way of derogation, such interferences will only be permitted on a case-by-case basis ‘by an overriding reason of public interest’, subject to authorisation by a judicial authority. In order to use intrusive surveillance software against journalists, it will also need to be justified for investigations of serious crimes punishable by a custodial sentence in the respective member state. In this case, surveillance measures will have to be regularly reviewed by the judiciary.

    Even in these cases, the right of subjects to be informed about ongoing surveillance as well as having to have judicial protection will apply.

    Ownership transparency

    To assess media independence, the EMFA will oblige media, including micro-enterprises, to publish information on their direct and indirect owners, including if they are directly or indirectly owned by the state or a public authority, in a national database.

    Media will also have to report on funds received from state advertising and on state financial support. This includes funds from non-EU countries.

    Provisions against big platforms making arbitrary decisions

    MEPs successfully negotiated the creation of a system to ensure that decisions on content moderation by very large online platforms do not negatively affect media freedom.

    Platforms will first have to distinguish independent media from non-independent sources. Media would be notified that the platform intends to delete or restrict their content and have 24 hours to respond (shorter timeframe in case of crisis).

    If after the reply (or in absence of it) the platform still considers the media content does not comply with its conditions, it can proceed with deleting or restricting. However, if the media considers that the decision does not have sufficient grounds and undermines media freedom, they have the right to bring the case to an out-of-court dispute settlement body and request an opinion from the European Board for Media Services (a new EU board of national regulators to be set up by the EMFA).

    Fair allocation of state advertising

    To ensure media outlets do not become dependent on state advertising, public funds to media service providers or online platforms will be allocated via open and non-discriminatory procedures, based on public criteria. Member states will have to distribute state advertising expenditure to a wide plurality of media.

    Public authorities will publish information every year about their state advertising expenditure, the total annual amount spent and the amounts spent per media service provider or online platform.

    Quotes

    “This is a huge win for media freedom,” rapporteur Sabine Verheyen (EPP, DE) said after the deal was agreed. “We have managed to secure all of Parliament's most important demands: editors will be more independent in their decisions, media ownership will be more transparent, and media freedom will not be restricted by big platforms. This is a significant legislative milestone to safeguard the diversity and freedom of our media and protect our democracies”.

    “Today’s deal is nothing less than recognition. Recognition of the huge effort and hard work that all journalists do every day, risking their lives to preserve our democracies,” LIBE rapporteur Ramona Strugariu (Renew, RO) said. “It is a huge step towards protecting media freedom and securing a safe environment for journalists and media workers. They deserve it.”

    Next steps

    The deal has to be formally approved by the Committee on Culture and Education (January tbc) and by the Parliament as a whole (March plenary tbc), as well as by the Council.

     
     
     

    Deel deze pagina: 

    Deel deze pagina: 
    Deel deze pagina: 
  • Facebook Facebook 
  • Twitter Twitter 
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn 
  • WhatsApp WhatsApp 

    Parliament and Council negotiators agreed on Friday on a new bill to protect EU journalists from growing threats to media freedom and the industry’s viability.

    According to the provisional political agreement between the co-legislators, reached on 15 December 2023 on the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), member states will have to ensure that citizens have access to a plurality of editorially independent media content.

    Particularly, EU countries will have to ensure the editorial and functional independence of public media by:

    - appointing heads and board members through transparent and non-discriminatory procedures. Their term of office will have to be long enough to guarantee the media’s independence, and dismissing them before the end of their term will be prohibited, except when they no longer meet their performance criteria (judicial review possible);

    - transparent and objective funding procedures, as well as sustainable and predictable funding to safeguard independence;

    - independent monitoring of media’s political independence, with public reports.

    Protection of journalists’ work

    Member state authorities will be prohibited from interfering with editorial decisions.

    MEPs secured a prohibition on journalists and editors having to disclose their sources, including by detainment, sanctions, office searches or by installing intrusive surveillance software on their devices.

    By way of derogation, such interferences will only be permitted on a case-by-case basis ‘by an overriding reason of public interest’, subject to authorisation by a judicial authority. In order to use intrusive surveillance software against journalists, it will also need to be justified for investigations of serious crimes punishable by a custodial sentence in the respective member state. In this case, surveillance measures will have to be regularly reviewed by the judiciary.

    Even in these cases, the right of subjects to be informed about ongoing surveillance as well as having to have judicial protection will apply.

    Ownership transparency

    To assess media independence, the EMFA will oblige media, including micro-enterprises, to publish information on their direct and indirect owners, including if they are directly or indirectly owned by the state or a public authority, in a national database.

    Media will also have to report on funds received from state advertising and on state financial support. This includes funds from non-EU countries.

    Provisions against big platforms making arbitrary decisions

    MEPs successfully negotiated the creation of a system to ensure that decisions on content moderation by very large online platforms do not negatively affect media freedom.

    Platforms will first have to distinguish independent media from non-independent sources. Media would be notified that the platform intends to delete or restrict their content and have 24 hours to respond (shorter timeframe in case of crisis).

    If after the reply (or in absence of it) the platform still considers the media content does not comply with its conditions, it can proceed with deleting or restricting. However, if the media considers that the decision does not have sufficient grounds and undermines media freedom, they have the right to bring the case to an out-of-court dispute settlement body and request an opinion from the European Board for Media Services (a new EU board of national regulators to be set up by the EMFA).

    Fair allocation of state advertising

    To ensure media outlets do not become dependent on state advertising, public funds to media service providers or online platforms will be allocated via open and non-discriminatory procedures, based on public criteria. Member states will have to distribute state advertising expenditure to a wide plurality of media.

    Public authorities will publish information every year about their state advertising expenditure, the total annual amount spent and the amounts spent per media service provider or online platform.

    Quotes

    “This is a huge win for media freedom,” rapporteur Sabine Verheyen (EPP, DE) said after the deal was agreed. “We have managed to secure all of Parliament's most important demands: editors will be more independent in their decisions, media ownership will be more transparent, and media freedom will not be restricted by big platforms. This is a significant legislative milestone to safeguard the diversity and freedom of our media and protect our democracies”.

    “Today’s deal is nothing less than recognition. Recognition of the huge effort and hard work that all journalists do every day, risking their lives to preserve our democracies,” LIBE rapporteur Ramona Strugariu (Renew, RO) said. “It is a huge step towards protecting media freedom and securing a safe environment for journalists and media workers. They deserve it.”

    Next steps

    The deal has to be formally approved by the Committee on Culture and Education (January tbc) and by the Parliament as a whole (March plenary tbc), as well as by the Council.

    Parliament and Council negotiators agreed on Friday on a new bill to protect EU journalists from growing threats to media freedom and the industry’s viability.

    According to the provisional political agreement between the co-legislators, reached on 15 December 2023 on the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), member states will have to ensure that citizens have access to a plurality of editorially independent media content.

    Particularly, EU countries will have to ensure the editorial and functional independence of public media by:

    - appointing heads and board members through transparent and non-discriminatory procedures. Their term of office will have to be long enough to guarantee the media’s independence, and dismissing them before the end of their term will be prohibited, except when they no longer meet their performance criteria (judicial review possible);

    - transparent and objective funding procedures, as well as sustainable and predictable funding to safeguard independence;

    - independent monitoring of media’s political independence, with public reports.

    Protection of journalists’ work

    Member state authorities will be prohibited from interfering with editorial decisions.

    MEPs secured a prohibition on journalists and editors having to disclose their sources, including by detainment, sanctions, office searches or by installing intrusive surveillance software on their devices.

    By way of derogation, such interferences will only be permitted on a case-by-case basis ‘by an overriding reason of public interest’, subject to authorisation by a judicial authority. In order to use intrusive surveillance software against journalists, it will also need to be justified for investigations of serious crimes punishable by a custodial sentence in the respective member state. In this case, surveillance measures will have to be regularly reviewed by the judiciary.

    Even in these cases, the right of subjects to be informed about ongoing surveillance as well as having to have judicial protection will apply.

    Ownership transparency

    To assess media independence, the EMFA will oblige media, including micro-enterprises, to publish information on their direct and indirect owners, including if they are directly or indirectly owned by the state or a public authority, in a national database.

    Media will also have to report on funds received from state advertising and on state financial support. This includes funds from non-EU countries.

    Provisions against big platforms making arbitrary decisions

    MEPs successfully negotiated the creation of a system to ensure that decisions on content moderation by very large online platforms do not negatively affect media freedom.

    Platforms will first have to distinguish independent media from non-independent sources. Media would be notified that the platform intends to delete or restrict their content and have 24 hours to respond (shorter timeframe in case of crisis).

    If after the reply (or in absence of it) the platform still considers the media content does not comply with its conditions, it can proceed with deleting or restricting. However, if the media considers that the decision does not have sufficient grounds and undermines media freedom, they have the right to bring the case to an out-of-court dispute settlement body and request an opinion from the European Board for Media Services (a new EU board of national regulators to be set up by the EMFA).

    Fair allocation of state advertising

    To ensure media outlets do not become dependent on state advertising, public funds to media service providers or online platforms will be allocated via open and non-discriminatory procedures, based on public criteria. Member states will have to distribute state advertising expenditure to a wide plurality of media.

    Public authorities will publish information every year about their state advertising expenditure, the total annual amount spent and the amounts spent per media service provider or online platform.

    Quotes

    “This is a huge win for media freedom,” rapporteur Sabine Verheyen (EPP, DE) said after the deal was agreed. “We have managed to secure all of Parliament's most important demands: editors will be more independent in their decisions, media ownership will be more transparent, and media freedom will not be restricted by big platforms. This is a significant legislative milestone to safeguard the diversity and freedom of our media and protect our democracies”.

    “Today’s deal is nothing less than recognition. Recognition of the huge effort and hard work that all journalists do every day, risking their lives to preserve our democracies,” LIBE rapporteur Ramona Strugariu (Renew, RO) said. “It is a huge step towards protecting media freedom and securing a safe environment for journalists and media workers. They deserve it.”

    Next steps

    The deal has to be formally approved by the Committee on Culture and Education (January tbc) and by the Parliament as a whole (March plenary tbc), as well as by the Council.

    Parliament and Council negotiators agreed on Friday on a new bill to protect EU journalists from growing threats to media freedom and the industry’s viability.

    According to the provisional political agreement between the co-legislators, reached on 15 December 2023 on the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), member states will have to ensure that citizens have access to a plurality of editorially independent media content.

    Particularly, EU countries will have to ensure the editorial and functional independence of public media by:

    - appointing heads and board members through transparent and non-discriminatory procedures. Their term of office will have to be long enough to guarantee the media’s independence, and dismissing them before the end of their term will be prohibited, except when they no longer meet their performance criteria (judicial review possible);

    - transparent and objective funding procedures, as well as sustainable and predictable funding to safeguard independence;

    - independent monitoring of media’s political independence, with public reports.

    Protection of journalists’ work

    Member state authorities will be prohibited from interfering with editorial decisions.

    MEPs secured a prohibition on journalists and editors having to disclose their sources, including by detainment, sanctions, office searches or by installing intrusive surveillance software on their devices.

    By way of derogation, such interferences will only be permitted on a case-by-case basis ‘by an overriding reason of public interest’, subject to authorisation by a judicial authority. In order to use intrusive surveillance software against journalists, it will also need to be justified for investigations of serious crimes punishable by a custodial sentence in the respective member state. In this case, surveillance measures will have to be regularly reviewed by the judiciary.

    Even in these cases, the right of subjects to be informed about ongoing surveillance as well as having to have judicial protection will apply.

    Ownership transparency

    To assess media independence, the EMFA will oblige media, including micro-enterprises, to publish information on their direct and indirect owners, including if they are directly or indirectly owned by the state or a public authority, in a national database.

    Media will also have to report on funds received from state advertising and on state financial support. This includes funds from non-EU countries.

    Provisions against big platforms making arbitrary decisions

    MEPs successfully negotiated the creation of a system to ensure that decisions on content moderation by very large online platforms do not negatively affect media freedom.

    Platforms will first have to distinguish independent media from non-independent sources. Media would be notified that the platform intends to delete or restrict their content and have 24 hours to respond (shorter timeframe in case of crisis).

    If after the reply (or in absence of it) the platform still considers the media content does not comply with its conditions, it can proceed with deleting or restricting. However, if the media considers that the decision does not have sufficient grounds and undermines media freedom, they have the right to bring the case to an out-of-court dispute settlement body and request an opinion from the European Board for Media Services (a new EU board of national regulators to be set up by the EMFA).

    Fair allocation of state advertising

    To ensure media outlets do not become dependent on state advertising, public funds to media service providers or online platforms will be allocated via open and non-discriminatory procedures, based on public criteria. Member states will have to distribute state advertising expenditure to a wide plurality of media.

    Public authorities will publish information every year about their state advertising expenditure, the total annual amount spent and the amounts spent per media service provider or online platform.

    Quotes

    “This is a huge win for media freedom,” rapporteur Sabine Verheyen (EPP, DE) said after the deal was agreed. “We have managed to secure all of Parliament's most important demands: editors will be more independent in their decisions, media ownership will be more transparent, and media freedom will not be restricted by big platforms. This is a significant legislative milestone to safeguard the diversity and freedom of our media and protect our democracies”.

    “Today’s deal is nothing less than recognition. Recognition of the huge effort and hard work that all journalists do every day, risking their lives to preserve our democracies,” LIBE rapporteur Ramona Strugariu (Renew, RO) said. “It is a huge step towards protecting media freedom and securing a safe environment for journalists and media workers. They deserve it.”

    Next steps

    The deal has to be formally approved by the Committee on Culture and Education (January tbc) and by the Parliament as a whole (March plenary tbc), as well as by the Council.

    Parliament and Council negotiators agreed on Friday on a new bill to protect EU journalists from growing threats to media freedom and the industry’s viability.

    Parliament and Council negotiators agreed on Friday on a new bill to protect EU journalists from growing threats to media freedom and the industry’s viability.

    Parliament and Council negotiators agreed on Friday on a new bill to protect EU journalists from growing threats to media freedom and the industry’s viability.

    Parliament and Council negotiators agreed on Friday on a new bill to protect EU journalists from growing threats to media freedom and the industry’s viability.

    According to the provisional political agreement between the co-legislators, reached on 15 December 2023 on the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), member states will have to ensure that citizens have access to a plurality of editorially independent media content.

    Particularly, EU countries will have to ensure the editorial and functional independence of public media by:

    - appointing heads and board members through transparent and non-discriminatory procedures. Their term of office will have to be long enough to guarantee the media’s independence, and dismissing them before the end of their term will be prohibited, except when they no longer meet their performance criteria (judicial review possible);

    - transparent and objective funding procedures, as well as sustainable and predictable funding to safeguard independence;

    - independent monitoring of media’s political independence, with public reports.

    Protection of journalists’ work

    Member state authorities will be prohibited from interfering with editorial decisions.

    MEPs secured a prohibition on journalists and editors having to disclose their sources, including by detainment, sanctions, office searches or by installing intrusive surveillance software on their devices.

    By way of derogation, such interferences will only be permitted on a case-by-case basis ‘by an overriding reason of public interest’, subject to authorisation by a judicial authority. In order to use intrusive surveillance software against journalists, it will also need to be justified for investigations of serious crimes punishable by a custodial sentence in the respective member state. In this case, surveillance measures will have to be regularly reviewed by the judiciary.

    Even in these cases, the right of subjects to be informed about ongoing surveillance as well as having to have judicial protection will apply.

    Ownership transparency

    To assess media independence, the EMFA will oblige media, including micro-enterprises, to publish information on their direct and indirect owners, including if they are directly or indirectly owned by the state or a public authority, in a national database.

    Media will also have to report on funds received from state advertising and on state financial support. This includes funds from non-EU countries.

    Provisions against big platforms making arbitrary decisions

    MEPs successfully negotiated the creation of a system to ensure that decisions on content moderation by very large online platforms do not negatively affect media freedom.

    Platforms will first have to distinguish independent media from non-independent sources. Media would be notified that the platform intends to delete or restrict their content and have 24 hours to respond (shorter timeframe in case of crisis).

    If after the reply (or in absence of it) the platform still considers the media content does not comply with its conditions, it can proceed with deleting or restricting. However, if the media considers that the decision does not have sufficient grounds and undermines media freedom, they have the right to bring the case to an out-of-court dispute settlement body and request an opinion from the European Board for Media Services (a new EU board of national regulators to be set up by the EMFA).

    Fair allocation of state advertising

    To ensure media outlets do not become dependent on state advertising, public funds to media service providers or online platforms will be allocated via open and non-discriminatory procedures, based on public criteria. Member states will have to distribute state advertising expenditure to a wide plurality of media.

    Public authorities will publish information every year about their state advertising expenditure, the total annual amount spent and the amounts spent per media service provider or online platform.

    Quotes

    “This is a huge win for media freedom,” rapporteur Sabine Verheyen (EPP, DE) said after the deal was agreed. “We have managed to secure all of Parliament's most important demands: editors will be more independent in their decisions, media ownership will be more transparent, and media freedom will not be restricted by big platforms. This is a significant legislative milestone to safeguard the diversity and freedom of our media and protect our democracies”.

    “Today’s deal is nothing less than recognition. Recognition of the huge effort and hard work that all journalists do every day, risking their lives to preserve our democracies,” LIBE rapporteur Ramona Strugariu (Renew, RO) said. “It is a huge step towards protecting media freedom and securing a safe environment for journalists and media workers. They deserve it.”

    Next steps

    The deal has to be formally approved by the Committee on Culture and Education (January tbc) and by the Parliament as a whole (March plenary tbc), as well as by the Council.

    According to the provisional political agreement between the co-legislators, reached on 15 December 2023 on the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), member states will have to ensure that citizens have access to a plurality of editorially independent media content.

    Particularly, EU countries will have to ensure the editorial and functional independence of public media by:

    - appointing heads and board members through transparent and non-discriminatory procedures. Their term of office will have to be long enough to guarantee the media’s independence, and dismissing them before the end of their term will be prohibited, except when they no longer meet their performance criteria (judicial review possible);

    - transparent and objective funding procedures, as well as sustainable and predictable funding to safeguard independence;

    - independent monitoring of media’s political independence, with public reports.

    Protection of journalists’ work

    Member state authorities will be prohibited from interfering with editorial decisions.

    MEPs secured a prohibition on journalists and editors having to disclose their sources, including by detainment, sanctions, office searches or by installing intrusive surveillance software on their devices.

    By way of derogation, such interferences will only be permitted on a case-by-case basis ‘by an overriding reason of public interest’, subject to authorisation by a judicial authority. In order to use intrusive surveillance software against journalists, it will also need to be justified for investigations of serious crimes punishable by a custodial sentence in the respective member state. In this case, surveillance measures will have to be regularly reviewed by the judiciary.

    Even in these cases, the right of subjects to be informed about ongoing surveillance as well as having to have judicial protection will apply.

    Ownership transparency

    To assess media independence, the EMFA will oblige media, including micro-enterprises, to publish information on their direct and indirect owners, including if they are directly or indirectly owned by the state or a public authority, in a national database.

    Media will also have to report on funds received from state advertising and on state financial support. This includes funds from non-EU countries.

    Provisions against big platforms making arbitrary decisions

    MEPs successfully negotiated the creation of a system to ensure that decisions on content moderation by very large online platforms do not negatively affect media freedom.

    Platforms will first have to distinguish independent media from non-independent sources. Media would be notified that the platform intends to delete or restrict their content and have 24 hours to respond (shorter timeframe in case of crisis).

    If after the reply (or in absence of it) the platform still considers the media content does not comply with its conditions, it can proceed with deleting or restricting. However, if the media considers that the decision does not have sufficient grounds and undermines media freedom, they have the right to bring the case to an out-of-court dispute settlement body and request an opinion from the European Board for Media Services (a new EU board of national regulators to be set up by the EMFA).

    Fair allocation of state advertising

    To ensure media outlets do not become dependent on state advertising, public funds to media service providers or online platforms will be allocated via open and non-discriminatory procedures, based on public criteria. Member states will have to distribute state advertising expenditure to a wide plurality of media.

    Public authorities will publish information every year about their state advertising expenditure, the total annual amount spent and the amounts spent per media service provider or online platform.

    Quotes

    “This is a huge win for media freedom,” rapporteur Sabine Verheyen (EPP, DE) said after the deal was agreed. “We have managed to secure all of Parliament's most important demands: editors will be more independent in their decisions, media ownership will be more transparent, and media freedom will not be restricted by big platforms. This is a significant legislative milestone to safeguard the diversity and freedom of our media and protect our democracies”.

    “Today’s deal is nothing less than recognition. Recognition of the huge effort and hard work that all journalists do every day, risking their lives to preserve our democracies,” LIBE rapporteur Ramona Strugariu (Renew, RO) said. “It is a huge step towards protecting media freedom and securing a safe environment for journalists and media workers. They deserve it.”

    Next steps

    The deal has to be formally approved by the Committee on Culture and Education (January tbc) and by the Parliament as a whole (March plenary tbc), as well as by the Council.

    According to the provisional political agreement between the co-legislators, reached on 15 December 2023 on the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), member states will have to ensure that citizens have access to a plurality of editorially independent media content.

    Particularly, EU countries will have to ensure the editorial and functional independence of public media by:

    - appointing heads and board members through transparent and non-discriminatory procedures. Their term of office will have to be long enough to guarantee the media’s independence, and dismissing them before the end of their term will be prohibited, except when they no longer meet their performance criteria (judicial review possible);

    - transparent and objective funding procedures, as well as sustainable and predictable funding to safeguard independence;

    - independent monitoring of media’s political independence, with public reports.

    Protection of journalists’ work

    Member state authorities will be prohibited from interfering with editorial decisions.

    MEPs secured a prohibition on journalists and editors having to disclose their sources, including by detainment, sanctions, office searches or by installing intrusive surveillance software on their devices.

    By way of derogation, such interferences will only be permitted on a case-by-case basis ‘by an overriding reason of public interest’, subject to authorisation by a judicial authority. In order to use intrusive surveillance software against journalists, it will also need to be justified for investigations of serious crimes punishable by a custodial sentence in the respective member state. In this case, surveillance measures will have to be regularly reviewed by the judiciary.

    Even in these cases, the right of subjects to be informed about ongoing surveillance as well as having to have judicial protection will apply.

    Ownership transparency

    To assess media independence, the EMFA will oblige media, including micro-enterprises, to publish information on their direct and indirect owners, including if they are directly or indirectly owned by the state or a public authority, in a national database.

    Media will also have to report on funds received from state advertising and on state financial support. This includes funds from non-EU countries.

    Provisions against big platforms making arbitrary decisions

    MEPs successfully negotiated the creation of a system to ensure that decisions on content moderation by very large online platforms do not negatively affect media freedom.

    Platforms will first have to distinguish independent media from non-independent sources. Media would be notified that the platform intends to delete or restrict their content and have 24 hours to respond (shorter timeframe in case of crisis).

    If after the reply (or in absence of it) the platform still considers the media content does not comply with its conditions, it can proceed with deleting or restricting. However, if the media considers that the decision does not have sufficient grounds and undermines media freedom, they have the right to bring the case to an out-of-court dispute settlement body and request an opinion from the European Board for Media Services (a new EU board of national regulators to be set up by the EMFA).

    Fair allocation of state advertising

    To ensure media outlets do not become dependent on state advertising, public funds to media service providers or online platforms will be allocated via open and non-discriminatory procedures, based on public criteria. Member states will have to distribute state advertising expenditure to a wide plurality of media.

    Public authorities will publish information every year about their state advertising expenditure, the total annual amount spent and the amounts spent per media service provider or online platform.

    Quotes

    “This is a huge win for media freedom,” rapporteur Sabine Verheyen (EPP, DE) said after the deal was agreed. “We have managed to secure all of Parliament's most important demands: editors will be more independent in their decisions, media ownership will be more transparent, and media freedom will not be restricted by big platforms. This is a significant legislative milestone to safeguard the diversity and freedom of our media and protect our democracies”.

    “Today’s deal is nothing less than recognition. Recognition of the huge effort and hard work that all journalists do every day, risking their lives to preserve our democracies,” LIBE rapporteur Ramona Strugariu (Renew, RO) said. “It is a huge step towards protecting media freedom and securing a safe environment for journalists and media workers. They deserve it.”

    Next steps

    The deal has to be formally approved by the Committee on Culture and Education (January tbc) and by the Parliament as a whole (March plenary tbc), as well as by the Council.

    According to the provisional political agreement between the co-legislators, reached on 15 December 2023 on the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), member states will have to ensure that citizens have access to a plurality of editorially independent media content.

    European Media Freedom Act

    Particularly, EU countries will have to ensure the editorial and functional independence of public media by:

    - appointing heads and board members through transparent and non-discriminatory procedures. Their term of office will have to be long enough to guarantee the media’s independence, and dismissing them before the end of their term will be prohibited, except when they no longer meet their performance criteria (judicial review possible);

    - transparent and objective funding procedures, as well as sustainable and predictable funding to safeguard independence;

    - independent monitoring of media’s political independence, with public reports.

    Protection of journalists’ work

    Protection of journalists’ work

    Member state authorities will be prohibited from interfering with editorial decisions.

    MEPs secured a prohibition on journalists and editors having to disclose their sources, including by detainment, sanctions, office searches or by installing intrusive surveillance software on their devices.

    By way of derogation, such interferences will only be permitted on a case-by-case basis ‘by an overriding reason of public interest’, subject to authorisation by a judicial authority. In order to use intrusive surveillance software against journalists, it will also need to be justified for investigations of serious crimes punishable by a custodial sentence in the respective member state. In this case, surveillance measures will have to be regularly reviewed by the judiciary.

    Even in these cases, the right of subjects to be informed about ongoing surveillance as well as having to have judicial protection will apply.

    Ownership transparency

    Ownership transparency

    To assess media independence, the EMFA will oblige media, including micro-enterprises, to publish information on their direct and indirect owners, including if they are directly or indirectly owned by the state or a public authority, in a national database.

    Media will also have to report on funds received from state advertising and on state financial support. This includes funds from non-EU countries.

    Provisions against big platforms making arbitrary decisions

    Provisions against big platforms making arbitrary decisions

    MEPs successfully negotiated the creation of a system to ensure that decisions on content moderation by very large online platforms do not negatively affect media freedom.

    very large online platforms

    Platforms will first have to distinguish independent media from non-independent sources. Media would be notified that the platform intends to delete or restrict their content and have 24 hours to respond (shorter timeframe in case of crisis).

    If after the reply (or in absence of it) the platform still considers the media content does not comply with its conditions, it can proceed with deleting or restricting. However, if the media considers that the decision does not have sufficient grounds and undermines media freedom, they have the right to bring the case to an out-of-court dispute settlement body and request an opinion from the European Board for Media Services (a new EU board of national regulators to be set up by the EMFA).

    Fair allocation of state advertising

    Fair allocation of state advertising

    To ensure media outlets do not become dependent on state advertising, public funds to media service providers or online platforms will be allocated via open and non-discriminatory procedures, based on public criteria. Member states will have to distribute state advertising expenditure to a wide plurality of media.

    Public authorities will publish information every year about their state advertising expenditure, the total annual amount spent and the amounts spent per media service provider or online platform.

    Quotes

    Quotes

    “This is a huge win for media freedom,” rapporteur Sabine Verheyen (EPP, DE) said after the deal was agreed. “We have managed to secure all of Parliament's most important demands: editors will be more independent in their decisions, media ownership will be more transparent, and media freedom will not be restricted by big platforms. This is a significant legislative milestone to safeguard the diversity and freedom of our media and protect our democracies”.

    Sabine Verheyen (EPP, DE)

    “Today’s deal is nothing less than recognition. Recognition of the huge effort and hard work that all journalists do every day, risking their lives to preserve our democracies,” LIBE rapporteur Ramona Strugariu (Renew, RO) said. “It is a huge step towards protecting media freedom and securing a safe environment for journalists and media workers. They deserve it.”

    Ramona Strugariu (Renew, RO)

    Next steps

    Next steps

    The deal has to be formally approved by the Committee on Culture and Education (January tbc) and by the Parliament as a whole (March plenary tbc), as well as by the Council.

    Contact: 

    Contact: 
    Contact: 
  • Agnese KRIVADE 

    Agnese KRIVADE Agnese KRIVADE 
    Press Officer 
    Press Officer Press Officer 
    Contactgegevens: 
    Contactgegevens: 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+32) 228 46 718 (BXL) 
  • Telefoonnummer: (+32) 228 46 718 (BXL) Telefoonnummer: (+32) 228 46 718 (BXL)Telefoonnummer: (BXL) 
  • Mobiel telefoonnummer: (+32) 470 89 01 46 
  • Mobiel telefoonnummer: (+32) 470 89 01 46 Mobiel telefoonnummer: (+32) 470 89 01 46Mobiel telefoonnummer:  
  • E-mail: agnese.krivade@europarl.europa.eu 
  • E-mail: agnese.krivade@europarl.europa.eu E-mail: agnese.krivade@europarl.europa.euE-mail:  
  • Twitteraccount: @EPCulture 
  • Twitteraccount: @EPCulture Twitteraccount: @EPCultureTwitteraccount:  
     
     

    Further information 

    Further information 
    Further information 
  • Recording of press conference following the deal with EP lead negotiators Sabine Verheyen (EPP,DE) and Ramona Strugariu (Renew, RO) with Council and Commission representatives  Recording of press conference following the deal with EP lead negotiators Sabine Verheyen (EPP,DE) and Ramona Strugariu (Renew, RO) with Council and Commission representatives 
     
     
     
     
     

    Productinformatie 

    REF.:  20231207IPR15742 

    Productinformatie 

    Productinformatie 
    Productinformatie 
    Productinformatie 
    REF.:  20231207IPR15742 
    REF.:  20231207IPR15742 
    REF.: REF.:REF.: 20231207IPR15742 20231207IPR15742 

    Deel deze pagina: 

    Deel deze pagina: 
    Deel deze pagina: 
  • Facebook Facebook 
  • Twitter Twitter 
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn 
  • WhatsApp WhatsApp Aanmelden voor e-mailupdatesAanmelden voor e-mailupdatesPdf-versie Pdf-versie Nieuws  Bekijk het menu: nieuws  Bekijk het menu: nieuws Het Parlement in uw land 
  • Open als nieuwe pagina Brussels
  • Open als nieuwe pagina Brussels Open als nieuwe paginaBrussels
  • Open als nieuwe pagina Den Haag
  • Open als nieuwe pagina Den Haag Open als nieuwe paginaDen HaagTools 
  • Open als nieuwe pagina Wetgevingsobservatorium
  • Open als nieuwe pagina Wetgevingsobservatorium Open als nieuwe paginaWetgevingsobservatorium
  • Naar pagina gaan Multimedia Centre
  • Naar pagina gaan Multimedia Centre Naar pagina gaanMultimedia Centre
  • Open als nieuwe pagina EbS
  • Open als nieuwe pagina EbS Open als nieuwe paginaEbSDe Voorzitter van het Europees Parlement 
  • Open als nieuwe pagina Webpagina van de Voorzitter van het Parlement
  • Open als nieuwe pagina Webpagina van de Voorzitter van het Parlement Open als nieuwe paginaWebpagina van de Voorzitter van het Parlement Menu verbergen: Nieuws   Menu verbergen: Nieuws Europees Parlement  Menu bekijken: Europees Parlement   Menu bekijken: Europees Parlement 
  • Naar pagina gaan Nieuws 
  • Naar pagina gaan Nieuws  Naar pagina gaanNieuws 
  • Naar pagina gaan Leden 
  • Naar pagina gaan Leden  Naar pagina gaanLeden 
  • Naar pagina gaan Over het Parlement 
  • Naar pagina gaan Over het Parlement  Naar pagina gaanOver het Parlement 
  • Naar pagina gaan Plenaire vergadering 
  • Naar pagina gaan Plenaire vergadering  Naar pagina gaanPlenaire vergadering 
  • Naar pagina gaan Commissies 
  • Naar pagina gaan Commissies  Naar pagina gaanCommissies 
  • Naar pagina gaan Delegaties 
  • Naar pagina gaan Delegaties  Naar pagina gaanDelegaties Menu verbergen: Europees Parlement Menu verbergen: Europees Parlement  

    Het Parlement in de sociale media  

    Het Parlement in de sociale media 
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Facebook  
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Facebook   Bekijk het Parlement op Facebook 
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Twitter  
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Twitter   Bekijk het Parlement op Twitter 
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Flickr  
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Flickr   Bekijk het Parlement op Flickr 
  • Bekijk het Parlement op LinkedIn  
  • Bekijk het Parlement op LinkedIn   Bekijk het Parlement op LinkedIn 
  • Bekijk het Parlement op YouTube  
  • Bekijk het Parlement op YouTube   Bekijk het Parlement op YouTube 
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Instagram  
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Instagram   Bekijk het Parlement op Instagram 
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Pinterest  
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Pinterest   Bekijk het Parlement op Pinterest 
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Snapchat  
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Snapchat   Bekijk het Parlement op Snapchat 
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Reddit  
  • Bekijk het Parlement op Reddit   Bekijk het Parlement op Reddit Informatieve links 
  • Naar pagina gaanContact 
  • Naar pagina gaanContact Naar pagina gaanContact 
  • Naar pagina gaanRSS 
  • Naar pagina gaanRSS Naar pagina gaanRSS 
  • Naar pagina gaanSitemap 
  • Naar pagina gaanSitemap Naar pagina gaanSitemap 
  • Naar pagina gaanJuridische mededeling 
  • Naar pagina gaanJuridische mededeling Naar pagina gaanJuridische mededeling 
  • Naar pagina gaanPrivacybeleid 
  • Naar pagina gaanPrivacybeleid Naar pagina gaanPrivacybeleid 
  • Naar pagina gaanToegankelijkheid 
  • Naar pagina gaanToegankelijkheid Naar pagina gaanToegankelijkheid